Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345
Results 65 to 72 of 72

Thread: Microsoft says Windows 7 isn't fit for modern hardware and security

  1. #65
    The late but legendary peterb - Onward and Upward peterb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Looking down & checking on swearing
    Posts
    19,378
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked
    3,403 times in 2,693 posts

    Re: Microsoft says Windows 7 isn't fit for modern hardware and security

    ^Thank you - I am quite surprised!
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

    Been helped or just 'Like' a post? Use the Thanks button!
    My broadband speed - 750 Meganibbles/minute

  2. #66
    Admin (Ret'd)
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,481
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    3,208 times in 2,281 posts

    Re: Microsoft says Windows 7 isn't fit for modern hardware and security

    Quote Originally Posted by directhex View Post
    You'd be surprised. There's an insane amount of per-app checking, to keep old apps running.

    XP had this popup for known-incompatible apps:



    And they kept working at it, to get a lot of XP-incompatible win95/98 apps running on Vista+!: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/...-february-2010
    And that's admirable.

    But not much help when MS decide to force an update on a user, and the result is the user finds something he needs and that worked fine last night no longer works first thing this morning. Which is why the sensible, with machines they can't afford to be without, test all upgrades and updates thoroughly on a non-essential sacrificial machine before rolling it out - a procedure denied them by mandatory auto-updates, and why I have frozen my Windows machines at Win7 for essential applications, and migrated everything else to Linux.

  3. #67
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    12,986
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,588 times in 1,343 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Microsoft says Windows 7 isn't fit for modern hardware and security

    Quote Originally Posted by directhex View Post
    Who's doing the regression testing on that? What if app B was actually depending on buggy, undefined behaviour in libfoo 1.1? Which library authors are actually making dependable API/API contracts (the Java and JS worlds show us "none of them")
    It does happen, and indeed as a software engineer it has happened to me.

    Someone at some point in the past had written some buggy code in a package I was responsible for.
    I developed the code on a Fedora machine which I kept up to date on the stable package stream.
    A system library update caused the program to crash, because the library started detecting the rubbish call sequence.
    I fixed the code, pushed the change. It went through the normal release and QA test cycle.

    Now, the actual users were on RedHat server which has a slower and very conservative update cycle. They weren't going to see the problem for probably a year and a half, I don't know because I didn't hear a single bug report for that issue from the field. If people are updating their system, they will tend to update the application software as well. So the end result of the libraries changing for me was that a bug that needed fixing got fixed, customers will only have seen stability improvements overall.

    Now there are people out there running old and no longer maintained software. If you do that, then you might occasionally snapshot and update the system but chances are you just don't update, ever. That's the bit that Saracen wants the option for. I also have had Linux partitions like that for old development environments.

    If as a developer you know you are likely to deploy into tricky environments, then you static link rather than dynamic and just ship a bigger binary with almost no dynamic dependencies. Again, that needs to be allowed as a choice, though I always feel a bit dirty if using that one.

  4. #68
    Editable... jimbouk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    3,071
    Thanks
    321
    Thanked
    278 times in 226 posts
    • jimbouk's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5 3600
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4 3200 MHz C16
      • Storage:
      • Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB NVMe PCIe M.2 2280
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Pulse RX 580 8GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Core Gold GC-650
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC-V1100 ATX
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC CU34G2/BK 34" Widescreen
      • Internet:
      • EE FTC

    Re: Microsoft says Windows 7 isn't fit for modern hardware and security

    Having uninstalled the new calculator app in Windows 10 I've just found out the old one doesn't exist anymore. I was hoping it would just(!) be a case of tweaking the registry (like restoring Windows Photo Viewer) but it seems not.

    A quick google ended my up on Wikipedia, followed by the Windows 10 editions page. Now I'm left wondering how as a home user I get hold of Enterprise LTSB without all the added gumpf...

    Windows 10 isn't fit for modern computer users...

  5. #69
    Seething Cauldron of Hatred TheAnimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    17,168
    Thanks
    803
    Thanked
    2,152 times in 1,408 posts

    Re: Microsoft says Windows 7 isn't fit for modern hardware and security

    Quote Originally Posted by peterb View Post
    ^Thank you - I am quite surprised!
    Check out this story:

    https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2000/...-egg-problems/

    If you don't want the long read, try just searching for SimCity. Frankly it's shocking.
    throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)

  6. Received thanks from:

    peterb (23-01-2017),Saracen (23-01-2017),satrow (07-02-2017),Xlucine (23-01-2017)

  7. #70
    The late but legendary peterb - Onward and Upward peterb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Looking down & checking on swearing
    Posts
    19,378
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked
    3,403 times in 2,693 posts

    Re: Microsoft says Windows 7 isn't fit for modern hardware and security

    Quote Originally Posted by TheAnimus View Post
    Check out this story:

    https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2000/...-egg-problems/

    If you don't want the long read, try just searching for SimCity. Frankly it's shocking.
    Excellent read - and written over 16 years ago! (And still relevant)
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

    Been helped or just 'Like' a post? Use the Thanks button!
    My broadband speed - 750 Meganibbles/minute

  8. #71
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    208
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    7 times in 5 posts

    Re: Microsoft says Windows 7 isn't fit for modern hardware and security

    Until they get the message with the telemetry crap. Spybot anti-beacon = job done

    It "sadly" breaks the use of bing as a search tool (OH NO! Screamed all the 1 users, together). Otherwise wonderful.

  9. #72
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    555
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    28 times in 22 posts
    • Rubarb's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI H81m-E33
      • CPU:
      • G3258
      • Memory:
      • 8GB hyper x beast
      • Storage:
      • 120ssd, 2gb hdd
      • Graphics card(s):
      • msi gtx960 4gb
      • PSU:
      • seasonic 450w
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake mozrt tx
      • Operating System:
      • windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • samsung 24'
      • Internet:
      • 100mb

    Re: Microsoft says Windows 7 isn't fit for modern hardware and security

    Love the way they say windwos 7 isn't fit for modern computing yet neglect to add that windows 8/ 8.1 is even worse.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •