Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Is hell exothermic or endothermic?

  1. #1
    Ex-MSFT Paul Adams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    %systemroot%
    Posts
    1,926
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked
    77 times in 59 posts
    • Paul Adams's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus VIII
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7-6700K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB
      • Storage:
      • 2x250GB SSD / 500GB SSD / 2TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GeForce GTX1080
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Philips 40" 4K
      • Internet:
      • 500Mbps fiber

    Talking Is hell exothermic or endothermic?

    A thermodynamics professor had written a take home exam for his graduate students. It had one question:

    "Is hell exothermic or endothermic? Support your answer with a proof."

    Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law or some variant. One student, however, wrote the following:

    First, we postulate that if souls exist, then they must have some mass. If they do, then a mole of souls can also have a mass. So, at what rate are souls moving into hell and at what rate are souls leaving? I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving.

    As for souls entering hell, lets look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all people and all souls go to hell.

    With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in hell to increase exponentially.

    Now, we look at the rate of change in volume in hell. Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in hell to stay the same, the ratio of the mass of souls and volume needs to stay constant.

    So, if hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter hell, then the temperature and pressure in hell will increase until all hell breaks loose.

    Of course, if hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in hell, than the temperature and pressure will drop until hell freezes over.

    It was not revealed what grade the student got.
    ~ I have CDO. It's like OCD except the letters are in alphabetical order, as they should be. ~
    PC: Win10 x64 | Asus Maximus VIII | Core i7-6700K | 16GB DDR3 | 2x250GB SSD | 500GB SSD | 2TB SATA-300 | GeForce GTX1080
    Camera: Canon 60D | Sigma 10-20/4.0-5.6 | Canon 100/2.8 | Tamron 18-270/3.5-6.3

  2. #2
    iMc
    iMc is offline
    Senior Member iMc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Northants
    Posts
    3,616
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    HEXUS|iMc

  3. #3
    Bonnet mounted gunsight megah0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked
    73 times in 49 posts
    Another version:

    "First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So, we need to know the rate that souls are moving into Hell and the rate they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all people and all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand as souls are added.

    This gives two possibilities:

    1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.

    2. Of course, if Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.

    So which is it? If we accept the postulate given to me by Ms. Therese Banyan during my Freshman year, 'That it will be a cold night in Hell before I sleep with you', and take into account the fact that I still have not succeeded in having sexual relations with her, then 2 cannot be true, and so Hell is exothermic."
    Recycling consultant

  4. #4
    Rob
    Rob is offline
    Schmuck Rob's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    1,065
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    I like his thinking.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    1,467
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Very smart

    I'd love to know what a normal answer to that question looked like

  6. #6
    Dark Souled Warrior Auran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Grey Waste, Hades
    Posts
    532
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    If my thermodynamics prof had given me this question I'd have written him a paper on "Why he should get a life and set some sensible bloody questions" (Fortunately he had a big thing about engines so we had loads of questions on that - still hated it tho )

    Anyway, I know that thermodynamics is ALL about making asumptions, but this takes the biscuit. For starters you have to decide on which version of hell to use, though going for "The infinate planes of hell" would make it interesting.

    Still. I'd be tempted to go for the simple answer - Souls are the fuel for the fires of hell, which give off heat, thus exothermic. Job done

    Doubt that would get many marks though.....
    If it ain't broke, fetch a bigger hammer

  7. #7
    Yes, for my sins I'm offically Zak33's *better* half... Sair33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Aylesbury
    Posts
    1,017
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    7 times in 7 posts
    Slightly off-thread, but that reminds me of the (marketing?) exam question "What is a risk?" to which someone simply answered "THIS is a risk."


    I've had a lot of sobering thoughts in my time.... It was them that started me drinking.

  8. #8
    Suck, Squish, Bang, Blow
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    871
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mgh0
    This gives two possibilities:

    1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.

    2. Of course, if Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.

    So which is it? If we accept the postulate given to me by Ms. Therese Banyan during my Freshman year, 'That it will be a cold night in Hell before I sleep with you', and take into account the fact that I still have not succeeded in having sexual relations with her, then 2 cannot be true, and so Hell is exothermic."
    Surely if you freexe something it loses energy and therefore it is giving it off, so it it exothermic. That means either way, hell is exothermic as they both give off energy.

  9. #9
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,283
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    841 times in 476 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by midzt
    Surely if you freexe something it loses energy and therefore it is giving it off, so it it exothermic. That means either way, hell is exothermic as they both give off energy.
    Well if whatever chemical process is occuring is creating bonds of more energy than those which are being broken, then energy is being put INTO the "thing" (wooo to scientific terminology) and thus things get colder, but it's endothermic.

    I wish it wasn't nearly two years since I did anything about chemical reactions!
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  10. #10
    Cute & Fluffy GreenPiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Cardiff
    Posts
    1,196
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    9 times in 8 posts
    Our thermodynamics lecturer used to tell that story. Apparently the guy got a first for his use of original thinking
    Knight 1: We are now no longer the Knights who say Ni.
    Knight 2: NI.
    Other Knights: Shh...
    Knight 1: We are now the Knights who say..."Ekki-Ekki-Ekki-Ekki-PTANG. Zoom-Boing. Z'nourrwringmm.

  11. #11
    Sublime HEXUS.net
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    The Void.. Floating
    Posts
    11,819
    Thanks
    213
    Thanked
    233 times in 160 posts
    • Stoo's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Mac Pro
      • CPU:
      • 2*Xeon 5450 @ 2.8GHz, 12MB Cache
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 1600MHz FBDIMM
      • Storage:
      • ~ 2.5TB + 4TB external array
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI Radeon HD 4870
      • Case:
      • Mac Pro
      • Operating System:
      • OS X 10.7
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Samsung 244T Black
      • Internet:
      • Zen Max Pro
    Well, the clue is in the name endo = into, exo = out of, thermic = heat (basically).

    Thus endothermic takes in energy from its surroundings (making it colder), and endothermic expells energy into its surroundings (making it warmer) - easy peasy

    (And it's been about 7 years since I did chemistry )
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

  12. #12
    Photographer; for hire!! shiato storm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    next door
    Posts
    6,977
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    6 times in 5 posts
    hehe...
    Powered by Marmite and Wet Dog
    Light Over Water Photography

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. What the HELL is a Radeon 9550?
    By Zak33 in forum Graphics Cards
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 22-05-2004, 12:57 PM
  2. Nachi.C Worm hell!
    By MurphmanL in forum Software
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-04-2004, 04:32 PM
  3. Where the hell are my ciggies!!!!!
    By spazman in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 13-02-2004, 10:47 AM
  4. What the hell Gainward!!!
    By Flash in forum Graphics Cards
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 03-02-2004, 02:22 PM
  5. How the hell do I do this in VB?
    By Steve in forum Software
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 22-12-2003, 12:15 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •