Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Is a Radeon HD 4870 with a 2GB frame-buffer good? We find out.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    29
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • Lyall3s1's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5Q PRO
      • CPU:
      • Q9550 @ 3.93Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB G-Skill PC2-8500 @ 1111mhz
      • Storage:
      • 2 x Spinpoint F1 1TB Raid 0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Powercolor HD4870X2 @ 790/915
      • PSU:
      • Hi-Power 1300W Modular
      • Case:
      • NZXT Tempest
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 19" TFT

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Another card with a ridiculous ammount of memory?! Surely 1GB is more than enough.

  3. #3
    jim
    jim is offline
    HEXUS.clueless jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    11,466
    Thanks
    614
    Thanked
    1,649 times in 1,310 posts
    • jim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Sandisk SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX650
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG
      • Internet:
      • 10 Mbps ADSL

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    I'm actually surprised that you were so complimentary about the card. 2GB is just needless overkill - the only place where the memory is beneficial is when you go so over the top with the settings that the graphics processing can't cope anyway.

    Coincidentally as well, graphics processing that can cope really isn't far away in terms of the extra cash required for dual-GPU solutions.

  4. #4
    Senior Member this_is_gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,854
    Thanks
    175
    Thanked
    254 times in 216 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Aww, it wasn't tested on a 32-bit OS.

  5. #5
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    23
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    I find that 512 is more than enough for me at the moment

  6. #6
    Senior Member Brewster0101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,614
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked
    54 times in 44 posts
    • Brewster0101's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus m5a99x evo
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX 8350
      • Memory:
      • 8GB (2x4) Corsair Vengence DDR3 1600mghz
      • Storage:
      • Western Green 3TB + Samsung 850Evo 512MB SSD, + 2TB NAS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI 280X
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AXi760
      • Case:
      • Corsair 650D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 27" 27EA63 IPS LED
      • Internet:
      • 120Mb Bt

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Quote Originally Posted by humax View Post
    I find that 512 is more than enough for me at the moment
    I have 512 too but my next card (likely 4870) will have 1gb, seems to be foolish not too.

  7. #7
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    23
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Quote Originally Posted by Brewster0101 View Post
    I have 512 too but my next card (likely 4870) will have 1gb, seems to be foolish not too.
    If i had the money i think thats what i would get to be honest

  8. #8
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    55
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • Lozza81's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte EX58-UD5
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 820 2.66ghz will over clock later as this is sitting under a Thermalright Ultra 120
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 1TB 32mb 7200rpm SATA2 & Maxtor 1TB external
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte ATI HD4870X2 2GB
      • PSU:
      • Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050W
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Spedo Advanced Package with 2 extra 120mm red LED fans
      • Operating System:
      • Vista 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samusng 22inch 226BW
      • Internet:
      • ADSL2 7mb downstream 1.3mb upstream

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Nice review hexus as always, but something which cried out at me was I think you should demonstrate how much more overclocking potential is in Sapphire's Vapor-X cooled HD4870 1GB or 2GB compared to reference cooling ones and also the Nvidia cards.

    If they overclock considerably more, does that not have a huge impact on their value and why perhaps some people might wish to buy one? i.e. it could be the most important thing to test for in the review and I didnt see a page on overclocking this particular card....did I miss something? Did you already overclock one earlier in the 512mb review?

    Like a lot of people here I frankly see no point in producing a 2GB 1 x GPU 4870 as they've done here. It appears Sapphire were looking for something to help differenate their ATI range and didn't fully do their homework. This is surprising when they are the same company who only a few months prior gave us the HD4850x2

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    493
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    34 times in 31 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Im sure with Stream and OpenCL this card can do wonders. Games are just not made to utilize 2GB of Vram *cough* consoles *cough*...well apart from GTA4.
    For gamer 1GB version is more than enough.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    England
    Posts
    161
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    I like the design of the Vapor-X cards but 2GB isn't needed for a 4870 and the price will place it too close to the upcoming Radeon HD 4890.

  11. #11
    Shisha King
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    500
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked
    11 times in 7 posts
    • shaffaaf27's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI P45-T2RS
      • CPU:
      • Intel Q6600 Oced to 3.4GHz
      • Memory:
      • 2x2GB Geil Black Dragon 1066MHz 2.1V C5 @ 1200MHz C5 2.2Vs
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 1TB F3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Crossfire Sapphire 4870 512MB x2
      • PSU:
      • North-Q Black Magic 850W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG03B-F
      • Operating System:
      • Vista 64bit Ultimate
      • Monitor(s):
      • DGM 24", Dell 24" 16:9
      • Internet:
      • 20Mb

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    try gta?

  12. #12
    Senior Member Brewster0101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,614
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked
    54 times in 44 posts
    • Brewster0101's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus m5a99x evo
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX 8350
      • Memory:
      • 8GB (2x4) Corsair Vengence DDR3 1600mghz
      • Storage:
      • Western Green 3TB + Samsung 850Evo 512MB SSD, + 2TB NAS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI 280X
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AXi760
      • Case:
      • Corsair 650D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 27" 27EA63 IPS LED
      • Internet:
      • 120Mb Bt

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tidus View Post
    I like the design of the Vapor-X cards but 2GB isn't needed for a 4870 and the price will place it too close to the upcoming Radeon HD 4890.
    Is there any performance charts yet for the 4890 comparing it to a 4870 or 4850?

  13. #13
    Team HEXUS.net
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,396
    Thanks
    75
    Thanked
    411 times in 217 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 Vapor-X 2,048MB: big frame-buffer useful?

    Quote Originally Posted by Brewster0101 View Post
    Is there any performance charts yet for the 4890 comparing it to a 4870 or 4850?
    http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=17863

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-02-2009, 02:57 AM
  2. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 14-08-2008, 07:57 PM
  3. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 04-08-2008, 04:37 PM
  4. Reviews - The Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 TOXIC
    By HEXUS in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 31-07-2008, 12:11 PM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 29-07-2008, 01:20 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •