I finally got round to installing the Aerocool VM-102 passive GPU cooler onto my overclocked Geforce 7900GT. The absence of noise compared to the mini-bansaw sounding reference cooler is absolutel bliss.
Original setup:-
- Antec P180
- 2 x Antec tricool fans on lowest settings, which in turn are then connected to a fan controller set at 50%
- Inno3D Nvidia Geforce 7900GT (overclocked from 450/1320 to 570/1600)
- Scythe Ninja
- Athon64 3200+ (Venice core) overclocked from 2.0ghz to 2.6ghz @ 1.4v
- Cool 'n Quiet disabled
- Asus A8N SLI Premium
- Crucial Ballistix (2x512mb)
- Arctic Silver 5
- Silverstone 30NF PSU (passive)
- CPU (35c idle, 45-47C load)
- GPU (38c idle, 49 load)
After Aerocool VM-102 installed
- CPU (40c idle, 48-50C load)
- GPU (52-58c idle, 65-71C load)
Only had time to run a couple of 3DMark05 loops but the temperatures of the GPU seem well within range and certainly alot lower than the last passive graphics card I had (Gigabyte Geforce 6800 - 70c idle, 90c load, with an additional 20C reduction in temps when using a Zalman fan bracket and Nexus 80mm fan at 12v)
I expected CPU temperatures to increase slightly because the copper heatsink of the Aercool is only about 1cm away from the fins of the Ninja, so presumably the P180 case fan will suck hot air from the GPU area onto the CPU heatisnk.
My standard setup is very sensitive to temperature changes (Tricools on low + additional 50% reduction using fan controller). For example if I have the central heating in the house on high, 50% fan controller, Tricools low, CPU and GPU temps can hit 65c and 85c respectively when under load such as 3D gaming. Having the central heating off and Tricools on low only (no fan controller), temps go back down to 45C and 65C on load. When gaming, I tend to put the fan controller on maximum so that the Tricools revert to running at standard stock speed (their standard "low" setting) without an further reduction.
I don't see any reason why it wouldn't be possible to use the P180 GPU fan bracket (though I don't see why it would be necessary).
Additional comments:-
- the Aerocool isn't difficult to fit, but its slightly fiddly (more so than the Zalman passive heatsink) because lining up the screws can involve some guesswork / trial and error.
- when fitting the heatsink onto the GPU block, you have to make sure that the heatisnk (alu/copper part) isn't positioned too far down along the heatpipes (ie not too close to motherboard). Otherwise it can intefere with the RAM. On my first attempt at fitting the copper/alu heatsink onto the GPU block, I fitted it far too low down and the fins ended up touching the tops of my DDR ram heatspreaders.
- the fins of the Aercool heatsink almost touch the frame of the P180 rear case fan (probably about 0.5mm away).
- The price of heastink is good (�22 here in the UK) and comparable to the Zalman VF-700 �18 or the VF900 �25. Alot cheaper than the Thermalright V-1.
- the GPU block is not "spring loaded", so you have to be careful not to screw it down too much so that it damages the core. Would have been nice if Aerocool could have provided some springs to reduce the risk.
Overall, I'm extremely pleased with the heatsink and the temperature results. The sound of silence is truly bliss!