Hi folks.
I've done "some" research, but now I'm just going in circles.
I don't mind the cost of the printer/bits, so long as the cost per page returns the best saving. I would be printing text documents with some colour wherever there are pictures, but I am not after top quality photos. I would be printing 4500-10000 per year, but if the choice of printer needs that range cut it would be either 4500-7000 or 7500-10,000, with ~80-85% in the lower range.
I have thought from looking around a little, that laser is better, but laser/inkjet comparison charts have overlapping numbers for black and colour cost per page. These numbers are just what I've seen so far so feel free to correct them.
Lasers from 1p-3p+ black and 2.6p-8p+ colour
vs Inkjets 0.5p-3p+ black and 3-5p+ colour.
If it's correct the cost per page overlaps for mono/colour laser vs mono/colour inkjet, I'm thinking these numbers only apply to me if the toner/ink doesn't "go off". Possibly inkjets only have better prices per print when the ink cartridges are huge, so I'm wondering if ink cartridges will go off in the printer if my usage is mostly 4500-7000 a year. There might be issues with toner sitting in laser printers for a few years but it doesn't look like it.
If there are best options from laser and inkjets based on my needs and usage, that's fine, I am first trying to pin down laser or inkjet, but it doesn't have to be one or the other that's just to try to narrow the choices.One running cost I found out about was changing a part on laser printers every ~50,000 prints, the example was £230 so this adds 0.45p to each print.
I'm also wondering how I should combine cost per page numbers for black and colour into one overall figure per print? 75% black plus 25% colour? 90% black plus 10% colour? It might not be that straightforward because they talk about "coverage" and I'm not sure if that means only a proportion of the colour print is actually colour.
Many thanks for any help.