Read more.And claims this £29.99 graphics card is up to 70pc faster than the previous generation.
Read more.And claims this £29.99 graphics card is up to 70pc faster than the previous generation.
Wonder how this compares to AMD's current and nextgen APUs
They probably compared it to Intel IGP and we all know what "up to" actually means. Bet they are trying to get rid of their junk, before the next generation is released in a few months.
Good for old gen users like me. Atleast it will run some games which are unplayable in Intel HD 4400
Hm, Nvidia's marketing want to make themselves a laughing stock? Or did they compare it to the IGP of 10 years ago?
There is a bit slower than HD4600 (Haswell) according to Passmark:
Intel Iris Pro 6200 = 1,564
Intel Iris 540 = 1,483
Radeon R7 A10-7850K = 1,008
Intel HD 4600 = 711
GeForce GT 710 = 679
Intel HD 4400 = 546
I know, GPU Passmark is a poor benchmark but then nobody really reviews this end of the market. The obvious candidate would be notebookcheck.net because they seem to review almost every laptop out there, but Nvidia like to keep consumers on their toes and Geforce 710M is a totally different beast based on GF117 (Ferni), while this looks more like ONE of the 720M variants.
Surely you'd just spend 45 quid on a gddr5 730 ? Which, plays most modern games without eyecandy but at decent framerates.
I own the ATI HD 8570 wich is installed in my entertainment pc.It can go 4k 60hz.Has many features that makes it better than this one but i guess not so good in games.
I just remembered selling boatloads of HD3450 Hypermemory graphics card years ago.
Bought them for £25 and sold them for £50 on ebay.
Good times!
Nvidia launches GeForce GT 710, says its 10x better than an IGP .....WHAT A LIE! lets say we have an AMD A10 with 2133 MHZ DDR 3 what next? lets say we have Intel Iris Pro? the name 'CUDA cores' is not everything ultra, CUDA is just a name for processing units.
The title seems to be misleading compared to the body.....if you read further than then title you will read "up to 10x faster, for example, according to Nvidia".
But hey, don't let that stop you foaming at the mouth
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
Only 2GB of DDR3? I thought these low end cards sold on GB per pound, is there no 4GB DDR2 model?
scaryjim (28-01-2016)
Why a VGA output? Does anyone still use this antiquated port?
Better to have a Displayport.
Seems pritty pointless to release a dedicated graphics card with this kind of performance when just about every chip comes with integrated graphics and has done for such a long time.
You know, I'd be surprised if this is 10x better than the piddly IGP in my bay trail tablet. The entire story needs a [citation required], IMNSHO
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)