Originally Posted by
Spud1
It's a fair question..I guess I would like them to be clear on which scenes they have chosen to run for each game, are the numbers average or max FPS, and what specific settings they have enabled/disabled - noting that simple setting "high" or "highest" in most AAA games now only impacts a % of the graphics options, and they are clearly manipulating them by messing with AA for example. That makes sense given the impact it has on some of those titles, but does skew the results.
They are clearly choosing specific setting combinations & games to show off the 6800XT Vs 3080 (as you would), and since all benchmarks have "SAM" enabled & are only on a ryzen system, I still think they are basically worthless and can't be used to compare..its apples vs oranges atm.
No surprise mind, but we have to think of these numbers are part of a marketing/sales pitch, rather than a true representation of exactly what we'll see in the real world. I don't believe they add any value to the consumer over and above the slides we saw last week. Nvidia are no better here I must add, they are both at it.