Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Non Maching Results With PSU Calculator

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Enfield, London
    Posts
    277
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked
    17 times in 15 posts
    • TheDutyPaid's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Gryphon Z87
      • CPU:
      • i7 4770K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB
      • Storage:
      • 2TB and 500GB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus 560ti
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 750W
      • Case:
      • 1953 Bush AC-34 Radio now case
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 20" Samsung & 27" ASUS
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity, Fast :-)

    Non Maching Results With PSU Calculator

    So far I have used to online PSU calculators. The one on the ASUS site said minimum of 650W then a different site said 403W quite a difference in power levels.

    I was careful to do all the same on both sites.

    I there a true trusted PSU calculator site?

  2. #2
    Supermarket Generic Brand AETAaAS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Merseyside
    Posts
    654
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked
    147 times in 129 posts
    • AETAaAS's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Gaming Plus
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 2600
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Vengeance 3000
      • Storage:
      • Intel 660p 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 1080TI SC2
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Focus 850W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Focus G
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • HP Envy 32
      • Internet:
      • 17mbps

    Re: Non Maching Results With PSU Calculator

    I tend to calculate based on known TDPs of the CPU and GPU (by far the most power hungry individual components) then throwing 150W for mobo, drives, etc (in my typical build of 2 RAM sticks, 1 SSD, 2 drives and 2 opticals) then add another 150W for headroom.

    I think its a safe calculation, but even with a 1090T and 7870, it comes out to 600W. Nowadays considered the minimum for gaming builds. I think most experienced builders go with what feels right and don't calculate, and then overcompensate since there is little lost by going 10-20% over your calculations.

    This calculator has been around for donkey's years and I think it has a good reputation.

    Alternatively you could post your build. I'm sure the community would be happy to help.

  3. #3
    HEXUS.social member Agent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Internet
    Posts
    19,185
    Thanks
    739
    Thanked
    1,614 times in 1,050 posts

    Re: Non Maching Results With PSU Calculator

    Quote Originally Posted by AETAaAS View Post
    This calculator has been around for donkey's years and I think it has a good reputation.
    No, that has a terrible reputation. Search on here for "PSU Calculator" - the results it gives are not even close to being accurate in most cases.

    It doesn't even give you the amps (important) and it calculates capacitor ageing totally wrong. The reasons have been covered many times on here.
    Quote Originally Posted by Saracen View Post
    And by trying to force me to like small pants, they've alienated me.

  4. #4
    Supermarket Generic Brand AETAaAS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Merseyside
    Posts
    654
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked
    147 times in 129 posts
    • AETAaAS's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Gaming Plus
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 2600
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Vengeance 3000
      • Storage:
      • Intel 660p 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 1080TI SC2
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Focus 850W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Focus G
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • HP Envy 32
      • Internet:
      • 17mbps

    Re: Non Maching Results With PSU Calculator

    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    No, that has a terrible reputation. Search on here for "PSU Calculator" - the results it gives are not even close to being accurate in most cases.

    It doesn't even give you the amps (important) and it calculates capacitor ageing totally wrong. The reasons have been covered many times on here.
    Sorry, like I said I almost never use a calculator but I see it linked and referenced on other sites.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Aberlour, NE Scotland
    Posts
    609
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked
    27 times in 26 posts
    • pastymuncher's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Pro
      • CPU:
      • i5 9600K @ 5Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 16Gb Gskill Trident 3866mhz
      • Storage:
      • 250Gb Samsung 970 Evo Polaris+960GB Corsair MP510
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Inno3D GTX1070 iChill Air Boss X3
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet Straight Power 11 550w
      • Case:
      • Self built desk mod
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG Rev A04
      • Internet:
      • BT Fibre

    Re: Non Maching Results With PSU Calculator

    A quality 400w psu will be more than enough for your rig if it's the one listed in your profile. I doubt if it would pull 300w on full load.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    124
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked
    17 times in 16 posts
    • D1DM's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-V PRO
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5-3570K
      • Memory:
      • Crucial 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Intel HD 4000
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX650
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-A10
      • Operating System:
      • Window 7 Home Premium 64bit

    Re: Non Maching Results With PSU Calculator

    You've got to question what methods they use to calculate the power consumption of the system entered. As well as the motivation of the person(s)/organisation(s) providing the calculator. They are very likely to be at least slightly different in each case.

    Apart from the fact that multiple power supply manufacturer's often use the eXtreme Outer Vision one, just with different branding, and apparently different implimentations, as someone on another forum once commented to me that if you put the same system config into Thermaltake's calculator you will get a different result compared to the Enermax one, for instance/example.

  7. Received thanks from:

    TheDutyPaid (09-09-2013)

  8. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Enfield, London
    Posts
    277
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked
    17 times in 15 posts
    • TheDutyPaid's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Gryphon Z87
      • CPU:
      • i7 4770K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB
      • Storage:
      • 2TB and 500GB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus 560ti
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 750W
      • Case:
      • 1953 Bush AC-34 Radio now case
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 20" Samsung & 27" ASUS
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity, Fast :-)

    Re: Non Maching Results With PSU Calculator

    This will be a new build, will be running 17 4770k, 3 HDD, 1 DVD, 5 fans, 1 GTX 560 Ti and 1 cold cathode, so be going with a 750W.

    Which is more then I may need but for price there is not much in stepping up to a higher output PSU.

  9. #8
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: Non Maching Results With PSU Calculator

    A ~500W unit would be more than enough for that build, provided you get a decent brand of course. IMO just save your money unless you're seriously considering a heavy overclock and/or multiple GPUs.

    For comparison, my 1055t + 5870 system under unrealistic OCCT PSU stress load, draws just under 400W AC, so even less than that on the DC side. That system should draw less, and less again under realistic loads.

  10. Received thanks from:

    TheDutyPaid (09-09-2013)

  11. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Enfield, London
    Posts
    277
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked
    17 times in 15 posts
    • TheDutyPaid's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Gryphon Z87
      • CPU:
      • i7 4770K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB
      • Storage:
      • 2TB and 500GB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus 560ti
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 750W
      • Case:
      • 1953 Bush AC-34 Radio now case
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 20" Samsung & 27" ASUS
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity, Fast :-)

    Re: Non Maching Results With PSU Calculator

    Thank you all for your help, this has been very helpful, interesting if somewhat still confusing. I took a look at a web site who sell PC's made to your order, chose all the same parts and their PSU started at 500W (of course higher could be added)

    I have done 3 more PSU calculators, with results being 403, 600 and 650W

    Do they list the power consumption for each part? So I could look up a Motherboard and see it uses X number of watts and add it all together and do the same for the other components.

  12. #10
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: Non Maching Results With PSU Calculator

    PSU calculators tend to over-estimate for a few reasons, one being to compensate for cheaper PSUs which may not meet spec, and for the ones run by the MFRs themselves, because they want to sell you a more expensive one.

    Under-estimates may be based on more realistic loads like gaming *or* video encoding for example, not with everything maxed and/or estimate max power draw vs recommended PSU.

    You can get an idea how much power your system will used based on specs of individual parts, but use some caution; for example, some parts may draw over their TDP depending on load (and conversely, some may draw less, of course). Even comparing measured power consumption, bear in mind some motherboards may have more/less efficient CPU VRM circuitry than others, and so on.

  13. Received thanks from:

    TheDutyPaid (10-09-2013)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •