Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 17 to 32 of 55

Thread: Pushing the limits of 4 cylinders?

  1. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    12,196
    Thanks
    913
    Thanked
    605 times in 424 posts
    Look at where his power is richie, he dont know what torque is

  2. #18
    Confused...
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    3.2 GHz
    Posts
    396
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • hotpurple's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5Q Pro
      • CPU:
      • Core 2 Quad Q6600
      • Memory:
      • 8Gb Corsair XMS PC6400
      • Storage:
      • 640 GB Samsung Spinpoint F1
      • Graphics card(s):
      • HD 4850 Passive
      • PSU:
      • 580W Hiper
      • Case:
      • Antec P180
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 223BW
      • Internet:
      • What's the internet?
    Depends if you can keep your engine in the power band. Torque is only really important on a very twisty track where you will dip out of the power band of your engine.

    As we all know, power is torque * rotational speed. A high power output will lead to better accelleration as the engine is doing more work, and hence giving the car more kinetic energy. So torque is really only important for giving you a good power output.

    Chris
    I own a PC that changes regularly, so I don't bother putting anything in here...

  3. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    705
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Originally posted by hotpurple
    Depends if you can keep your engine in the power band. Torque is only really important on a very twisty track where you will dip out of the power band of your engine.

    So are you saying it IS important (like here) or its NOT important (like earlier) ??


    What you want is a maximum but flat torque output spread as much as possible over the rev range.... Say (for examples sake) 325lb.ft from 2500rpm - 6000rpm (red lines at 6500 or so)


    Fun Not Frags - www.gsvgaming.net

  4. #20
    Confused...
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    3.2 GHz
    Posts
    396
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • hotpurple's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5Q Pro
      • CPU:
      • Core 2 Quad Q6600
      • Memory:
      • 8Gb Corsair XMS PC6400
      • Storage:
      • 640 GB Samsung Spinpoint F1
      • Graphics card(s):
      • HD 4850 Passive
      • PSU:
      • 580W Hiper
      • Case:
      • Antec P180
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 223BW
      • Internet:
      • What's the internet?
    That would give you a nice responsive engine yes. Sorry, I did confuse matters a bit there. I meant torque is not important on it's own, it has to be combined with rotational speed to create power.

    Race engines take the approach of lots of revs, not much torque and still produce a lot of power. A city car on the other hand would require lots of torque low down in the rev range to enable quick getaways and easy round town driving.

    With the correct gear ratios it is possible to keep the engine on cam and in the required rev range to produce meaningful power output, whilst also navigating a twisty track, however it would probably be a lot easier for a novice driver to have a slightly detuned engine that had a wider power band with a lower ultimate power output.

    Dealing with gear ratios is very important as it is quite possible to tune an engine so much that changing gear drops it out of the power band, which is quite funny to watch.

    Chris
    I own a PC that changes regularly, so I don't bother putting anything in here...

  5. #21
    HEXUS.timelord. Zak33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    I'm a Jessie
    Posts
    35,185
    Thanks
    3,126
    Thanked
    3,179 times in 1,926 posts
    • Zak33's system
      • Storage:
      • Kingston HyperX SSD, Hitachi 1Tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 1050
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 800w
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT01
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTC uber speedy
    5labby mate....while you (rightly) defend your much loved Volvo.....it sadly has NO COMPARISON to the Honda unit that Hotpurple is on about....

    they have to be driven to be believed. Honda know engines in a way Volvo DREAM ABOUT

    However.....they dont suit lots of drivers...lots of revs on those 16valvers.....the torque is HIGH UP....hence a shorter gearbox etc.


    And you have one vital over it....

    YOUR OLD SWEDISH BEAST IS REAR WHEEL DRIVE (just don't mention the leaf-spring rear suspension, from just before horse and carts were a new thing )

    Quote Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
    "The second you aren't paying attention to the tool you're using, it will take your fingers from you. It does not know sympathy." |
    "If you don't gaffer it, it will gaffer you" | "Belt and braces"

  6. #22
    Administrator Moby-Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    There's no place like ::1 (IPv6 version)
    Posts
    10,665
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked
    384 times in 313 posts
    Dealing with gear ratios is very important as it is quite possible to tune an engine so much that changing gear drops it out of the power band, which is quite funny to watch.
    that can happen in my 200sx if you dont change gear quick enough when booting it
    my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net

  7. #23
    Where'd my avator go?
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    on a suicide bid, albeit a slow one.
    Posts
    315
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Originally posted by [GSV]Trig
    Any car in my eyes should have at least 100Bhp/litre to be worth its salt,


    If it's not making 1bhp per 1kg, I'm not interested. The 'toy' I'll be getting soon will have 150bhp/ltr. w00tage.

  8. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    12,196
    Thanks
    913
    Thanked
    605 times in 424 posts

  9. #25
    Senior Member Tumble's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Right in the Pickle Barrel
    Posts
    7,217
    Thanks
    271
    Thanked
    315 times in 217 posts
    hehe mine's got loadsa torque.... lovely stuff for getting out of mudholes.... dunno bout the redline tho - I *think* its at about 2500-3.. but it sounds waaay too scary up there to try, although the turbo does sound sweet

    Quote Originally Posted by The Quentos
    "My udder is growing. Quick pass me the parsely sauce." Said Oliver.

  10. #26
    TiG
    TiG is offline
    Walk a mile in other peoples shoes...
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Questioning it all
    Posts
    6,213
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked
    47 times in 42 posts
    I'm dead on the 100bhp per little, 180bhp for 1.8ltrs. Tho its not all about figures guys, its about how you feel in your car when you drive it.

    If thats anything that i've learnt here its that figures means for squat, What you need to do is experience the feel of car/engine/breaks or whatever so you've got a true appreciation of them.

    As explaination and words are NO comparision to trying to BOOT a car round the track etc.

    Although it was nice to see a bit of a lively discussion on here, first one in a while

    TiG
    -- Hexus Meets Rock! --

  11. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    705
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I feel positively underpowered around here with my lowly 65BHP/litre


    Fun Not Frags - www.gsvgaming.net

  12. #28
    Blue Army Member spazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Sonning, Reading, Berks
    Posts
    1,939
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    10 times in 9 posts
    • spazman's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte DS3
      • CPU:
      • Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 2GB Corsair PC6400
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 320gb RAID 0 , 250gb IDE , 160gb IDE, 400bg USB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 7900GX2
      • PSU:
      • 750watt Enermax
      • Case:
      • Akasa Eclipse
      • Monitor(s):
      • 19" LCD 19" CRT
      • Internet:
      • Be Unlimited
    ive seen the Top Secret Honda Civic Type-R on men and motors and that was pushing 510bhp from a 1.8 turbo vtec lump. Running like 23psi or something mad like that, i dont think it was road legal though for some reason. Also the most powerfull evo in the world is like 774bhp, that 2.2 4 cylinder. Tuned by some UK company. Thats crazy .
    Last edited by spazman; 27-11-2003 at 12:32 PM.
    NES, SNES, N64, GameCube, Wii, GBA, DS, PSone, PS2, PSP, PS3 60gb, XBOX, XBOX 360, Master System, Game Gear, Mega Drive, Saturn, Dreamcast, PC Engine, Neo Geo CD

  13. #29
    Where'd my avator go?
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    on a suicide bid, albeit a slow one.
    Posts
    315
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Norris Designs. And the Top Fuel Civic Type RR has well over 500bhp, too.

    The 'drag' Civics in the use run 900+bhp from 4pot vtecs.

  14. #30
    Va Va Voom Lowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Newcastle Under Lyme
    Posts
    6,748
    Thanks
    323
    Thanked
    358 times in 266 posts
    • Lowe's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z97MX Gaming 5
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 4690K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical
      • Storage:
      • Crucial M550 256GB and 1TB spindle drive
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Palit Geforce GTX1080 Jetstream
      • PSU:
      • EVGA 600w
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Silencio 352 m-ATX
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7/Mac OSX
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" 1080p AOC, Oculus Rift CV1
      • Internet:
      • 200mb Virgin VIVID
    112.2 bhp per litre here.

    I'm turbo'd though so I guess I don't count.

  15. #31
    Confused...
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    3.2 GHz
    Posts
    396
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • hotpurple's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5Q Pro
      • CPU:
      • Core 2 Quad Q6600
      • Memory:
      • 8Gb Corsair XMS PC6400
      • Storage:
      • 640 GB Samsung Spinpoint F1
      • Graphics card(s):
      • HD 4850 Passive
      • PSU:
      • 580W Hiper
      • Case:
      • Antec P180
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 223BW
      • Internet:
      • What's the internet?
    Getting high volumetric efficiency with a turbo is the easy way out. When combined with a good engine in the first place though they can be very good.

    Chris
    I own a PC that changes regularly, so I don't bother putting anything in here...

  16. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    705
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Supercharging mine comes up with 417BHP and 380-ish lb.ft all at 6psi


    Fun Not Frags - www.gsvgaming.net

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •