Originally Posted by Agent
ummm whiskey tango foxtrot ?
Originally Posted by Agent
ummm whiskey tango foxtrot ?
AMD Athlon 4400X2 @ 2.565PenisextentionMhzOriginally Posted by Knoxville
Dual Layer, Gold Plated, LED Power,Dual Golden OMG IT MAKES MY CodPiece BIGGER 1-1-1-1 DDR62.3 @ 1222.3433Mhz
5 X 400GB Porn Array
X1800XT Dildo enchanged 3D Version, 512MegaLongJohn
Oh, did I mention.....I like sheep.....
WWW.MrsBurley.CO.UK now updated
I would go out and buy the first sound card with 3 ports:
Mic in
Optical IN
Co-ax/optical out DD/DTS encoded
Or A64 nForceX with soundstorm
I love the fact that its 1 cable to connect up and the DAC is in my amp and away from all that EMF noise.
GAteKeeper
Saw this on a japanise site (very badly babelfished) a few months back, it doesn't look like any real improvment on the Audig2.
What did happen to the Audigy 3?
Same as GateKeeper, I use one coax cable to my decoder and the DD encoding really seems to help (try switching it on and off while listening to something - just increases the depth and hiss reduction). Untill other companies cotton onto the DD/DTS encoding idea like Nvidia I'm sticking with my SoundStorm board.
G4 PowerMac - Tiger 10.4 - 512MB RAM
MacBook - 2Ghz - 1GB RAM - 120GB HDD
Rotel RC970BX | DBX DriveRack |2x Rotel RB850
B&W DM640i | Velodyne 1512
Creative products, all of them (that I know of) only sell becuase they mislead the consumer in several ways, and are also generally crap with lots of advertising.Its the sort of stuff that sellsVERY well in pcworld... (I assume, never worked there..).
The one example I can be bothered to note is that the DACs on the audigiy2 are as good as the box says, BUT the other chips on there down sample the signal anyway. I myself would call that misleading... and no I cba to find the link to back it up, I read it several months ago but iirc, its widly known (andI probably got someof the details wrong anyway).
Soundstorm is good, but I read it's not going to be put on any more mobos, as not enough people thought the xtra cost was worth it. The Realtek chips eat a fair amount of CPU cycles. Other soundcards are nice, but don't have creative's game support. So despite all the probs, there are benefits to buying an Audigy. But this new card sounds like a waste of money. As for that mythical improvement in STN - I read an article which explained how the last claimed improvement was more hype than substance.
And 5.1 is plenty enough speakers in my study. Speakers are breeding like bloody rabbits - where will it stop? 20.1 anyone?
Your correct that it wont be on any of the nforce 4 range, but the reason certainly isnt nothing to do with people not wanting to pay the extra. (see here 2 3 4).Originally Posted by Thorsson
People would much rather pay the extra and not having to fork out for a seperate soundcard : which would cost them more in the long run.
And im afraid i dont know the real reason either. Many people put it down to the finite amount of space the nforce 4 silicon has, other put it down to licencing issues (creative....again...), maybe both, or maybe somthing we havnt even thought of, but the fact still remains that it wont be in, which sucks
Well, technically, a separate sound card can save cost.. Everytime you buy a mobo, you need to pay a premium to get the sound feature you want.. Whereas with a sound card, you could just pick whatever is good without the whistles, knowing that what you really want can simply be added on with your exisiting card. I don't know whats the typical cycle of sound card (esp. with the announcement of this Audigy 4), but it used to take a while before Creative release a new card..
But what are the alternatives to Creative for a high end sound card?
Looking through a few retailers i found Terratec and M-Audio, and i have barely heard of either of them.
I don't mean to sound cold, or cruel, or vicious, but I am so that's the way it comes out.
Thats cos they are high end cards and they where not aimed at the normal users.
They have now started to aim there cards at the end user and so we see more of there cards around.
Thorsson
"Creative's Game support"
What support ? EAX you mean ?
It is vastle lacking in compared to A3D (RIP) which sadly was baught by creative and killed off cos they knew eax sucked.
A3D Used less system resources. Gave a much clear definition to the sound. Depth percetion is better with A3D.
Threw out the history of creative labs with there live range of cards, they have missled us all.
To start with the first creative cards where what they said they where but then the monkey boys got in on the act and they started to cut corners and now look at us.
PC sound systems are way behind the rest of the system. Every thing else has moved fwd yet sound seems to be taking a back seat.
When sound storm came out it kicked creative where it hurt and still can.
I was looking fwd to NF4 based shuttle but now that SS is not going to be on it i doubt i will upgrade till at least a SS level card comes out. This SN45G v2 will serve me for some time only the gfx needs updating.
So for me creative can go to hell for all i care.
8.1??? Hardly anything, if anything, supports 7.1, so what the hell is the point of 8.1? Blimey...
Home cinema: Toshiba 42XV555DB Full HD LCD | Onkyo TX-SR705 | NAD C352 | Monitor Audio Bronze B2 | Monitor Audio Bronze C | Monitor Audio Bronze BFX | Yamaha NSC120 | BK Monolith sub | Toshiba HD-EP35 HD-DVD | Samsung BD-P1400 BluRay Player | Pioneer DV-575 | Squeezebox3 | Virgin Media V+ Box
PC: Asus P5B | Core2duo 2.13GHz | 2GB DDR2 PC6400 | Inno3d iChill 7900GS | Auzentech X-Plosion 7.1 | 250GB | 500GB | NEC DVDRW | Dual AG Neovo 19"
HTPC: | Core2Duo E6420 2.13GHz | 2GB DDR2 | 250GBx2 | Radeon X1300 | Terratec Aureon 7.1 | Windows MCE 2005
Laptop: 1.5GHz Centrino | 512MB | 60GB | 15" Wide TFT | Wifi | DVDRW
Interesting. A3D is still mentioned. Were they so ahead of their time?
(I was going to get one but by the time I was going to buy it, it was killed and I thought support would be too scarce)
Surely EAX2 HD (Never tried/heard) can compare to it.. or not?
Yup, but do you know why ?Originally Posted by Apex
A3D was a "true" form of sound. It calculated where the sound was coming from, and adjusted accordingly.
EAX ?, EAX doesnt have anything to do with positional infomation !
2.1...5.1...7.1 ?, nope, thats not EAX, thats D3D doing all the hard work. EAX add's "enviromental" effects on after the sound has been produced by another source (either via D3D, or dolby digital if you have soundstorm and UT2004).
EAX is a usfull thing to have, but it really isnt that good. Its just marketed well.
edit - btw apex, this really had nothing to do with your post bud, i was just agreeing and extending on it a bit
Originally Posted by TooNice
Ahead...they where miles in front with it.
EAX has it's place and imho at the mo it's in the wrong place.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)