you have to drop to 2T command rate which will make it a teensy bit slower
you have to drop to 2T command rate which will make it a teensy bit slower
1T/2T Command rate and on some of the older CPUs, i think you have to drop the clock to 333 with 4 sticks.Originally Posted by SSA
I doubt that it would be a tremendous issue in the long run, as the performance increase with memory hungry products with 2Gb often makes slower timings a moot point! So, if a 2GB memory sub is going to be detrimental somewhere else, I'd not worry about it and upgrade later.
Corsair Air 540, Asus Prime X570-Pro, Win 10 Pro, AMD R9 3900X, Corsair HX 750, EVGA 1080 Ti, 2x Corsair 2TB MP600, 2x 2TB WD20EZRX, 4x8GB Corsair Dominator, custom watercooled (single loop, 2 rads)
Corsair 550D, Asus X470-Prime Pro, Win 10 Pro, AMD R7 2700, Corsair RM750i, Asus GTX780 Poseidon, 2x Sammy 500GB 970 EVO, 2x 2TB Seagate Barracuda, 2x8GB Corsair Vengeance, custom watercooled (single loop, 2 rads)
Synology DS918+ w/ 2xWDC Green 3TB + 2x Seagate Barracuda 6TB, N2200 w/ 2xSammy 1.5TB
backup:
Corsair 500R, Gigabyte GA-Z97MX Gaming 5, Win 10 Pro, i5 4690, Corsair HX750i, Sapphire Fury X, 256GB Sammy SM951 M.2 (System), WD SE16 640GB, 2x8GB Corsair Vengeance, Corsair H100i
2x1GB is better than 4x512 due timmings and command access.
2X1GB allows 1T command
4x512 forces 2T command
So performance is slightly better at 2X1Gb
Food for thought certainly. Is the performance difference noticeable or can it only be measured through benchmarks?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)