That's a fair point, and I agree to some extent, but on the flipside you could argue that there's a public interest angle - when a retailer "goes bust" (for want of a better term), customers with unfulfilled orders are always a long way down the receiver's list of priorities, and once all the preferential creditors have been satisfied there's unlikely to be much if anything left in the kitty.
You're less likely to come a cropper if you're covered by Section 75 of the CCA, but this doesn't apply to all purchases in all circumstances, and I'm sure many people would appreciate the tip-off before parting with their cash.
That's not an argument for irresponsible reporting, and hopefully those concerned will be pretty sure of their facts... if not, their own reputation will be on the line, as well as risking possible legal repercussions.![]()


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote





