View Poll Results: Should they?

Voters
176. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    11 6.25%
  • No

    162 92.05%
  • Undecided

    3 1.70%
Page 1 of 5 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 74

Thread: So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

  1. #1
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,279
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    840 times in 475 posts

    So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

    Here's a brief breakdown for those not up to speed:

    Shortly after BBC's iPlayer launch, some UK ISPs noticed monthly streaming costs jump 20% - and for some that was 5% of their total running costs for the month.

    ISPs are now suggesting that the BBC should help foot the bill.

    The BBC says that's ridiculous, and that if the ISP networks aren't up to it then they should improve their networks, advertise their products better, and charge appropriate prices for appropriate services.

    The ISPs didn't like that much, saying that the BBC has no business telling ISPs how to go about their... business.

    So what do you think? Vote above!

    --------------------------

    And separate from the question itself, here are my thoughts:

    Firstly, ISPs are sh... rubbish. All of them. Well, most of them. You pay for something, and you only get some of it. In some cases, you pay for super-fast broadband, but if you use it for anything that actually benefits from super-fast broadband, you hit your usage cap in next to no time.

    Essentially, ISPs are putting off actually providing us with a decent amount of bandwidth for as long as they possibly can.

    The BBC iPlayer is creating more demand for that change, so ISPs need to invest. The BBC is funded by our license, and as the corporation moves towards more online-distributed content, shouldn't it use some of that funding to improve the distribution network?

    But if that's the case, there are two problems. First of all, we have iPlayer traffic getting preference over 4OD traffic, YouTube traffic and so on, because the BBC helped pay for the networks delivering the content... but of course we are the ones that helped pay for the network, really, so enough of that tiered Internet traffic bull.

    So what of the other video distribution services? Should Google pay to help ISPs deal with YouTube traffic? Should Channel 4 - which is ad-funded - help too?

    Without having to unravel a tapestry of awkward questions, it should be pretty clear already that such a system simply won't work.

    You pay whoever provides your pipe. Once your data's on the pipe you've paid for, it's on the Internet - and with the Internet, the idea is you're pretty much guaranteed the data will get where you want it to - you don't have to worry about it after that. If you start having to pay for somebody else's pipe so that they can receive your data... well the Internetwork becomes an Internotwork.

    Now for the hard hitting bit... ISPs, listen up:

    If your users want iPlayer and your network isn't up to it, upgrade your network infrastructure. To compensate for the expense, either save on outgoings somewhere else, pass on the costs to the customer, or a combination of the two.

    If your network is up to it, but your bandwidth costs are going up, well you still have to deal with the expense in much the same way.

    Some people will leave because they don't like the higher charges. But they'll come back once they realise that everybody's got to do it. And for those that don't do it... well you'll lose all the customers that actually want to make use of a true broadband connection.

    Oh look, I managed to solve the whole problem without creating a non-neutral net. I rock.
    Last edited by Steve; 09-04-2008 at 09:32 PM.
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  2. #2
    Senior Member manwithnoname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,050
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked
    26 times in 25 posts

    Re: So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

    I'd like to see ISP's try and bill Microsoft each time they release a service pack or IE upgrade.

    ISP's should fork out for equipment they need to provide a service, if they need to bill the customer more so be it.

  3. #3
    WEEEEEEEEEEEEE! MadduckUK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lytham St. Annes
    Posts
    17,297
    Thanks
    653
    Thanked
    1,580 times in 1,006 posts
    • MadduckUK's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5 3600
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200 DDR4
      • Storage:
      • 1x480GB SSD, 1x 2TB Hybrid, 1x 3TB Rust Spinner
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon 5700XT
      • PSU:
      • Corsair TX750w
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Enthoo Evolv mATX
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung SJ55W, DELL S2409W
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet 80

    Re: So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

    no.. no they shouldnt, would start a bad precedence

    if isp's need to charge more then so be it, thats fine.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ephesians
    Do not be drunk with wine, which will ruin you, but be filled with the Spirit
    Vodka

  4. Received thanks from:

    Bull Dog (10-04-2008)

  5. #4
    HEXUS.social member Agent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Internet
    Posts
    19,172
    Thanks
    736
    Thanked
    1,608 times in 1,046 posts

    Re: So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

    Its the typical UK ISP mentality: Give the broadband as cheap as you can, tie in a few small print conditions like 'fair use' and throttling, then moan when things don't go your way.

    I don't think most people have an issue with paying a few quid more for a better service. I've lost count the number of times I've almost gone to Zen for this reason, but their download limits are too low for me.
    Quote Originally Posted by Saracen View Post
    And by trying to force me to like small pants, they've alienated me.

  6. #5
    WEEEEEEEEEEEEE! MadduckUK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lytham St. Annes
    Posts
    17,297
    Thanks
    653
    Thanked
    1,580 times in 1,006 posts
    • MadduckUK's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5 3600
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200 DDR4
      • Storage:
      • 1x480GB SSD, 1x 2TB Hybrid, 1x 3TB Rust Spinner
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon 5700XT
      • PSU:
      • Corsair TX750w
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Enthoo Evolv mATX
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung SJ55W, DELL S2409W
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet 80

    Re: So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

    Quote Originally Posted by manwithnoname View Post
    I'd like to see ISP's try and bill Microsoft each time they release a service pack or IE upgrade.

    ISP's should fork out for equipment they need to provide a service, if they need to bill the customer more so be it.
    yep
    Quote Originally Posted by Ephesians
    Do not be drunk with wine, which will ruin you, but be filled with the Spirit
    Vodka

  7. #6
    Senior Member manwithnoname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,050
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked
    26 times in 25 posts

    Re: So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

    Just had a better idea - if the iplayer causes such as issue for an ISP all they need to do is block it - everyone wins the: ISP crappy infrastructure is not hammered so other customers can use the internet, if the customer wants to use iplayer then they can change ISP.

    tbh I think a lot of the whining is from Simon Gunter of Tiscali, might be something to do with iplayer free and Tiscali TV costing money

  8. #7
    The Irish Drunk! neonplanet40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Stirling
    Posts
    5,209
    Thanks
    963
    Thanked
    258 times in 177 posts
    • neonplanet40's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 Wi-Fi
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 7 2700X
      • Memory:
      • Patriot 16 GB DDR4 3200 MHz
      • Storage:
      • 256 Crucial MX100 +Kingston 256GB SSD and 500GB Samsung F3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Palit nVidia 1070Ti Rockgamer
      • PSU:
      • OCZ 650W
      • Case:
      • Akasa Eclipse-32
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 27" U2715H & Dell 23" U2311H
      • Internet:
      • 60MB

    Re: So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

    Definetly not.

    Should we get Mc Donalds to cover medical bills because some people are obese?

    Should we get tobbacco companys to cover cancer care costs?

    This is not how it works tbh.

    There should be no reason why broadband is so expensive in this country when it goes for peanuts in the likes of sweden and korea.

    BT etc are just money mad and need to sort it out. Sick of paying through the nose for everything these days and getting pretty much shafted with inferior products and packages than other parts of the world for a higher premium than they ever have had to pay.

    Enough with the stupid wars and silly spending. Lets sort this country out!
    Home Entertainment =Epson TW9400, Denon AVRX6300H, Panasonic DPUB450EBK 4K Ultra HD Blu-Ray and Monitor Audio Silver RX 7.0, Monitor Audio CT265IDC(x4) Dolby Atmos and XTZ 12.17 Sub - (Config 7.1.4)
    My System=Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 Wi-Fi, AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, Patriot 16 GB DDR4 3200MHz, 256GB Crucial SSD, Kingston 256GB SSD and 500GB Samsung F3, Palit GTX1070 GameRock Edition , Enermax Liberty 620W, Akasa Eclipse-32,Dell 2715H & Dell U2311H
    Home Server 2/HTPC - Ryzen 5 3600, Asus Strix B450, 16GB Ram, EVGA GT1030 SC, 2x 2TB Cruscial SSD, Corsair TX550, Plex Server & Nvidia Shield Pro 4K
    Diskstation/HTPC - Synology DS1821+ 16GB Ram - 10Gbe NIC with 45TB & Synology DS1821+ 8GB Ram - 10Gbe NIC with 14TB
    Portable=Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Huawei M5 10" & HP Omen 15 laptop

  9. #8
    TiG
    TiG is offline
    Walk a mile in other peoples shoes...
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Questioning it all
    Posts
    6,213
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked
    48 times in 43 posts

    Re: So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

    I'm assuming BBC has a huge ISP bill too, i mean you can't just get that bandwidth for free right?, surely the BBC's hosting costs are large in the first place. I mean I'm fairly sure hexus pays very large amounts of money for keeping the bandwidth available for hexus.tv.

    So content providers do pay for this already, maybe special case with BBC that they are large enough that can somehow do a deal like with some of their server architecture that they get it at a reduced rate.

    But If i download Iplayer stuff which I do, I think its fab and believe the quality and speed is absolutely fab. I'm on Virgin media and have had 0 issues with slow downloads. But i don't expect to pay extra to get it, i pay for the connection, not what i download over it. I just want a pipe to download what i like.

    Also i would argue that the situation with ISP'S getting fed up with legal content flies in the face of their categoric refusal to police P2P software, such as talktalk.
    They don't seem to complain about 80% of their network being taken up by illegal content and spam e-mails but have borked at 3-5% taken up by iplayer? OH MY!.

    TiG
    -- Hexus Meets Rock! --

  10. #9
    Pseudo-Mad Scientist Whiternoise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    4,274
    Thanks
    166
    Thanked
    386 times in 233 posts
    • Whiternoise's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI LANPARTY JR P45-T2RS
      • CPU:
      • Q6600
      • Memory:
      • 8GB DDR2
      • Storage:
      • 5.6TB Total
      • Graphics card(s):
      • HD4780
      • PSU:
      • 425W Modu82+ Enermax
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08b
      • Operating System:
      • Win7 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 23" IPS
      • Internet:
      • 1Gbps Fibre Line

    Re: So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

    Surely increased demand means the general user base is going to pay more for the "premium" broadband packages?

    So in a way they are covering the ISP's costs anyway.. at least that's how i see it.

    Obviously as has been mentioned, the BBC is right on by saying that they should improve their networks. I mean, i personally think it's outrageous that a single kilometre makes the difference between 8mb and 2mb, i mean that data is travelling at the speed of light (roughly) down those cables, so the distance shouldn't mean jack. Either sort out the noise issues or cough up for fibre optics.

  11. #10
    Guy
    Guy is offline
    HEXUS.social member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Hampshire, UK
    Posts
    5,166
    Thanks
    394
    Thanked
    407 times in 292 posts

    Re: So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

    'The BBC says that's ridiculous, and that if the ISP networks aren't up to it then they should improve their networks, advertise their products better, and charge appropriate prices for appropriate services.'

    ^^This seriously ISP's should actually get there act together and reinvest in there own infrastructure.

  12. #11
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,279
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    840 times in 475 posts

    Re: So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

    Quote Originally Posted by Whiternoise View Post
    Obviously as has been mentioned, the BBC is right on by saying that they should improve their networks. I mean, i personally think it's outrageous that a single kilometre makes the difference between 8mb and 2mb, i mean that data is travelling at the speed of light (roughly) down those cables, so the distance shouldn't mean jack. Either sort out the noise issues or cough up for fibre optics.
    Given that I know a bit* about communications engineering, I can say it's not easy getting high speeds out of ancient twisted pair. And even if you're in a place where you can get cable, or good ADSL, that's not the real battle... the real battle is the rest of the ISPs network and its upstream ISPs.

    *but I should say the best modem I can build would probably top out at 1Kbps unless you let me get some off the shelf mod/demod chips
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  13. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    258
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    23 times in 21 posts
    • Magnets's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte P35 DS3p
      • CPU:
      • E6420
      • Memory:
      • Corsair XMS2 5400 C4 (2gb)
      • Storage:
      • Seagate 7200.10 320gb *2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire x1950xt
      • PSU:
      • Corsair hx520
      • Case:
      • Lian li PC-7 + II
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic VP930
      • Internet:
      • Zen

    Re: So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

    It's absolutely absurd for the ISPs to even suggest that (which ISPs was it?)

    Quote Originally Posted by neonplanet40 View Post
    BT etc are just money mad and need to sort it out. Sick of paying through the nose for everything these days and getting pretty much shafted with inferior products and packages than other parts of the world for a higher premium than they ever have had to pay.

    Enough with the stupid wars and silly spending. Lets sort this country out!
    Yeh, AFAIK the cost/performance of our net connections all boil down to BTs network/BTs charges to the ISP, and unless you are lucky enough to be in a cable area, then a BT phone line is the only reasonable choice. Lots of people complain about VM though.

    BT are absolutely raking it in and they will continue to do so, because they have no competition. Maybe WiMAX will provide some competition, but i read somewhere that a trial of it in Australia didn't go very well.

  14. #13
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Canary Wharf
    Posts
    31
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • reldavidson's system
      • CPU:
      • 3.4ghz P4 (Work comp)
      • Memory:
      • 6gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Quadro nvs440
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x nec
      • Internet:
      • super quick

    Re: So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

    of course they shouldn't. I pay for my licence fee and i dont want any of it to go to the isp companies - it would be like paying for the ISP service twice.

    perhaps these so called companies should innovate a bit more and actually invest the revenue that the receive from their customers - kaizen springs to mind. not sure which isp were protesting but it amazes me that some retail companies come up with these stupid comments/demands.

  15. #14
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,279
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    840 times in 475 posts

    Re: So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

    Quote Originally Posted by Magnets View Post
    Maybe WiMAX will provide some competition, but i read somewhere that a trial of it in Australia didn't go very well.
    Yeah, I read the same thing - complaints about poor throughput and massive (1 second) latency, which is a pain when VoIP is one of its pushed uses. Latency isn't such an issue for on-demand video, but I'm still not sure current gen WiMAX would be up to it.
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  16. #15
    I R Toff Pandi! TAKTAK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Vergon6
    Posts
    7,450
    Thanks
    553
    Thanked
    1,013 times in 748 posts
    • TAKTAK's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 7 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 970 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
      • PSU:
      • Be Quiet SFX-L 600W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-O11 Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG Ultrawide
      • Internet:
      • 200Mb FTTP

    Re: So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

    oh, and the numpty that pressed yes was me
    i pressed the wrong one... too.. many... choices....
    Post Counts and Other Rewards, Rules, Folding@Home, Fans: Push vs Pull vs Push-Pull, Corsair PSU OEMs.

    Quote Originally Posted by razer121 View Post
    Would you like me to enter you? it would be my pleasure
    TAKTAK.co.uk

  17. #16
    Mostly Me Lucio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Tring
    Posts
    5,163
    Thanks
    443
    Thanked
    448 times in 351 posts
    • Lucio's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX-6350 with Cooler Master Seldon 240
      • Memory:
      • 2x4GB Corsair DDR3 Vengeance
      • Storage:
      • 128GB Toshiba, 2.5" SSD, 1TB WD Blue WD10EZEX, 500GB Seagate Baracuda 7200.11
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 270X 4GB
      • PSU:
      • 600W Silverstone Strider SST-ST60F
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF XB
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 64Bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 2032BW, 1680 x 1050
      • Internet:
      • 16Mb Plusnet

    Re: So SHOULD the BBC help cover ISP costs for iPlayer?

    I'm surprised that the ISP's haven't simply gone, look enough is enough, you have x GB and have to pay when you use more. It wouldn't be *that* hard to impliment and would free them up to actually get on with improving the service.

    I'm not convinced that either the BBC <b>or</b> the ISP's should pay for iPlayer's increased bandwidths, personally I think it should come out of our pocket, providing that also means that improvements will be made to the overall service. After all, you pay for electricity, gas, phone and often water depending on how much you use, why should data be unlimited?

    Better yet, why not have a two tier package? You pay a fixed fee for basic 512K connectivity, plenty for basic surfing, when you want to download a file, or watch a movie on iPlayer/Youtube/your favourite porn site, you engage a better mode that costs a few pence an hour, when you're done, you turn it back off.

    (\___/) (\___/) (\___/) (\___/) (\___/) (\___/) (\___/)
    (='.'=) (='.'=) (='.'=) (='.'=) (='.'=) (='.'=) (='.'=)
    (")_(") (")_(") (")_(") (")_(") (")_(") (")_(") (")_(")


    This is bunny and friends. He is fed up waiting for everyone to help him out, and decided to help himself instead!

Page 1 of 5 1234 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 20-03-2006, 03:24 PM
  2. BBC culls Cult website
    By Steve in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-07-2005, 01:47 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •