Read more.OCZ Everest-powered Octane SSDs hits the 1TB barrier.
Read more.OCZ Everest-powered Octane SSDs hits the 1TB barrier.
If only they were £100 each lol
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
dual core CPU? 512MB DRAM? So my hard drive can run Android now?
Shooty* (26-10-2011)
Why would they need this amount of processing power - or are OCZ busy trying to create a new combined cpu/memory/storage unit?The new disks are powered by a dual-core ARM CPU and include up to 512MB of DDR3 RAM.
Bet these are going to cost £1000+ - which is waaaaaaayyyyyyyy out of my price range.
Actually what I'd like is some kind of high-capacity but not necessarily high-IOPS drive - mainly to provide a very low power/no-noise storage device for a media streaming box. Oh, and given the low IOPS requirement it'd have to be cheap - say £200 for 500MB or better, (although obviously £100 for that 500MB would be preferable).
Dreaming aside, it's nice to see "consumer" SSD's hit the 1TB mark - didn't take them long did it?!![]()
In that case why only 512MB of cache, surely given the price tags of these it wouldn't be too much of a stretch to have 1 or even 2 GB
Ah yes - I'd missed out on the "High transactional performance - Optimized for 4K to 16K compressed files" bit in the article. Although it does seem a little strange - to me at least - to optimise a device to receive compressed data. I think this is something I'll have to do some research on.
That said, I'll also be looking up "End-to-end data protection (AES)" since I'm assuming that some kind of special controller would be needed.
Still be too expensive for me to afford though ...![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)