Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 17 to 32 of 47

Thread: er 'great' Tax on 'peace and quiet' revealed

  1. #17
    Senior Member mcmiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,404
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked
    50 times in 39 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    Yup. It's just a fairer revaluation - if you've taken a small house and turned it into a mansion with extensions then you should pay more council tax.

    Likewise discounts for living in less nice areas is also sensible - in fact it's practically in place already, because houses in nice areas sell for more thus have higher value so will come up higher in a revaluation.
    ah but supposedly there going to include what you own in your house as well, so you may live in a rubbish area but saved up and spent loads on a nice tele, sofa etc.. and then get taxed it on it, this whole idea smacks of communism tbh

  2. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    155
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Surely council tax is supposed to pay for the local amenities I use - police, schools, street cleaners etc.?

    So what the heck has the value of my property got to do with the amount of resources I use?!

    Anyone who rioted when the Tories introduced the 'Poll Tax' and who doesn't get on the streets if this comes in is a flippin' hypocrite.

    W.

  3. #19
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,025
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    3,383 times in 2,720 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish
    Um Waka, this is the complete opposite of a poll tax, in fact you are arguing to make it more like a poll tax! The poll tax was based on everyone paying the same amount - you are arguing that everyone should pay the same amount regardless of house value

    Making people with higher value houses pay more is just a means of distrubuting the costs more 'fairly' across those using the services.

    I can't believe they would ever bother with contents - that sounds like pure scaremongering and just isn't enforcable.

  4. #20
    radix lecti dave87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,806
    Thanks
    657
    Thanked
    931 times in 634 posts
    • dave87's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus
      • CPU:
      • i5 3470k under Corsair H80 WC
      • Memory:
      • 8gb DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 240gb SSD + 120gb SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus HD7950
      • PSU:
      • XFX 600w Modular
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-A05FNB + Acoustipack
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2x Dell S2309W (1920x1080)
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity Option 2
    If Waka's point is true, then the rich should pay less.

    Think about it - the rich are more likely to have private healthcare, are likely to be members of private gyms instead of council facilities, and are less likely to be receiving any type of tax credit. So they actually cost less, than say those who use the NHS more (and if the government is to be believed, this is smokers drinkers etc).

    The rich already pay more income tax (highest tax band takes 40%), and are likely to pay more VAT by virtue of spending more. Same goes for fuel/road taxes if they have big cars.

    Dave
    Last edited by dave87; 19-02-2007 at 03:36 PM.

  5. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,013
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    20 times in 18 posts
    • excalibur2's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Z77-d3h
      • CPU:
      • Intel 2500k @4.4ghz
      • Memory:
      • 2X4gb Corsair Vengeance
      • Storage:
      • WD 2tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • R290
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 750
      • Case:
      • Haf-x tower
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell u2410
      • Internet:
      • broadband with Plusnet
    When will people learn that when you vote Labour, you vote for higher taxes and a nanny state.............Oh wait! the ways things are going make that a "1984 nanny state".

  6. #22
    Senior Member Kezzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,863
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    It's unavoidable, Orwellian theories were correct.

  7. #23
    No more Mr Nice Guy. Nick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    10,021
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    316 times in 141 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Kezzer View Post
    I thought increased taxes were to improve the quality of living? If so, why are people complaining? To remove an annoyance for a fee is certainly worth it? Plus, you don't HAVE to live in the areas which will have extra tax.

    Personally I'd prefer to pay more in house prices than in tax, but I'm just pointing out the purposes in tax and how it's most probably a justified course of action.
    So if I spend £800 doing up my kitchen, I should now pay more tax because I've got a nice kitchen?

    Let's just extrapolate that a bit.

    If I wear Tescos jeans, then I should surely pay less tax than the guy wearing Levi's 501s?

    If I drive a C reg Vauxhall Astra, I should pay less tax than the guy with a 54 plate Mondeo?

    If I go to Southend for a week on holiday each year, I should pay less than the guy who hits the Alps in winter and Barbados in summer?

    If I run two LCD screens on my PC, that should cost me more in tax that if I ran a 14" green screen CRT?

    The Government already cop a load more tax with stamp duty on house prices as houses within easy reach of amenities in quite areas command much higher prices than the exact same house elsewhere.

    Slap a house in a cul de sac and it's worth up to £10,000 more than the same house on a through road.

    Throw in shops nearby, good road and rail links and decent local schools and you're talking an extra £20,000 or so.

    That all belts through to the government on stamp duty.

    If the buggers REALLY want to see some instant cash, how about scrapping a stupidly expensive and near impossible to enforce tax and do something to help first time buyers... How about a build to lease scheme that provides affordable housing to new buyers?

    Cos then the government will creaming off their percentage of stamp duty and getting folk on the housing ladder.

    Sure, there's loads of reasons why this might not work, but hey, I just come up with the ideas, it's up to them to make 'em go!
    Quote Originally Posted by Dareos View Post
    "OH OOOOHH oOOHHHHHHHOOHHHHHHH FILL ME WITH YOUR.... eeww not the stuff from the lab"

  8. #24
    Senior Member Kezzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,863
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    A totalitarian governmental structure. Society lose.


  9. #25
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,025
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    3,383 times in 2,720 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish
    Quote Originally Posted by excalibur2 View Post
    When will people learn that when you vote Labour, you vote for higher taxes and a nanny state.............Oh wait! the ways things are going make that a "1984 nanny state".
    This conservative party political broadcast brought to you by...

  10. #26
    Senior Member mcmiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,404
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked
    50 times in 39 posts
    nick they are doing joint ownership scheme in the home counties, where by you buy a percentage in the house i think the minimum is 25% whether this a good to get involved idk as they may limit you to how much you can buy or you may have probs if you want to sell the house and no one wants the same percentage as you have got.
    The real issue with housing is the buy to rent landlords they pay stupid amounts of money for houses pushing the house prices up because they know that they dont have to worry just so long as theres someone renting from them, they also have the habit of turning decent houses into crappy 1 or 2 bedroom flats that are vastly overpriced

  11. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    524
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    40 times in 34 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Waka View Post
    Anyone who rioted when the Tories introduced the 'Poll Tax' and who doesn't get on the streets if this comes in is a flippin' hypocrite.

    W.
    I think you'll find this has already been in place since the demise of the poll tax (introduced in 1993 according to wikipedia), and it was the Tories who introduced it.
    To propose demonstrating about this is pointless, as you are 15 years too late!

    A lot of people on here seem to be unaware of what council tax is, or how it is evaluated.
    The council has a budget for the year, to be raised by council tax. This is then split proportionally between all the properties in the councils area, where properties in different bands get a different ratio of the total amount.

    The bands currently used are for the most part based on property valuations from 1991. All the story above is referring to is re-valuing houses, so that they are in the correct band (some people will move up, others down).

    This will have no bearing on the total amount raised by council tax (this may be increased separately, but is not related to this issue), it will simply change the ratio paid by some people. Most people will probably be unaffected.

  12. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,013
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    20 times in 18 posts
    • excalibur2's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Z77-d3h
      • CPU:
      • Intel 2500k @4.4ghz
      • Memory:
      • 2X4gb Corsair Vengeance
      • Storage:
      • WD 2tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • R290
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 750
      • Case:
      • Haf-x tower
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell u2410
      • Internet:
      • broadband with Plusnet
    Quote Originally Posted by Kezzer View Post
    It's unavoidable, Orwellian theories were correct.
    Well George Orwell, although being a socialist, was probably warning us of what to expect with a future Labour government....eh
    But at least in principle the Conservative are for less state intervention and for more freedom for the individual.

  13. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,013
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    20 times in 18 posts
    • excalibur2's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Z77-d3h
      • CPU:
      • Intel 2500k @4.4ghz
      • Memory:
      • 2X4gb Corsair Vengeance
      • Storage:
      • WD 2tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • R290
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 750
      • Case:
      • Haf-x tower
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell u2410
      • Internet:
      • broadband with Plusnet
    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    This conservative party political broadcast brought to you by...
    commie....................:-)

  14. #30
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,025
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    3,383 times in 2,720 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish
    *chuckles*

  15. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,935
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked
    384 times in 311 posts
    • badass's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-m pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 2TB WD Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon RX 580
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG02-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Del U2311, LG226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • 80/20 FTTC
    Anyone else here think it would be fairer to scrap council tax completely and bump up the fairest tax of them all, income tax to make up for the shortfall?
    Porbably save a fortune in costs of collection aswell......
    "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."

  16. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    524
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    40 times in 34 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    Anyone else here think it would be fairer to scrap council tax completely and bump up the fairest tax of them all, income tax to make up for the shortfall?
    Porbably save a fortune in costs of collection aswell......
    Isn't that what the lib dems proposed, and everyone laughed at them?

    I have to say I agree though.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •