Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: AMD, Intel, VIA, SiS - Exposed.. Q1 2004 Review

  1. #1
    DR
    DR is offline
    on ye old ship HEXUS DR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    HEXUS HQ, Elstree
    Posts
    13,412
    Thanks
    1,060
    Thanked
    841 times in 373 posts

    AMD, Intel, VIA, SiS - Exposed.. Q1 2004 Review

    Following on from their dual-channel P4 chipset, PT880, VIA's Q1 (early Q2 most likely, but it could be close) chipset plans for Pentium 4 run to PT890. It basically mirrors what Intel are releasing with i925X. PT890 is a dual-channel chipset supporting Prescott and Northwood processors (including Extreme Editions), DDR and DDR-II memory and PCI Express.

    Where i925X (including ICH6) seems to only implement a 16x lane for graphics and a 1x lane for peripherals, VIA will implement 16x for graphics in the PT890 bridge but also push their board partners to use VT8251 which carries two 1x peripheral lanes. More on the southbridge later.
    URL: http://www.hexus.net/content/reviews...JsX3BhZ2U9MQ==

  2. #2
    TiG
    TiG is offline
    Walk a mile in other peoples shoes...
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Questioning it all
    Posts
    6,213
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked
    47 times in 42 posts
    Just like to say I thoroughly enjoyed reading this, Its great to get this sort of review in a single place, I shall keep it bookmarked as an easy to follow guide to all the socket madness coming up.

    Well written Rys.

    TiG
    -- Hexus Meets Rock! --

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    272
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Nice article - Could u possibly confirm rumours I've been hearing about that when the Athlon64 goes to the 9nm shrink it will also bring with it a HyperThreading-type core-enhancement?

    Cheers

    Si

  4. #4
    Rys
    Rys is offline
    Tiled
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Abbots Langley
    Posts
    1,479
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 1 post
    Chip multi processing with two cores on the same die/package? Hammer was designed for that from day one, I wouldn't be surprised if they did roll it out. CMP is the next big thing in x86 land.

    A form of HyperThreading though? Nope, 'fraid not.

    Glad you like the article, it's just had an update to mention the name changes on AMD's upcoming Socket 939 chips.

    Rys
    MOLLY AND POPPY!

  5. #5
    DR
    DR is offline
    on ye old ship HEXUS DR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    HEXUS HQ, Elstree
    Posts
    13,412
    Thanks
    1,060
    Thanked
    841 times in 373 posts
    Intel touted Hyperthreading as a solution to not having an integrated memory controller.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Do you get an 'XP rating' applied when you o/c?
    By Austin in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 11-12-2003, 03:10 PM
  2. The Great Debate - AMD or Intel
    By Dave_07 in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 09-10-2003, 09:42 PM
  3. SFF FAQ And Drivers - Updated 13th June 2004
    By XTR in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-08-2003, 02:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •