http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...24.html?sub=AR
I get so ticked off to see that in an good move to improve education with girls schools have turned the tables on the boys. It's not just America either, it's certainly England too and perhaps throughout the 'West'. When I look around and see boys who are only trained to be self-obsessed, immature, game playing 'lads'; who never really grow past this as the years move by it upsets me.
Reading is not always an easy skill for most boys to pick up for but it can be promoted by making use of the right and varied material. I didn't much like reading anything beyond the occasional non-fiction book on a few favourite subjects. Until that is, I had to choose a pre-19th century novel for an English class. Shakespeare never inspired me and Jane Austen wasn't on the cards, but I came across a novel by some chap called Robert Louis Stevenson. Treasure Island it was called, and all of a sudden reading became interesting. It didn't turn me into a big novel reader at all. I still kept with my non-fiction, games magazines and other things, but it made me less afraid in the future, or perhaps more interested in other novels in the future. I eventually picked up a few novels along the way. Some novels on the Norse and some mythology got me into a few novels of the same kind. Thinking about it, once in Primary school, aged about 7 or 8 the teacher read 'Erik the Viking' to the class. Classics story, and in fact I remember asking my mum to take me out to buy that book. So maybe that was my start.
Now I hear about 'gender issues', 'cultural relevance', and it ticks me off. A government study to fix the problem? No thanks. How about just some good books. Ask the older generation of men about it and see what they say. It'll be cheaper and far more productive.