Read more.Ryzen CPU optimised power plan is a great alternative to the 'High Performance' plan.
Read more.Ryzen CPU optimised power plan is a great alternative to the 'High Performance' plan.
So a fix is being touted as a new feature?
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
What bug are you claiming is being fixed?
This story includes an optimised power plan which is less aggressive about power saving than the default Windows balanced plan, and a patch for a game that includes optimisations for Ryzen processors. Neither the plan nor the patch is fixing anything, as nothing is actually broken. Both the power plan and the game were working as designed.
Or optimisations delivering optimised performance for free.
Looking at the Warhammer numbers the performance has jumped 11%. That's three generations worth of Intel CPU upgrades. Add the performance from the power plan and that could be 5 generations worth. Intel want £500-£700 for that kind of improvement and it takes 5-7 years to deliver. AMD have done it in 2 months for free.
Yeah, we should all take shaithis stance and slag AMD off for doing this.
Millennium (08-04-2017)
My comments were at the news article, not the FIX by AMD.....but hey, don't let that get in the way of finding a reason to attack me.
AMD fixed the power profile, hexus report it like they've added a new feature....and it is a fix, or are you going to imply some nefarious plot to put intel optimisations into the Windows power plans to scupper AMDs launch? It's not like AMD couldn't test the power plans prior to release was it?
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
Handbags down people...
The Win 10 stuff is known to favour Intel because let's face it they have a huge market advantage.
Better we applaud AMD for coming with a tweak (not a fix really) to improve their product so quickly. Because they do things slightly differently these things will happen moving forward to improve things for us the consumer, don't forget that
Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!
I would expect these tweaks to benefit Intel CPUs as well - they certainly mirror a tweak with the park states I remember applying.
It was never really "broken" to begin with, just optimized for older generations of hardware and almost vestigial today.
Remember that Intel has been supplying their own drivers for some time now that completely overrides Windows 10's timers and thresholds for P-state transitions, so only 3+ generations old systems still actually use them.
Capitalization is the difference between helping your Uncle Jack
off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse.
Last edited by Millennium; 10-04-2017 at 05:53 PM. Reason: accuracy
hexus trust : n(baby):n(lover):n(sky)|>P(Name)>>nopes
Be Careful on the Internet! I ran and tackled a drive by mining attack today. It's not designed to do anything than provide fake texts (say!)
At least the R5 series should look relatively better!
Yeah, reading around I take it back scaryjim. AMD have said the Win10 scheduler is fine for Ryzen. There may be some small improvements MS could make with regard to core parking behaviour on Ryzen vs Intel, but it's unlikely to make enough difference for anyone to really notice.
Thanks for the correction.
hexus trust : n(baby):n(lover):n(sky)|>P(Name)>>nopes
Be Careful on the Internet! I ran and tackled a drive by mining attack today. It's not designed to do anything than provide fake texts (say!)
scaryjim (10-04-2017)
AFAIK Intel actually provide a CPU driver that prevents core parking on their CPUs, rather than it being something Microsoft have implemented at an OS level. I suspect AMD will eventually release a similar driver through Windows Update; I'd guess that'll take a while to go through certification though, whereas making an alternative power plan available is something they can do directly so is a quicker optmisation...?
Millennium (10-04-2017)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)