Read more.They sign up to another seven years of updates from the pioneering Canadian firm.
Read more.They sign up to another seven years of updates from the pioneering Canadian firm.
I think the arguments against the D-Wave and all Quantum systems of it's type is that once it's measured then it's no longer quantum. Quantum bits are both 1 and 0 until they are measured and then Quantum indeterminancy goes flying out the window.
My understanding of Quantum computing was that the cpu can essentially consume its resource on a task while still running a huge number of other resource-intensive tasks, with each task essentially being computed in a different universe.
On a lighter note, D:Wave were actually in the latest episode of Continuum - terrorists from the future steeling quantum computers!
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
Why is Steven Hawking doing the webinar?
That seems to be "just about it" and it's quite hard to quantify (heh) exactly what or how the resources are being consumed for the tasks. In a report of time-to-target metrics and being benchmarked against single core super processors of the current architectures it was found that certain ways that processes are done, Q-computing is no better whereas others it left things behind in the dust. Another article written shortly after (having trouble finding again) boiled it down to that the way a Q-computer works requires the processes and algorithms to be set up differently than their standard silicon ancestors. This led to the development and swathes of researching into a new line of Quantum Programmers. Because standard models for programming suck for Q-computing, lets make a new methodology with blackjack and Q Hookers.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)