Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: EKWB MX vs EVO - Supremacy CPU blocks?

  1. #1
    RGB Champion Ttaskmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    5,702
    Thanks
    265
    Thanked
    609 times in 511 posts
    • Ttaskmaster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X99-PRO
      • CPU:
      • i7 5960X o/c to 4.summat
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair DDR4 somethingorother
      • Storage:
      • Samsung Evo 120GB and Seagate Baracuda 2TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte G1 GTX980Ti
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova G2 1000W
      • Case:
      • Phankecks Enthoo Luxe perspex window
      • Operating System:
      • Win10 64 Home
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator XB270HU 1440 IPS GSync
      • Internet:
      • BT 0.7Mbps 'In The Sticks' version

    EKWB MX vs EVO - Supremacy CPU blocks?

    Heya,

    I was all set to get a Supremacy EVO CSQ (either standard or Nickel), but then discovered the Supremacy MX...

    Reviews would have me believe the MX is exactly the same as the EVO in terms of performance, just cheaper because it doesn't include loads of different mounts. I just have to make sure I get the 1155 compatible one...

    Do the Hexites concur?
    Would I be better off getting the Nickel CSQ EVO over either the normal EVO or this MX one?


    Cheers,
    Tasky.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Cork, Ireland
    Posts
    45
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    • robbiec's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Crosshair VII Hero WiFi
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen R9 3900X
      • Memory:
      • TridentZ 16GB DDR4 @ 3533C14
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 500GB Samsung 970 EVO PLUS | 2 x Toshiba X300 4TB |
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD RX Vega 64 - EK FC Block
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Prime Gold 1000W
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC0-10 Dynamic
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro (64-Bit), Kali Linux, Ecomstation 2.1
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2518D

    Re: EKWB MX vs EVO - Supremacy CPU blocks?

    If you're not chasing after the last 2 degrees C then go for the MX with the right mount but if you think you might be upgrading in the next 12 months to 2011 V3 then get the Evo.

  3. #3
    RGB Champion Ttaskmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    5,702
    Thanks
    265
    Thanked
    609 times in 511 posts
    • Ttaskmaster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X99-PRO
      • CPU:
      • i7 5960X o/c to 4.summat
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair DDR4 somethingorother
      • Storage:
      • Samsung Evo 120GB and Seagate Baracuda 2TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte G1 GTX980Ti
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova G2 1000W
      • Case:
      • Phankecks Enthoo Luxe perspex window
      • Operating System:
      • Win10 64 Home
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator XB270HU 1440 IPS GSync
      • Internet:
      • BT 0.7Mbps 'In The Sticks' version

    Re: EKWB MX vs EVO - Supremacy CPU blocks?

    Quote Originally Posted by robbiec View Post
    If you're not chasing after the last 2 degrees C then go for the MX with the right mount but if you think you might be upgrading in the next 12 months to 2011 V3 then get the Evo.
    Cheers, but already went with the MX long ago.
    Only seemed to come with the 115X mount anyway, but certainly it does the job.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •