Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 24 of 24

Thread: Call of Duty update prompts '84GB' to trend on Twitter

  1. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    555
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    28 times in 22 posts
    • Rubarb's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI H81m-E33
      • CPU:
      • G3258
      • Memory:
      • 8GB hyper x beast
      • Storage:
      • 120ssd, 2gb hdd
      • Graphics card(s):
      • msi gtx960 4gb
      • PSU:
      • seasonic 450w
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake mozrt tx
      • Operating System:
      • windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • samsung 24'
      • Internet:
      • 100mb

    Re: Call of Duty update prompts '84GB' to trend on Twitter

    84 gb! ............. the game aint worth that sorry but you aint no 15mb of doom!

  2. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    772
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    9 times in 9 posts

    Re: Call of Duty update prompts '84GB' to trend on Twitter

    20-30mins download... or so

  3. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    354
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    46 times in 37 posts
    • Spank's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Hero X
      • CPU:
      • 8770K
      • Memory:
      • G.Skill 16GB 3200MHZ
      • Storage:
      • 1TB 970 EVO, 512GB 960PRO, 500GB 860EVO & 6GB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus 1080Ti ROG Strix oc
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Tower 900
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Alienware AW3418DW
      • Internet:
      • 52 Meg Fiber

    Re: Call of Duty update prompts '84GB' to trend on Twitter

    Quote Originally Posted by QuorTek View Post
    20-30mins download... or so
    How did you manage that? it took most of the day for me.

  4. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    329
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    8 times in 7 posts

    Re: Call of Duty update prompts '84GB' to trend on Twitter

    The next gen console will be expensive, mostly due to the SSD, the benefit is they should bring SSD prices done, closer to mainstream users expectations.

    The other downside is that once they become more popular, we'll have the manufacturers and suppliers claiming lack of supply and fixing prices again, the circle of life.

  5. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    240
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    6 times in 6 posts
    • davesom555's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock B450M
      • CPU:
      • AMD 2600@4ghz
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair 3000mhz
      • Storage:
      • 500gb Samsung 970 Evo NVME + multiple 2.5" SSDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Vega 56 Pulse
      • PSU:
      • EVGA 700w
      • Case:
      • NZXT H400i mATX
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 27" QHD 144mhz
      • Internet:
      • 200mb

    Re: Call of Duty update prompts '84GB' to trend on Twitter

    Yeah it doesn't help that you can only Download the game at 100kb a second either due to server load.

  6. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    12,116
    Thanks
    906
    Thanked
    583 times in 408 posts

    Re: Call of Duty update prompts '84GB' to trend on Twitter

    Not even switching to the servers in the states helped...

  7. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    772
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    9 times in 9 posts

    Re: Call of Duty update prompts '84GB' to trend on Twitter

    Quote Originally Posted by Spank View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by QuorTek View Post
    20-30mins download... or so
    How did you manage that? it took most of the day for me.
    Fiber

  8. #24
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: Call of Duty update prompts '84GB' to trend on Twitter

    Quote Originally Posted by QuorTek View Post
    Fiber
    That's irrelevant when you're sever limited to sub-1Mb speeds most of the time as lots of people have been.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •