Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Multi boot – is it worth having a tiny C drive for boot files only?

  1. #1
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    39
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Multi boot – is it worth having a tiny C drive for boot files only?

    I have a dual boot with XP & Win7 RC1 (XP = partition 0, Win7 = partition 1, Data = partition 2) and when I used the Win7 backup utility it needed to backup the whole of the XP partition as well as Win7 because presumably there are some system files on there that are required.

    I am now going to install XP and Win7 retail on a new HDD so wondered if it is worth creating a tiny partition 0 that will hold the boot files which then means that Win7 won’t need to include the XP partition when it makes a backup.
    So the new setup would be:

    Part 0 – Boot files – 100MB
    Part 1 – XP – 100GB
    Part 2 – Win7 – 100GB
    Part 3 – Data – 1.x TB

    Are there any downsides to doing it this way and do I need to do this to overcome the Win7 backup issue or is there another way?

  2. #2
    Senior[ish] Member Singh400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,935
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked
    310 times in 247 posts

    Re: Multi boot – is it worth having a tiny C drive for boot files only?

    No, I think it is a waste of time doing that. I would just stick with:
    • Partiton #1 --> Windows XP
    • Partiton #2 --> Windows 7
    • Partiton #3 --> Data

    IIRC Windows 7 creates a small hidden partition to hold boot/system files anyway.

    Can I ask why you need to keep XP and have you thought about using Windows XP Mode in Windows 7?

  3. #3
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    39
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Multi boot – is it worth having a tiny C drive for boot files only?

    Quote Originally Posted by Singh400 View Post
    IIRC Windows 7 creates a small hidden partition to hold boot/system files anyway.
    I don’t believe that is true as when I look at my drive using Disk Management there is no hidden partition showing.

  4. #4
    Senior[ish] Member Singh400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,935
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked
    310 times in 247 posts

    Re: Multi boot – is it worth having a tiny C drive for boot files only?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cuervo View Post
    I don’t believe that is true as when I look at my drive using Disk Management there is no hidden partition showing.
    Unless you installed Windows 7 differently, by default a hidden system partition is made.

  5. #5
    Get in the van. Fraz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    2,919
    Thanks
    283
    Thanked
    396 times in 230 posts
    • Fraz's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A-UD5
      • CPU:
      • Watercooled i7-980X @ 4.2 GHz
      • Memory:
      • 24GB Crucial DDR3-1333
      • Storage:
      • 240 GB Vertex2E + 2 TB of Disk
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Water-cooled Sapphire 7970 @ 1175/1625
      • PSU:
      • Enermax Modu87+
      • Case:
      • Corsair 700D
      • Operating System:
      • Linux Mint 12 / Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 30" 3008WFP and two Dell 24" 2412M
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 60 Mbps

    Re: Multi boot – is it worth having a tiny C drive for boot files only?

    Save yourself the trouble, and just don't bother with XP

  6. #6
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: Multi boot – is it worth having a tiny C drive for boot files only?

    Singh400 is correct: Windows 7 does make a 100MB partition, by default at least but it isn't assigned a drive letter so it won't show up in My Computer. Personally, I'd put Windows 7 at the edge (start) of the drive rather that XP as that part of the disk is faster and I'm assuming 7 is your main OS. Also depending on what you need XP for you could run it in a VM (or XP mode if you have 7 pro or higher).
    Last edited by watercooled; 03-02-2010 at 03:36 PM.

  7. #7
    Get in the van. Fraz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    2,919
    Thanks
    283
    Thanked
    396 times in 230 posts
    • Fraz's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A-UD5
      • CPU:
      • Watercooled i7-980X @ 4.2 GHz
      • Memory:
      • 24GB Crucial DDR3-1333
      • Storage:
      • 240 GB Vertex2E + 2 TB of Disk
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Water-cooled Sapphire 7970 @ 1175/1625
      • PSU:
      • Enermax Modu87+
      • Case:
      • Corsair 700D
      • Operating System:
      • Linux Mint 12 / Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 30" 3008WFP and two Dell 24" 2412M
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 60 Mbps

    Re: Multi boot – is it worth having a tiny C drive for boot files only?

    Quote Originally Posted by watercooled View Post
    Personally, I'd put Windows 7 at the centre of the drive ... as that part of the disk is faster
    Someone needs to re-take rotational mechanics 101.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    492
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    106 times in 80 posts

    Re: Multi boot – is it worth having a tiny C drive for boot files only?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cuervo View Post
    I have a dual boot with XP & Win7 RC1 (XP = partition 0, Win7 = partition 1, Data = partition 2) and when I used the Win7 backup utility it needed to backup the whole of the XP partition as well as Win7 because presumably there are some system files on there that are required.

    I am now going to install XP and Win7 retail on a new HDD so wondered if it is worth creating a tiny partition 0 that will hold the boot files which then means that Win7 won’t need to include the XP partition when it makes a backup.
    So the new setup would be:

    Part 0 – Boot files – 100MB
    Part 1 – XP – 100GB
    Part 2 – Win7 – 100GB
    Part 3 – Data – 1.x TB

    Are there any downsides to doing it this way and do I need to do this to overcome the Win7 backup issue or is there another way?
    Win 7 will automatically create the 100MB boot partition on a blank hard drive, but if there's a pre-existing formatted partition *at the start of the drive* it will omit this step and create a folder called \RECOVERY in that partition instead. I guess in your case this would be your XP partition, hence why Win 7 wants to image the whole thing, in order to preserve your boot/recovery files.

    I think the way you'd need to get around this on a new drive is:

    1. Install XP first (you'd want to do this anyway, to avoid dual-boot complications). Create *three* partitions during XP setup (100GB/100GB/800GB, assuming a 1TB drive), delete the first one completely leaving 100GB empty space at the "front" of the drive, then install XP to the second partition (the third will be your shared data volume).

    2. Run 7 setup, create a new partition in the empty space, install 7 to that (it should also create the 100MB boot/recovery partition at the beginning of this space).

    I should add I've never actually tried this, so no guarantees, but I *think* it should work... at least with a blank hard drive you've only wasted a bit of time if it all goes pear-shaped.

    Alternatively, you could make life much easier and run XP in a VM, unless you need the performance of a native hardware installation for some reason...

  9. #9
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: Multi boot – is it worth having a tiny C drive for boot files only?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fraz View Post
    Someone needs to re-take rotational mechanics 101.
    D'oh! I meant the edge of the disk of course, but I did say the start which is correct. Edited to save confusion...

    And I agree with CaptainCrash about the partitioning etc - that's the way I'd do it.

  10. #10
    Senior[ish] Member Singh400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,935
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked
    310 times in 247 posts

    Re: Multi boot – is it worth having a tiny C drive for boot files only?

    Quote Originally Posted by CaptainCrash View Post
    Alternatively, you could make life much easier and run XP in a VM, unless you need the performance of a native hardware installation for some reason...
    Ding ding ding. We have a winner. Windows XP Mode is the way forward here.

  11. #11
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    39
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Multi boot – is it worth having a tiny C drive for boot files only?

    Quote Originally Posted by Singh400 View Post
    Unless you installed Windows 7 differently, by default a hidden system partition is made.
    I have a multi-partition setup so I don’t have the hidden Win7 partition which ‘Disk Management’ confirms. It’s good to know about that though for future reference.

    Quote Originally Posted by watercooled View Post
    Personally, I'd put Windows 7 at the edge (start) of the drive rather that XP as that part of the disk is faster and I'm assuming 7 is your main OS.
    The difference in performance between the first and second 60GB chunks of the drive will be negligible so I’m not going to let that unduly influence my decision.

  12. #12
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: Multi boot – is it worth having a tiny C drive for boot files only?

    People seem to have overlooked/missed what I mentioned earlier (post 6)...

    Quote Originally Posted by watercooled View Post
    Also depending on what you need XP for you could run it in a VM (or XP mode if you have 7 pro or higher).
    Last edited by watercooled; 03-02-2010 at 04:19 PM.

  13. #13
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    39
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Multi boot – is it worth having a tiny C drive for boot files only?

    Quote Originally Posted by watercooled View Post
    People seem to have overlooked/missed what I mentioned earlier (post 6)...
    I ignored it because it doesn’t address the question that I asked but thanks for the suggestion anyway.

  14. #14
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: Multi boot – is it worth having a tiny C drive for boot files only?

    Sorry that wasn't meant for you.

  15. #15
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    39
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Multi boot – is it worth having a tiny C drive for boot files only?

    Quote Originally Posted by CaptainCrash View Post
    I think the way you'd need to get around this on a new drive is:

    1. Install XP first (you'd want to do this anyway, to avoid dual-boot complications). Create *three* partitions during XP setup (100GB/100GB/800GB, assuming a 1TB drive), delete the first one completely leaving 100GB empty space at the "front" of the drive, then install XP to the second partition (the third will be your shared data volume).

    2. Run 7 setup, create a new partition in the empty space, install 7 to that (it should also create the 100MB boot/recovery partition at the beginning of this space).
    Thanks for the suggestion, it seems sound in theory and will probably give it a go tomorrow.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Looking Through Windows
    By Paul Adams in forum Software
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 19-10-2018, 09:07 AM
  2. Boot drive failure
    By Kiro-San in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 21-06-2009, 09:53 PM
  3. Free extra space? check this!!!
    By DR in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 145
    Last Post: 01-10-2005, 02:08 PM
  4. SATA Boot Drive with IDE Slave [abit]
    By mr_tim in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 26-12-2003, 05:56 PM
  5. multi boot options
    By robbiehall in forum Software
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 27-10-2003, 08:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •