Intel Core i9-10900K, i7-10700K and i5-10600K slides leak

[HEXUS]

These 14nm 10th generation Comet Lake-S CPUs are expected on 30th April.

Read more.

[Spud1]

No last minute surprises then - Intel will still lead on gaming, AMD on highly multi threaded workloads - nothing really changes.

Maybe next year we'll see some competition and innovation in the CPU market eh

[Terbinator]

Are not getting Ice Lake at all this year for desktop?

[mers]

I think Intel are at the stage of desperation and plain out of options to compete against AMD's forward progress. Tweaking and wringing out what they can out of what chip tech they have at present. This could be their finale assault in fear of the next implementation of Ryzen that AMD will undoubtably throw into the mix. I've never been a dedicated fanboy to any chip maker from my early days of buiding PC's from 286's using Intel , AMD , Cyrix , IBM and Transmeta I think. Down the line I've usually opted for AMD on the basis of value for money plus an added abhorance for Intels underhand business practises.
Had AMD had the financial means and advertising prowess years back it might have been a different story years ago. Had it not been for American defence contracts back then AMD would have folded. I attended a computer show once donning a "T" shirt I had printed
the " Intel Inside" Logo on but had altered it to read AMD inside. There were 2 Intel reps there , one thought it funny the other was well pissed off at me , no humour some peeps.
Sorry Intel but at the moment as I sit here with my new Ryzen build which followed
my previous Phenom 11 X4 your smugness , overcharging , head hunting and desperate measures do not impress. At some point the tables will turn I'm sure, Intel has the resources and finance to do this but at the moment AMD is leading development and I'm pleased for them having been classed as second rate to many for so long. Intel need to get off their arses and produce something that is much better , we , the "Joe Public" need competition at competitional prices that are affordable encompassing all the newer tech aviliable.

[LSG501]

Um if you take out the clock speed aren't AMD nearly on a par with Intel now in most games, even more so if they've been optimised for both Intel AND AMD.

This is just more intel trying to fool the people that aren't 'tech savvy' into just buying intel due to brand awareness. Oh and LOL at the elite real world performance... is that a world where everything is single core because in my real world, most of my programs use multiple cores..

I know for a fact that these releases aren't going to change my mind from going AMD with my next build (probably 16c/32t ryzen 4xxx series), Intel will need something special for that to happen.

[ultrasbm]

How can it say that the 6C12T part is not good enough for streamers, when previous 4C8T ones were "Perfect for streamers"...

[Iota]

So 14nm process still (albeit refined now), as well as a new socket?

Sorry, if I wanted to upgrade right now I'd go AMD instead.

[Tabbykatze]

How can it say that the 6C12T part is not good enough for streamers, when previous 4C8T ones were "Perfect for streamers"...

You always shift the goal posts for a new product release else why release a new product?

[LSG501]

How can it say that the 6C12T part is not good enough for streamers, when previous 4C8T ones were "Perfect for streamers"...

It's likely down to more games making use of 4+ cores rather than the actual processor.

If the game is using 4+ cores and you only have 4c8t processor you then have no 'spare' cpu cores/threads to work on the streaming side of things.

[ultrasbm]

Does that mean then that the 3950X is for MEGA GAMERS and UBER STREAMERS? lol.

[Yoyoyo69]

I think Intel are at the stage of desperation and plain out of options to compete against AMD's forward progress. Tweaking and wringing out what they can out of what chip tech they have at present. This could be their finale assault in fear of the next implementation of Ryzen that AMD will undoubtably throw into the mix. I've never been a dedicated fanboy to any chip maker from my early days of buiding PC's from 286's using Intel , AMD , Cyrix , IBM and Transmeta I think. Down the line I've usually opted for AMD on the basis of value for money plus an added abhorance for Intels underhand business practises.
Had AMD had the financial means and advertising prowess years back it might have been a different story years ago. Had it not been for American defence contracts back then AMD would have folded. I attended a computer show once donning a "T" shirt I had printed
the " Intel Inside" Logo on but had altered it to read AMD inside. There were 2 Intel reps there , one thought it funny the other was well pissed off at me , no humour some peeps.
Sorry Intel but at the moment as I sit here with my new Ryzen build which followed
my previous Phenom 11 X4 your smugness , overcharging , head hunting and desperate measures do not impress. At some point the tables will turn I'm sure, Intel has the resources and finance to do this but at the moment AMD is leading development and I'm pleased for them having been classed as second rate to many for so long. Intel need to get off their arses and produce something that is much better , we , the "Joe Public" need competition at competitional prices that are affordable encompassing all the newer tech aviliable.

I'm very much the same.

The good thing is, when Intel finally are in a position to compete, all this bad karma will hurt them severely. Pi**ing on your fan base simply because you can exploit them, but even worse, breaking so many laws coverage that ability, sits poorly with those with this knowledge.

The when there comes a time theres a choice between Intel or AMD and practically nothing separates them, fir a long time most people would choose Intel. They've thrown that away.

I'm pleased.

[CAT-THE-FIFTH]

I think the Core i5 10600K will actually perform quite well in gaming tests against the Ryzen 7 3700X.

[edmundhonda]

I think the Core i5 10600K will actually perform quite well in gaming tests against the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Judging by the 8700k it'll probably be a couple of percent quicker most of the time, occasionally slower by a similar margin. If it launches priced like the 9600k (~£220) it'll be a good choice for gaming builds.

Well, depending on where the motherboards end up. Platform costs might bridge the gap to the 3700X.

Are not getting Ice Lake at all this year for desktop?

Is any platform getting Ice Lake this year?

[Premium]

Can't wait for an i5 that draws 150W easy...