Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 20 of 20

Thread: GPU / CPU suitability

  1. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    305
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    you have to drop to 2T command rate which will make it a teensy bit slower

  2. #18
    Senior Member ajones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    1,143
    Thanks
    64
    Thanked
    70 times in 53 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SSA
    Interesting, is this because it leaves room for further upgrades or is there a technical reason why
    2 x 1GB is better than 4 x 512Mb?
    1T/2T Command rate and on some of the older CPUs, i think you have to drop the clock to 333 with 4 sticks.

    I doubt that it would be a tremendous issue in the long run, as the performance increase with memory hungry products with 2Gb often makes slower timings a moot point! So, if a 2GB memory sub is going to be detrimental somewhere else, I'd not worry about it and upgrade later.

    Corsair Air 540, Asus Prime X570-Pro, Win 10 Pro, AMD R9 3900X, Corsair HX 750, EVGA 1080 Ti, 2x Corsair 2TB MP600, 2x 2TB WD20EZRX, 4x8GB Corsair Dominator, custom watercooled (single loop, 2 rads)
    Corsair 550D, Asus X470-Prime Pro, Win 10 Pro, AMD R7 2700, Corsair RM750i, Asus GTX780 Poseidon, 2x Sammy 500GB 970 EVO, 2x 2TB Seagate Barracuda, 2x8GB Corsair Vengeance, custom watercooled (single loop, 2 rads)
    Synology DS918+ w/ 2xWDC Green 3TB + 2x Seagate Barracuda 6TB, N2200 w/ 2xSammy 1.5TB
    backup:
    Corsair 500R, Gigabyte GA-Z97MX Gaming 5, Win 10 Pro, i5 4690, Corsair HX750i, Sapphire Fury X, 256GB Sammy SM951 M.2 (System), WD SE16 640GB, 2x8GB Corsair Vengeance, Corsair H100i

  3. #19
    Getting older teachmech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Beacons National Park
    Posts
    677
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • teachmech's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Foxconn P45A
      • CPU:
      • Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.2 Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 4 GB Corsair PC6400
      • Storage:
      • Samsung F1 500 Gb + 500 Gb Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI 4870
      • PSU:
      • 630 Watt Hiper
      • Case:
      • 36cm Side fan xcilo
      • Operating System:
      • Vista Home Permium
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 19 inch Widscreen
      • Internet:
      • Tiscali ADSL Max
    2x1GB is better than 4x512 due timmings and command access.

    2X1GB allows 1T command

    4x512 forces 2T command

    So performance is slightly better at 2X1Gb

  4. #20
    SSA
    SSA is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Devon, England
    Posts
    71
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Food for thought certainly. Is the performance difference noticeable or can it only be measured through benchmarks?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. What's the difference between a CPU & GPU?
    By latrosicarius in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 14-02-2013, 01:29 PM
  2. What's the best thermal paste to use for CPU and GPU?
    By 8bit in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 23-01-2006, 11:45 PM
  3. Overclocking Question
    By planetgong in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-12-2005, 09:29 AM
  4. Xbox 2 Initial Specs
    By PanzerKnight in forum Gaming
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 19-07-2004, 03:09 AM
  5. CPU TIM Guide
    By Steve in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30-05-2004, 02:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •