Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 17 to 32 of 35

Thread: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

  1. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

    And yes you are right...
    But most people are simply not bothered - regardless of the implications. I was simply saying that for some reason, people seem disinterested in computer security again - but more interested in a notch in a flagship phone that hasn't been announced yet. In many ways geekiness is disappearing and I feel that is why this issue is not being made such an issue of! It's another flaw in a cpu...old news
    Don't shoot the messenger - but that's my opinion
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  2. Received thanks from:

    Millennium (29-05-2018)

  3. #18
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    12,986
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,588 times in 1,343 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

    Quote Originally Posted by 3dcandy View Post
    I was simply saying that for some reason, people seem disinterested in computer security again
    I think most people don't understand it. Yet another way that their laptop can get infested with malware isn't news to them, it's already infested on a regular basis. Otherwise we wouldn't trigger on phrases like:

    "Hey you know about computers, my laptops gone slow".

    Now a notch in a phone, anyone can have an opinion on that.

  4. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

    LOl that flagship phone that will probably be vulnerable to this exploit?
    It just shows how messed up 2018 is
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  5. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked
    304 times in 221 posts

    Re: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

    Quote Originally Posted by 3dcandy View Post
    And yes you are right...
    But most people are simply not bothered - regardless of the implications. I was simply saying that for some reason, people seem disinterested in computer security again - but more interested in a notch in a flagship phone that hasn't been announced yet. In many ways geekiness is disappearing and I feel that is why this issue is not being made such an issue of! It's another flaw in a cpu...old news
    Don't shoot the messenger - but that's my opinion
    I'll try not to shoot you too much, but messengers like yourself saying what you're saying (in your earlier comments) can lead people to go "oh, it's just a storm in a teacup then" when it's not, really.

    I agree that people are still not as interested in digital security as they should be, but still, it's up to Tech sites like this to make sure people are informed nonetheless.

    I don't want to dig at Mark too much, but the same amount of effort that was put into this (in my opinion) waste of digital space, except as a small corner of mouth tugger, could have been used to find much better things to talk about. I presume the writers for Hexus have many other roles because Hexus covers less than 40% of Tech news as I see it. Hell, OC3D Facebook does a far better job and that's just an enthusiast page.
    Last edited by Tabbykatze; 29-05-2018 at 02:39 PM.

  6. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

    But you see - there's the issue. To the vast majority it IS a storm in a tea cup.
    I'm not disagreeing with you - but when I deal with clients and customers these days things like this are so common they're not bothered. As dances said it's just another bit of malware to them. Getting people who are more bothered that Win 10 doesn't look nice than actually sorting anything else out
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  7. #22
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

    Cough,cough I have a bad cough:

    https://forums.hexus.net/pc-hardware...o-l-chips.html

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    ....don't seem too be as bad as they look.

    I was looking on NBC after seeing a review of a N4200 based laptop:
    http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-P....182736.0.html
    http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-A-S....144751.0.html

    Both have singled threaded CB R11.5 scores of between 0.6 and 0.66 and multi-threaded scores are around 2 it seems.

    I was wondering how a Q6600 compared to this:

    http://www.legitreviews.com/upgradin...7-4770k_2247/9



    Wait,wut??

    Single threaded scores are close to a 2.4GHZ Core2 Duo,and no doubt the lower memory bandwidth(or maybe the TDP limit) is not helping when all cores are under stress,but still that is still more than usable for a tablet or cheapo laptop especially since modern IGPs handle decode of media much better.

    The Atom is especially impressive as it is meant to be a low cost chip with a 6W TDP. The IGP even handles H265 decode too(!!).
    I made that thread back in 2016. The 2016 Atom CPUs even did H265 decode,and the N4200 had Q6600 level performance.

    You don't need Reddit,Hexus is ahead of the curve!!
    Last edited by CAT-THE-FIFTH; 29-05-2018 at 04:01 PM.

  8. Received thanks from:

    Millennium (29-05-2018),Xlucine (29-05-2018)

  9. #23
    don't stock motherhoods
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,298
    Thanks
    809
    Thanked
    125 times in 108 posts
    • Millennium's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI X470 Gaming Plus
      • CPU:
      • AMD 3600x @ 3.85 with Turbo
      • Memory:
      • 4*G-Skill Samsung B 3200 14T 1T
      • Storage:
      • WD850 and OEM961 1TB, 1.5TB SSD SATA, 4TB Storage, Ext.
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 3070 FE HHR NVidia (Mining Over)
      • PSU:
      • ToughPouwer 1kw (thinking of an upgrade to 600w)
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define S
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 101 Home 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • HiSense 55" TV 4k 8bit BT709 18:10
      • Internet:
      • Vodafone 12 / month, high contentions weekends 2, phone backup.

    Re: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

    Well, personally I do think this is newsworthy, though really not as newsworthy as Spectre 3 and 4 (which I'm kind of aware of but didn't know this designation) are right now.

    It's fairly overpriced really for what it is, IMHO the power differential is very interesting to me as a hardware enthusiast since the mid 90s. I'm still not buying Intel CPUs, perhaps ever, more likely until they grow some bonhomie. And fix their stuff responsibly...

    Roll on Zen 7nm. I am wishing for 5.4GHz and 16 threads again (r7 1700 @ 3.9 now). Perhaps 24-32 AMD64 threads. It's really let's just call it (cough) ''e-peen'' though, I don't game really, this sys is 'fine'. I don't mine anything any longer (as in block chain encryptions). I just browse, chat and play music and video mainly!
    hexus trust : n(baby):n(lover):n(sky)|>P(Name)>>nopes

    Be Careful on the Internet! I ran and tackled a drive by mining attack today. It's not designed to do anything than provide fake texts (say!)

  10. #24
    Senior Member Xlucine's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,160
    Thanks
    297
    Thanked
    188 times in 147 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus TUF B450M-plus
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB @ 3.2 Gt/s
      • Storage:
      • Crucial P5 1TB (boot), Crucial MX500 1TB, Crucial MX100 512GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 980ti
      • PSU:
      • Fractal Design ION+ 560P
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E
      • Operating System:
      • W10 pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic vx3211-2k-mhd, Dell P2414H

    Re: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

    Quote Originally Posted by 3dcandy View Post
    But you see - there's the issue. To the vast majority it IS a storm in a tea cup.
    I'm not disagreeing with you - but when I deal with clients and customers these days things like this are so common they're not bothered. As dances said it's just another bit of malware to them. Getting people who are more bothered that Win 10 doesn't look nice than actually sorting anything else out
    And if no-one makes a big deal of it, then the rare occasion that the general public does come across an article about it then they'll think "no-one else is talking about this, it's probably nothing". How are they ever going to get educated if we sweep everything under the rug?

  11. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

    Quote Originally Posted by Xlucine View Post
    And if no-one makes a big deal of it, then the rare occasion that the general public does come across an article about it then they'll think "no-one else is talking about this, it's probably nothing". How are they ever going to get educated if we sweep everything under the rug?
    Most of them have no desire to be educated about this kind of thing. Most people I know now don't have a pc at home it's a work thing. The devices they have at home are tablets and phones - a laptop at most which rarely gets used.
    Now that's probably against the majority of people on here - but that's the reality for many. I'm finding increasingly large amounts of people who have no broadband any more and rely on 4G
    The accent on security of systems is moving away from home users and back to business users and the IT department.

    Like the IT crowd used to say - have you turned it off and back on again?
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  12. #26
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

    Most people are clueless when it comes to tech,but it does not mean major security issues should be buried,otherwise if that is the case major companies won't bother that much either - companies will only do as much as they can get away with until a security breach happens.

  13. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

    That's my point..it's already being buried
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  14. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked
    304 times in 221 posts

    Re: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

    So just because some people don't care to be educated about this kind of thing, news sites just shouldn't write about it? What kind of logic is that?

    I don't want to keep seeing and be educated about the horrors of murder and rape on the news all the time because it makes me miserable and i no longer want to hear about it. News sotes should stop writing about it.

    It's about the duty of journalism to write about things, whether they are big or small. This article is small, Spectre and anything security related is big. Granted there are some minor things that should be left to one side because the, but still.

    You cannot take the attitude "people are numb to it so we should stop writing about it", that is what leads to letting the bad guys win.

    </soapbox>

  15. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

    I never said that.. I just said that in my current opinion the general public isn't that bothered. So with people in general being less bothered does that make it less newsworthy? Perhaps... bad news sells so the saying goes, but something has to be newsworthy to begin with for it to become news. And that is the issue here - some people may say it's newsworthy, others may not.
    This is why I'm saying that people seem less and less bothered. Less people comment on stuff on tinternet, less likes etc. And this attitude is filtering down to news. The people who have expressed an opinion on this thread here are more bothered than others, us geeks if you like. The fact you have to look quite hard to find any information is proof enough that this is not deemed that newsworthy is it not?

    I'm not arguing against you, far from it. Just explaining that the majority of people I have to work with on a daily basis don't give a stuff about this. As I said above somewhere - I'm more likely to get people expressing doubts about Win 10 looking bad than a major exploit that could actually lose them data and/or work and hit them hard. Or a notch on the latest phone. I am the admin of a website that has had to be modified slightly to work under IE6 because it is accessed (legitimately) from NHS computers that still run IE6. I had an email conversation with someone who didn't actually realise that IE6 was outdated the other day as it is all they can use at work and she has no pc at home. Some people have no idea - does that mean they are a bad person? It's fine that we debate it, we like this kind of thing. To other people, this is just something they don't have to worry about - or at least worry until it affects them personally

    I'm with you - but the people I deal with are on the other side of the fence. Isn't that more worrying than the exploit itself in a way?
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  16. #30
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    12,986
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,588 times in 1,343 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

    I do wonder to what degree people assume that if their identity is stolen through use of Spectre on a drive by web attack, that the state/world/Google/Apple (choose your modern deity) will magically put it all right for them. But then if people who don't understand the technology do understand the potential consequences, they would likely just stop using computing devices out of fear.

  17. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

    From email conversation I mentioned above....

    "That's work rubbishrubbishrubbishrubbish. They can sort it that's what they're paid to do"
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  18. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    434
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked
    15 times in 14 posts

    Re: Progress: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 put in shade by Pentium J5005

    My main right rig is still running a Q6600!! With DDR2 RAM no less!

    Can confirm that of course it is not naturally immune to spectre/meltdown.

    Kept getting by with other upgrades to SSD, GPU, extra RAM (dang DDR2 is rarefied and expensive now...).
    Been meaning to upgrade for the last 6 or 7 years but simply haven't been able to get round to it because, you know, thing.

    ::runs away and hides in shame::

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •