Originally Posted by
Nick
Hi PCuser21,
If I may, I'll give you a couple of tips.
First, saying that you want the games and in return you'll write a review just isn't going to go down well with many sites. 90% of a PR dude's job is making sure he's not sending precious copies of his game to some bloke who's just going to keep it and never write anything about it. 10% of my job is working with these PR dudes to secure code, so as an editor I'm not going to be too inclined to send a game to someone who's stated motivation is to get games for free.
Second, judging by the few lines in this thread, you need to work on your grammar. Sorry if this sounds harsh but take this sentence:
What that says is you wrote a game and you're going to send me a sample of a review of it. I know that's not what you mean but there are literally thousands of folks out there asking the same thing as you, if you're going to secure any work, you need to be better than them.
Third, don't expect any AAA titles until you've written several reviews to an acceptable standard and delivered them by the set deadline. This means you'll get budget re-releases and relatively unknown games by small publishers. You'll get a lot of stuff you don't even have an interest in playing. Can you force yourself to play Pro Cycling Manager for 15 hours to see as much as the game has to offer?
Given that many sites pay around $15-20 for a review, you're getting a good deal if you think one review pays for keeping the game. Websites know this, so you can expect them to demand a high standard and any editor worth his salt will make you re-write and re-write a piece until he is happy... Seeing as you're getting roughly $50 of gear for doing something he normally pays $20 for, he's going to want quality and to not have to sub-edit your work.
All in all, it's not the bed of roses that everyone thinks it is as Steven W will no doubt agree.
Hope this helps!
Nick