Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Compact Flash in Raid faster than SSD?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ipswich
    Posts
    236
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    10 times in 7 posts
    • Aden's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Biostar TP45 HP
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ stock
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 2gb Corsair XMS2 800mhz
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 500gb 7200.11
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 8600GTS @ Stock
      • PSU:
      • be-quiet 550watt
      • Case:
      • Antec 900
      • Operating System:
      • XP Media Center & Seven x64 7232
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" acer @ 1920 x 1200 & 15" 1024 x 768
      • Internet:
      • Supanet supposed 8mb - 1.3mb

    Compact Flash in Raid faster than SSD?

    Looking at the Quad-CF Pci Controller which I could use with four fast Compact Flash Cards all in Raid 0 for fast speeds right?

    I'm looking at 4gb Compact Flash Cards which have a read/write speed of about 40 / 45mb/s, so surely, in theory four of them in Raid 0 would be as fast as this, if not faster?

    Comparing 4 x 4gb Compact Flash in Raid 0 to my 500gb Seagate Barracuda which would be faster for booting XP.

    I'd like a really fast way to boot into XP which would have just the basics on - messenger and firefox.

    But should I stick with my Hard Drive (I have two, one will be for vista + programs, one for files + perhaps XP) or get this DIY SSD Controller?

  2. #2
    cat /dev/null streetster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,138
    Thanks
    119
    Thanked
    100 times in 82 posts
    • streetster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P7P55D-E
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 750 2.67 @ 4.0Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Corsair XMS DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 2x1TB Drives [RAID0]
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2xSapphire HD 4870 512MB CrossFireX
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Black Widow
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • DELL U2311
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 50Mb

    Re: Compact Flash in Raid faster than SSD?

    how about buy one of these for £60 - 30GB OCZ SSD?

    less hassle, and you can always get another one @ £60 and RAID0 them for potentially 310mb/s read speed

    16gb really isnt much, 60gb would let you install xp and some apps and few games and leave your regular HDD for music/videos/etc

  3. #3
    Gentoo Ricer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    11,048
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    944 times in 704 posts
    • aidanjt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Strix Z370-G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-8700K
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB Corsiar LPX 3000C15
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 960 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0
      • PSU:
      • EVGA G3 750W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define C Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus MG279Q
      • Internet:
      • 240mbps Virgin Cable

    Re: Compact Flash in Raid faster than SSD?

    Solid state boot drives isn't going to help Windows much with loading. Most of Windows loading time is spent initalising drivers and services.
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    ...every time Creative bring out a new card range their advertising makes it sound like they have discovered a way to insert a thousand Chuck Norris super dwarfs in your ears...

  4. #4
    WEEEEEEEEEEEEE! MadduckUK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lytham St. Annes
    Posts
    17,297
    Thanks
    653
    Thanked
    1,579 times in 1,005 posts
    • MadduckUK's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5 3600
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200 DDR4
      • Storage:
      • 1x480GB SSD, 1x 2TB Hybrid, 1x 3TB Rust Spinner
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon 5700XT
      • PSU:
      • Corsair TX750w
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Enthoo Evolv mATX
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung SJ55W, DELL S2409W
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet 80

    Re: Compact Flash in Raid faster than SSD?

    Aden - if you just want a fast boot into msn and firefox have you considered a lightweight linux? that would cost you nothing or even a very stripped down winxp.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ephesians
    Do not be drunk with wine, which will ruin you, but be filled with the Spirit
    Vodka

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ipswich
    Posts
    236
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    10 times in 7 posts
    • Aden's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Biostar TP45 HP
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ stock
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 2gb Corsair XMS2 800mhz
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 500gb 7200.11
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 8600GTS @ Stock
      • PSU:
      • be-quiet 550watt
      • Case:
      • Antec 900
      • Operating System:
      • XP Media Center & Seven x64 7232
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" acer @ 1920 x 1200 & 15" 1024 x 768
      • Internet:
      • Supanet supposed 8mb - 1.3mb

    Re: Compact Flash in Raid faster than SSD?

    Quote Originally Posted by MadduckUK View Post
    Aden - if you just want a fast boot into msn and firefox have you considered a lightweight linux? that would cost you nothing or even a very stripped down winxp.
    Perhaps a stripped down XP would be better then.. as I'll be using Vista for primary os, XP jsut for a quick check of the emails, forums + messenger in the morning etc.

  6. #6
    cat /dev/null streetster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,138
    Thanks
    119
    Thanked
    100 times in 82 posts
    • streetster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P7P55D-E
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 750 2.67 @ 4.0Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Corsair XMS DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 2x1TB Drives [RAID0]
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2xSapphire HD 4870 512MB CrossFireX
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Black Widow
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • DELL U2311
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 50Mb

    Re: Compact Flash in Raid faster than SSD?

    why dont you put your pc in sleep/suspend-to-ram rather than turning it off if you want a quick boot in the mornings?

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ipswich
    Posts
    236
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    10 times in 7 posts
    • Aden's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Biostar TP45 HP
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ stock
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 2gb Corsair XMS2 800mhz
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 500gb 7200.11
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 8600GTS @ Stock
      • PSU:
      • be-quiet 550watt
      • Case:
      • Antec 900
      • Operating System:
      • XP Media Center & Seven x64 7232
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" acer @ 1920 x 1200 & 15" 1024 x 768
      • Internet:
      • Supanet supposed 8mb - 1.3mb

    Re: Compact Flash in Raid faster than SSD?

    Quote Originally Posted by streetster View Post
    why dont you put your pc in sleep/suspend-to-ram rather than turning it off if you want a quick boot in the mornings?
    Because I expect it'll be damn noisy with all my fans blowing even on Low all night, especially 3 feet away from my bed.

  8. #8
    Does he need a reason? Funkstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    19,874
    Thanks
    629
    Thanked
    962 times in 813 posts
    • Funkstar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte EG45M-DS2H
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Quad Q9550 (2.83GHz)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB OCZ PC2-6400C5 800MHz Quad Channel
      • Storage:
      • 650GB Western Digital Caviar Blue
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 512MB ATI Radeon HD4550
      • PSU:
      • Antec 350W 80+ Efficient PSU
      • Case:
      • Antec NSK1480 Slim Mini Desktop Case
      • Operating System:
      • Vista Ultimate 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407 + 2408 monitors
      • Internet:
      • Zen 8mb

    Re: Compact Flash in Raid faster than SSD?

    Quote Originally Posted by Aden View Post
    Because I expect it'll be damn noisy with all my fans blowing even on Low all night, especially 3 feet away from my bed.
    If your PC is asleep, your fans shouldn't be going, so it shouldn't make any noise.

  9. #9
    I'm ITX
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    2,415
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked
    159 times in 148 posts

    Re: Compact Flash in Raid faster than SSD?

    When my PC sleeps it's silent, no fans move at all!

    It's 4.98*

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Here at the moment
    Posts
    484
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked
    32 times in 28 posts

    Re: Compact Flash in Raid faster than SSD?

    Quote Originally Posted by Aden View Post
    ... I'm looking at 4gb Compact Flash Cards...
    If you do go down that route, aviod Kingston cards like the Plague! Very unreliable and nowhere near as fast as they claim to be.

    Cant go wrong with.. http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/4GB-S...133x-Superfast
    I've just upgraded from them to Extreme IV 16GBs and they are like rockets! Beware the 4GB & 8GB versions only quote 40MB/sec for some odd reason, 16GB quotes 45MB/sec (havent got near write speeds like that as the D300 won't let me, but read speeds are pretty close). Cost a bloody fortune though, that OCZ SSD and/or stripped out XP/Linux would probs be more cost effective.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ipswich
    Posts
    236
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    10 times in 7 posts
    • Aden's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Biostar TP45 HP
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ stock
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 2gb Corsair XMS2 800mhz
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 500gb 7200.11
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 8600GTS @ Stock
      • PSU:
      • be-quiet 550watt
      • Case:
      • Antec 900
      • Operating System:
      • XP Media Center & Seven x64 7232
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" acer @ 1920 x 1200 & 15" 1024 x 768
      • Internet:
      • Supanet supposed 8mb - 1.3mb

    Re: Compact Flash in Raid faster than SSD?

    Quote Originally Posted by mehmeh View Post
    If you do go down that route, aviod Kingston cards like the Plague! Very unreliable and nowhere near as fast as they claim to be.

    Cant go wrong with.. http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/4GB-S...133x-Superfast
    I've just upgraded from them to Extreme IV 16GBs and they are like rockets! Beware the 4GB & 8GB versions only quote 40MB/sec for some odd reason, 16GB quotes 45MB/sec (havent got near write speeds like that as the D300 won't let me, but read speeds are pretty close). Cost a bloody fortune though, that OCZ SSD and/or stripped out XP/Linux would probs be more cost effective.
    Aight. I'll just nlite me an XP install aswell as my Vista one

  12. #12
    Jay
    Jay is offline
    Gentlemen.. we're history Jay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Jita
    Posts
    8,365
    Thanks
    304
    Thanked
    568 times in 409 posts

    Re: Compact Flash in Raid faster than SSD?

    if you can, make sure the card is UDMA
    □ΞVΞ□

  13. #13
    Technojunkie
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Up North
    Posts
    2,580
    Thanks
    239
    Thanked
    213 times in 138 posts

    Re: Compact Flash in Raid faster than SSD?

    Quote Originally Posted by aidanjt View Post
    Solid state boot drives isn't going to help Windows much with loading. Most of Windows loading time is spent initalising drivers and services.
    Thats so wrong. The very first thing you notice with SSDs is the massive speedup in boot time.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    423
    Thanks
    63
    Thanked
    18 times in 17 posts
    • GaryRW's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte P35C DS3R
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ 3ghz
      • Memory:
      • DDR2 4gb
      • Storage:
      • Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 8800GT
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520w
      • Case:
      • Antec P182
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 2032BW

    Re: Compact Flash in Raid faster than SSD?

    Quote Originally Posted by PeterStoba View Post
    When my PC sleeps it's silent, no fans move at all!
    Ditto here - when it's asleep, it may as well be off as far as noise is concerned. (not sure about power though)

    & even if SSD's do massively speed up boot time, I'd be surprised if it beat the few seconds it takes to wake up from sleep state.

  15. #15
    Does he need a reason? Funkstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    19,874
    Thanks
    629
    Thanked
    962 times in 813 posts
    • Funkstar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte EG45M-DS2H
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Quad Q9550 (2.83GHz)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB OCZ PC2-6400C5 800MHz Quad Channel
      • Storage:
      • 650GB Western Digital Caviar Blue
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 512MB ATI Radeon HD4550
      • PSU:
      • Antec 350W 80+ Efficient PSU
      • Case:
      • Antec NSK1480 Slim Mini Desktop Case
      • Operating System:
      • Vista Ultimate 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407 + 2408 monitors
      • Internet:
      • Zen 8mb

    Re: Compact Flash in Raid faster than SSD?

    Being asleep does still draw power, it can be quite a lot too considdering it isn't doing anything.

    Hybernation on the other hand, uses a lot less, but due to the way PC power supplies work, electricity is still being used. Zak33 has done a lot of testing with a power meter, it's one of his pet subjects.

    Taking a PC out of hybernation with an SSD would see a massive speed up I think, especially as it is just loading what was in your RAM back into RAM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Pro 35 RAID problem
    By OldRoy in forum abit.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-03-2008, 03:30 PM
  2. RAID Information
    By carbon8ed in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 28-07-2007, 06:27 PM
  3. Canon Ixus 400 / Compact Flash Card
    By Sinizter in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-02-2004, 10:02 PM
  4. Compact Flash Cards
    By Zaphan58 in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 26-11-2003, 01:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •