http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/m...er/8248977.stm
Whilst available all over the internet anyway, it does surprise me that they seriously consider it as a useful book discussing how to make bombs. It's regularly quoted as having unreliable if not downright dangerous information on how to produce various explosive compounds amongst some generally harmless "phreaking" and other olden day pranks. I think it's a little over the top and actually unfair on the two lads to bring it up in front of a Jury who in all likelihood will go for the "Bloody hell they've got an Al Quaida manual" option rather than "Heh, everyone's read the cookbook at least once".The jury was told Matthew Swift, 18, bought a book over the internet - The Anarchist's Cookbook - which had details of how to make home-made bombs.
On the other hand, it became pretty clear that these guys are the definition of "TERRORIST FAIL".
The story continues to say:
When it became apparent that they had a couple of Ray Mears' on their hands, with plenty of experience in the Outback and had plans to "live off the land" in Alaska:
Clearly a dangerous pair then, trained to the highest order in a secret base in the Highlands by a group of militant Scots:Mr Carus asked him if he ever went to Alaska or "got anywhere near" the US state.
Matthew Swift said 'no' and said the only equipment they had were walking boots.
But surely they had a fully equipped laboratory with dangerous chemicals, loose wiring and packages in stained brown paper?Mr Carus asked him about his chemistry knowledge and plans to make explosives.
Matthew Swift told the jury he achieved a double D in chemistry.
When Mr Carus asked what tools and materials the teenager had in his shed for making a firearm, Mr Swift said all he had was a lawn mower.
Quite.The trial continues.