So in case you've been ignoring the press, Dawkins & co are at it again, this time saying we need to do something about the veil of secrecy around the Church, and the best way to do that is to prove that even those at the very top, have to answer for their actions.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/com...cle7094757.ece
Now whilst I'm sure Dawkins knows he can't get the pope arrested, he can ensure a lot of often difficult questions will get asked, this is something which I'm am just gob smacked by the response of many Catholics.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/da...-media-frenzy/
So basically its OK to just not bother investigating allegations of complacency in an organisation that has complete exposure to vulnerable children? What the hell!
I would understand if they where specifying how the allegations are un-founded, but to just dismiss them with a religious zeal is incredibly short cited, and I hope won't let them blow over.
If you wittingly help someone get away with child molestation, child after child then you deserve to be punished. It doesn't matter if you where following guidelines laid down by a church or any organisation, you deserve to be tried and punished accordingly.
People such as Damian who authored that questionable blog piece I have to ask them, if they don't want someone to be questioned about such crimes despite evidence they should, it seams your implicitly admitting guilt. I would suggest that anyone who 'stays quiet' on the subject of an innocent child been abused for the sake of an organisation seriously questions that organisation. Because to me, that is clear cut that they are batting for the evil team!