Does anyone have any experience of comparing the Windows and the command lines verisons of the seti client when using ME, or am I limited to the Windows version?
Does anyone have any experience of comparing the Windows and the command lines verisons of the seti client when using ME, or am I limited to the Windows version?
do you mean windows ME? or CE?... i would, personally, use the Command Line version of the client, matched with SetiDriver (have a look on google), as this is what i do, and the CL client gives best performance, and the setiDriver allows me to cache work units, and hide the command line client
mark
I mean ME. Both clients work but I haven't got the patience to find out which is quicker.
you have no patience but u crunch?
I can crunch in my sleep
the command line version is quicker than the graphical version. about 10% faster apparently.
i use it with setispy
Join the HEXUS Folding at Home Team!!
Welcome to HEXUS! - Read this if you're new!
hexus trust | joshwaller.co.uk | tea review
Okay I have started to use the Command line client now but how can I get it to automatically close when I am closing Windows down?
Seticommander, in my opinion, is the best seti cacher.
http://seti.hfr.free.fr/seticommande...icmd2.34en.exe
Comes with all you need.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)