Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 17 to 32 of 46

Thread: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

  1. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,935
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked
    384 times in 311 posts
    • badass's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-m pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 2TB WD Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon RX 580
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG02-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Del U2311, LG226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • 80/20 FTTC

    Re: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lee @ SCAN View Post
    if your going to be using bbc iplayer or any other similar on demand system then you'll need a license.
    Not true and I haven't bothered reading further, but Iplayer has a Q+A on that. They dont care if non license payers use Iplayer and you are not breaking the law by doing so.

    Secondly, you are breking the law if you are capable of recieving the signals.

    In practice, that means make sure you have no aerials plugged in at all and you're covered. They can't come in your house anyway so tell them where to go. They however have a habit of lying to get in your house or being very vague.
    The whole enforcement is clouded with bull****. Their people just look through your windows to see if you're watching the TV if you haven't got a license.
    "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."

  2. #18
    Senior Member usxhe190's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,688
    Thanks
    149
    Thanked
    82 times in 63 posts

    Re: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    Not true and I haven't bothered reading further, but Iplayer has a Q+A on that. They dont care if non license payers use Iplayer and you are not breaking the law by doing so.
    Agreed, I don't think iplayer is at a stage where it is broadcasting live at the moment. It is just playback, like youtube.

    Therefore, there is no need for a licence.

  3. #19
    Editable... jimbouk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    3,071
    Thanks
    321
    Thanked
    278 times in 226 posts
    • jimbouk's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5 3600
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4 3200 MHz C16
      • Storage:
      • Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB NVMe PCIe M.2 2280
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Pulse RX 580 8GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Core Gold GC-650
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC-V1100 ATX
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC CU34G2/BK 34" Widescreen
      • Internet:
      • EE FTC

    Re: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

    How about a vga cable for your XBox 360, a dvd player with hdmi out and a hdmi - > DVi cable. Sell the TV and get a monitor without a tuner. Seems a lot more effort than sending a letter every so often though.

    People are right about the vauge wordings and general strangeness of TV licensing laws and enforcement practices. I remember a story about a guy who got fined when all he had the TV for was so his son could play snes, wasn't hooked up to the an aerial or anything.

  4. #20
    Admin (Ret'd)
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,481
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    3,208 times in 2,281 posts

    Re: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

    Quote Originally Posted by usxhe190 View Post
    You don't need a license if you are not watching BROADCAST TV. It doesn't matter if what was the original intention. If you stop using your TV to receive TV broadcast, you don't have to pay anymore.

    I.e. if you are using your tv just for DVDs and Xbox, you do NOT have to pay license.

    HOWEVER, the BBC and TVL will keep harassing you with threathing letters (because they think no one in the right mind would have a TV just for DVD and not watching broadcast TV).

    Just remember that they do not have police powers (i.e. cannot caution you), and you don't need to open the door to them - they are just salesmen.

    You don't have to tell them you aren't using your TV to watch broadcasts. Even if you tell them you don't watch broadcast TV, they think you have to give them the right to access your home to check. That is a lie, you don't have to.
    With one fine distinction, I agree entirely with that.

    The distinction is this. It isn't whether your watching broadcast TV that matters (as per your first sentence), it's the receiving.

    So if the TV is tuned and connected to an antenna, or even just tuned, then if it's turned on it's receiving and arguably you'd need a licence, whether you actually watch it or not. It certainly doesn't matter whether the signal is watchable or not.

    But, that nit-picking point apart, I completely agree with you.

  5. #21
    Senior Member usxhe190's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,688
    Thanks
    149
    Thanked
    82 times in 63 posts

    Re: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

    Quote Originally Posted by Saracen View Post
    With one fine distinction, I agree entirely with that.

    The distinction is this. It isn't whether your watching broadcast TV that matters (as per your first sentence), it's the receiving.

    So if the TV is tuned and connected to an antenna, or even just tuned, then if it's turned on it's receiving and arguably you'd need a licence, whether you actually watch it or not. It certainly doesn't matter whether the signal is watchable or not.

    But, that nit-picking point apart, I completely agree with you.
    Yep, it is receiving broadcasts. As long as the TV is not connected to the antenna, the OP is fine. Ignore all letters and calls and other threats from TVL and BBC.

  6. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,456
    Thanks
    100
    Thanked
    75 times in 51 posts
    • Mblaster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS PK5 Premium
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 2500K
      • Memory:
      • 8gb DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Intel X25 SSD + WD 2TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia GeForce GTX 570
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520
      • Case:
      • Antec P180
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • HP w2207 (22" wide)
      • Internet:
      • Rubbish ADSL

    Re: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    That's not how I understood the license act - it seems to say that usage isn't all that important, it's the fact you have a TV that's installed to recieve television services that causes you to need a license.

    So even if you just use it for DVDs/Xbox, if you are capable of recieving channels on the TV then you have to have a license.
    Yes, but by unplugging the aerial and de-tuning the TV you no longer have a 'TV that's installed to recieve television services', so you don't need to pay the licence fee, and can play DVDs/console games perfectly fine.

  7. #23
    Admin (Ret'd)
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,481
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    3,208 times in 2,281 posts

    Re: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

    Quote Originally Posted by usxhe190 View Post
    Yep, it is receiving broadcasts. As long as the TV is not connected to the antenna, the OP is fine. Ignore all letters and calls and other threats from TVL and BBC.
    Kinda depends on signal strength. Even without an antenna, a tuned set can still be receiving. If sufficient signal comes in, even without an antenna, and the set is tuned, the local oscillator injects the right frequency into the mixer and the reception occurs. If it's detuned, it doesn't.

  8. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    W.Mids
    Posts
    433
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    27 times in 24 posts
    • rover214's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67M
      • CPU:
      • I5 2400
      • Memory:
      • 8gb Mushkin Copperhead
      • Storage:
      • 120gb Intel 330 ssd, 1tb Samsung F3, 500gb WD Caviar Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA gtx 660 sc 2gb
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster Silent Pro Gold 600w
      • Case:
      • Fractal Arc Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Philips 22" full HD led
      • Internet:
      • VM 60mb

    Re: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

    what about if you are receiving from a "paid by subscription" source like sky or virgin

    obviously they do not have to pay an individual TV license to broadcast BBC, or do they have to contribute to the licensing as we all do? and then pass on the cost to us (like paying twice)

  9. #25
    Studmuffin Flibb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    4,904
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked
    324 times in 277 posts
    • Flibb's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX-6300
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3 PC3-12800
      • Storage:
      • Samsung SSD 840 EVO 250G
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 3GB MSI Radeon HD 7950 Twin Frozr
      • PSU:
      • FSP
      • Operating System:
      • Win7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Deffl TFT thing

    Re: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

    A close friend never watches broadcast TV, all they did was block of the aerial socket in the wall and inform the TV licensing people. Think they had a single visit, showed the bloke the capped socket and off he goes, never any hassle.

  10. #26
    Admin (Ret'd)
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,481
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    3,208 times in 2,281 posts

    Re: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

    Quote Originally Posted by rover214 View Post
    what about if you are receiving from a "paid by subscription" source like sky or virgin

    obviously they do not have to pay an individual TV license to broadcast BBC, or do they have to contribute to the licensing as we all do? and then pass on the cost to us (like paying twice)
    Sky and VM count as broadcast TV and you need a licence.

  11. #27
    WEEEEEEEEEEEEE! MadduckUK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lytham St. Annes
    Posts
    17,297
    Thanks
    653
    Thanked
    1,580 times in 1,006 posts
    • MadduckUK's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5 3600
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200 DDR4
      • Storage:
      • 1x480GB SSD, 1x 2TB Hybrid, 1x 3TB Rust Spinner
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon 5700XT
      • PSU:
      • Corsair TX750w
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Enthoo Evolv mATX
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung SJ55W, DELL S2409W
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet 80

    Re: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

    Quote Originally Posted by Flibb View Post
    A close friend never watches broadcast TV, all they did was block of the aerial socket in the wall and inform the TV licensing people. Think they had a single visit, showed the bloke the capped socket and off he goes, never any hassle.

    portable aerial ftw?
    Quote Originally Posted by Ephesians
    Do not be drunk with wine, which will ruin you, but be filled with the Spirit
    Vodka

  12. #28
    Pseudo-Mad Scientist Whiternoise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    4,274
    Thanks
    166
    Thanked
    386 times in 233 posts
    • Whiternoise's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI LANPARTY JR P45-T2RS
      • CPU:
      • Q6600
      • Memory:
      • 8GB DDR2
      • Storage:
      • 5.6TB Total
      • Graphics card(s):
      • HD4780
      • PSU:
      • 425W Modu82+ Enermax
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08b
      • Operating System:
      • Win7 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 23" IPS
      • Internet:
      • 1Gbps Fibre Line

    Re: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

    Do you still not require a TV License if it's a battery operated device?

    I believe it's a common trick to get a laptop tuner and only watch broadcasts when the AC adaptor is unplugged

    FWIW

    You don't use your television set or other device to watch or record broadcast programmes

    If you do not use your television set, video recorder or DVD player to watch or record authorised broadcast programmes (that is, BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Channel 5, cable television or satellite television) you will not need a licence. This means that you would not need a licence if, for example, you only:

    * use the television set as a computer monitor
    * use the television set to play electronic games
    * watch pre-recorded videos or DVDs, whether or not these have been bought or recorded by someone else.

    However, the television set and must be incapable of receiving all authorised broadcast programmes. This could be done, for example, by making sure that neither the television set nor the DVD or video recorder are tuned into any channels and ensuring that they are not connected to an aerial.
    and

    You do not have to let the enquiry officer into your home. If you do allow an enquiry officer to come in, they will carry out a brief inspection of the main living areas. If they are satisfied there is no TV set, they can authorise a 'stop on contact' for four years. This means that no one will contact you about your TV Licence for four years.

    If the enquiry officer is satisfied that you do not have a television licence and that you should have one, a statement will be taken under caution. The enquiry officer should not suggest that if you buy a licence within a certain period, no action will be taken.

    If you do not let the enquiry officer in, they may apply to a magistrates' court (sheriff court in Scotland) for a search warrant. They can do this only if there is good reason to suspect an offence has been committed. Refusal to allow entry to an enquiry officer is not, in itself, enough to justify anyone applying for a search warrant.
    From the CAB

  13. #29
    Looser Konan555's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    2,749
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked
    47 times in 44 posts

    Re: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004
    “television receiver” means any “apparatus installed or used for the purpose of receiving (whether by means of wireless telegraphy or otherwise) any television programme service, whether or not it is installed or used for any other purpose.

    In this regulation, any reference to receiving a television programme service includes a reference to receiving by any means any programme included in that service, where that programme is received at the same time (or virtually the same time) as it is received by members of the public by virtue of its being broadcast or distributed as part of that service.
    Puts to bed the notion that one needs a licence just to own a TV. Bottom line is that if there's no antenna/skybox/cable connected, it's not installed for the purpose of watching live broadcast.

    Of course, should you watch News24 live online you would need a licence. BBCi player doesn't fall foul of this.

    I'm pretty sure you do need a licence for battery operated devices - even your mobile. The BBC put it in simple terms on their advice page.

    Quote Originally Posted by The BBC
    You need a TV licence to use any television receiving equipment such as a TV set, set-top box, video or DVD recorder, computer or mobile phone to watch or record TV programmes as they are being shown on TV

  14. #30
    Admin (Ret'd)
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,481
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    3,208 times in 2,281 posts

    Re: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

    Quote Originally Posted by Konan555 View Post
    .....

    I'm pretty sure you do need a licence for battery operated devices - even your mobile. The BBC put it in simple terms on their advice page.
    The general case is yes, you do.

    The exception is that students in full time education do not, if they use a battery (internal battery) powered device during term time and outside of term time, live with someone (like parents) that do have a TV licence.

  15. #31
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

    In out last house, we never even had a TV plugged in.
    One was supporting a rather immense pile of books, and the other was... Well, we had to look for it when they finally sent someone round.
    Yet, as regular as clockwork, we'd receive the bullying letters, threatening fines and all, in big bold text.
    Though I'd never really respected them, the absence of negative feeling towards them quickly faded with the first few letters. Now, I open them with a feeling of numb inevitability.
    Like real-life trolls.

  16. #32
    SiM
    SiM is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,787
    Thanks
    300
    Thanked
    633 times in 422 posts
    • SiM's system
      • Motherboard:
      • P5K Premium
      • CPU:
      • Q6600
      • Memory:
      • 8GB PC2-6400 OCZ ReaperX + Platinum
      • Storage:
      • 3 x 320gb HD322HJ single platter in Raid 0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • PNY GTX285
      • PSU:
      • Corsair TX650W
      • Case:
      • Antec 1200
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2407-HC

    Re: TV License - Is it harder to avoid paying?

    Lol. Been receiving all these threatening letters too. I find it quite funny. We get 9 of the same letter every time (about once or twice every couple of months) in our student hall/flat. None of us actually have a TV though

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Windows Vista retail doomed unless Microsoft cuts prices?
    By Bob Crabtree in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 132
    Last Post: 02-04-2007, 01:05 PM
  2. TV License
    By lost eden in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 31-01-2007, 01:07 PM
  3. Official Vista Retail License
    By kalniel in forum Software
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 15-01-2007, 05:29 PM
  4. Mechcommander 2
    By Lee H in forum Gaming
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 23-03-2006, 05:59 PM
  5. DVLA - license exchange/renewal
    By Taz in forum Automotive
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 28-02-2006, 09:39 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •