Read more.The Sapphire-exclusive Radeon HD 4850 X2 has been slashed in price and is doing its best to turn the high-end market on its head.
Read more.The Sapphire-exclusive Radeon HD 4850 X2 has been slashed in price and is doing its best to turn the high-end market on its head.
I wouldn't be trendously sure they're making a loss - the chips themselves are cheap enough, it's just the packaging and R&D that's pricey. But then again didn't AMD commision the dual-chip design from Sapphiretech in the first place? So that was maybe already done and paid for.
Great price indeed. I expect these to be flying off the shelves.
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
not really, sticking two 4850's on one card increases the cost compared to two disrete cards. I can't remember how many layers a single and a x2 board uses but you can guarentee the x2 uses a thicker pcb with more layers a lot more traces in a small space and more shielding of the signals being required, it increases the cost, increases the time the pcb spends in the plant making them, increases the time taken for each card to be made etc, etc, etc.
But as you say I still wouldn't remotely think these are making a loss. While Nvidia are certainly making losses on all the excess 280's being sold off stupidly cheap, and probably lots of their cards since the 280/260's, I'd hazard a guess the 4850/4870's were making a decent profit from the get go and still are and have a decent margin for reduction in costs.
This is just what AMD had in reserve price wise the whole time while waiting for nvidia's 55nm and their own x2 part. They could have done this 5 months ago when the nvidia 55nm stuff was due but basically had no need to at all.
In all honesty, theres very very VERY little either X2 can't handle, you'd have to be monumentally stupid to pay £400-450 for a 295gtx considering you wouldn't tell the difference in anything but deadspace to a £330 4870x2, maybe even the £250 4850x2. You'd have to be even more stupid to buy a 285gtx, hell the 295gtx is virtually the bargain of the century compared to it. Double the performance or near enough, for 30% more.
I would love to replace my 4850 for a 4850 x2. It might be a little overkill for 1680*1050 but it should mean I wont have to upgrade for a little while yet.
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
Based on the size of the die and such like, nvidia's products are more expensive to make.
In order to get their 55nm xx5 parts out there, they will have to (and are) discount the older xx0 parts - in order to be competitive with ATI, margins would have already been thin and so further discounting to clear them out would LIKELY result in a loss.
what kind of sources were you after? copies of Nvidia's bank statements?
whether they're making a loss or not, the huge price cuts Nvidia had to make when the 48xx's were introduced would suggest to me that Nvidia are less happy about their profit margins than ATI/AMD. Having to make further cuts to get rid of back stock with the newer releases can't help.
But then what do I know, I haven't seen their bank statements...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)