I was offered: Geforce 6600GT, 128MB DDR3, 128 bit.
is it a good card?
is there a card a lot better and not more expensive?
thanks....
I was offered: Geforce 6600GT, 128MB DDR3, 128 bit.
is it a good card?
is there a card a lot better and not more expensive?
thanks....
7600gt?
Workstation 1: Intel i7 950 @ 3.8Ghz / X58 / 12GB DDR3-1600 / HD4870 512MB / Antec P180
Workstation 2: Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.6Ghz / X38 / 4GB DDR2-800 / 8400GS 512MB / Open Air
Workstation 3: Intel Xeon X3350 @ 3.2Ghz / P35 / 4GB DDR2-800 / HD4770 512MB / Shuttle SP35P2
HTPC: AMD Athlon X4 620 @ 2.6Ghz / 780G / 4GB DDR2-1000 / Antec Mini P180 White
Mobile Workstation: Intel C2D T8300 @ 2.4Ghz / GM965 / 3GB DDR2-667 / DELL Inspiron 1525 / 6+6+9 Cell Battery
Display (Monitor): DELL Ultrasharp 2709W + DELL Ultrasharp 2001FP
Display (Projector): Epson TW-3500 1080p
Speakers: Creative Megaworks THX550 5.1
Headphones: Etymotic hf2 / Ultimate Ears Triple.fi 10 Pro
Storage: 8x2TB Hitachi @ DELL PERC 6/i RAID6 / 13TB Non-RAID Across 12 HDDs
Consoles: PS3 Slim 120GB / Xbox 360 Arcade 20GB / PS2
yeh but probs for around the same price like arthur says u could probs get a 7600GT
PowerColor HD 4850 512MB
Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS3L iP35 Socket 775 8 channel audio ATX Motherboard
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 2.53GHz
Coolermaster Centurion 5 All Black
Corsair 450W VX 450W PSU
Samsung SpinPoint F1 500GB
In most places I've looked the 7600GT is a similar price to the 6600GT if i had a budget of around those sorts of prices then I'd get the 7600GT.
I had a 6600GT I paid around 140-50 quid 18 months or so ago and their great cards. After screwing it up the other day I bought a 6800GS-AGP 450Mhz/1.2Ghz Mem and its way better than my older card and its only around 90 quid. With everything set to highest quality in UT2004 and with 4xaa and 16AF i still manage an average of 75FPS at 1280x1024. Those sorts of settings on my old 6600GT produced an unplayable result.
what was the memory and bit on your 6600gt? did you like it? (although the 6800 was better...).Originally Posted by Dorza
Folks - note, he's looking for an AGP card, so 7600s are out.
6800GS (older games) or 1600pro (newer games) might be good bets.
I think the mem is set to 1000Mhz and the core 500Mhz though i could be wrong.Originally Posted by Flash7
This is the card I had. Yeah i liked it, it could play the prey demo no problem. I wasn't planning on changing it until next year some time but then I broke it as I said earlier and had to buy a new and cheaper card.
Last edited by Dorza; 17-07-2006 at 05:49 PM.
6800GS by a mile really.. no.. X1600Pro is a seriously crippled card.. its like a tricycle with a 50cc motor and flat tires..
Sorry, the X1600 series just never really got to me..
Me want Ultrabook
6800GS can be unlocked, if you are lucky and are willing to take a risk, it might be a good buy.
Indeed they can be however it needs to be the nv40 core; the nv41 core can't be unlocked. Around the net their saying the NV40 core is the AGP version and the NV41 is the PCI-E version hence you can't unlock the PCI-E version however this seems to be incorrect information (now at least) since the nv41 is also found in AGP versions.Originally Posted by JuanFlaiter
Just wanting to be helpful the reason the nv41 is probably in the agp version too now is because nvidia like to upgrade their cores to the ones that dont unlock so that you have to pay more they did this with the 6200 (non turbocache ones turbocache was just completely incompatible cos of not enough physical ram to masquerade as a higher one with ram) Ati do the same. Its basic faceless corporation procedure.
Edit: nearly forgot, by now you want to avoid it it delivers parralel performance to x700pro (i have one and my mate has on and we outperform each other in dffernt games) but if you like me have a tight budget then by no means completley forget it its perfectly sufficient for things like bf2 1024x768 mid-high no aa or af.
Yeah if you're comparing them head to head the 6800GS wins by miles, but they're very different categories - the 1600pro is budget. However, it also performs pretty well in modern games like Oblivion for the price.Originally Posted by sawyen
Not really. The reason is they stopped producing the old NV40 cores some time ago, but they still have stocks of NV41 which can be converted to AGP cheaply with their bridging chip which they have large stocks of as well. NVidia don't really care about unlocking because it doesn't threaten any card they market (you can't buy a 6800gt/ultra anymore) and the equivalent 7 series cards are better than even unlocked GSs. The NV41 core was cheaper to produce as well, and in any case I'd consider it better than the NV40 because the smaller nm process overclocks better as well (without the need for unlocking - lower pipes, but faster speed), while running cooler and using less power.Originally Posted by EllTheGamer
Well I was saying that yes they could have that - it doesn't bother NVidia at all
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)