Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 17 to 32 of 35

Thread: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

  1. #17
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,038
    Thanks
    1,880
    Thanked
    3,379 times in 2,716 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

    Quote Originally Posted by bigstu View Post
    Where are all the 1500mhz+ RX480s
    Why are you expecting 1500+mhz 480s?

  2. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    1,722
    Thanks
    199
    Thanked
    243 times in 223 posts
    • kompukare's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V LX
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5-3570K
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 8GB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 850 EVo 500GB | Corsair MP510 960GB | 2 x WD 4TB spinners
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sappihre R7 260X 1GB (sic)
      • PSU:
      • Antec 650 Gold TruePower (Seasonic)
      • Case:
      • Aerocool DS 200 (silenced, 53.6 litres)l)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10-64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x ViewSonic 27" 1440p

    Re: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

    Quote Originally Posted by Cr@ig View Post
    Please correct me where i am going wrong but Techpowerup are Running at and i quote "All games are set to their highest quality setting unless indicated otherwise".

    A. Why would you not run at max settings if playable frame rates
    B. Why if your running lower settings are they lower frame rates?
    C. Hardware is almost identical for rest of system

    Www.Confused.com
    As kalniel and Tarinder already said: what scene is being benchmarked?

    Skyrim (or any Elder Scrolls Game) does not have a built-in benchmark. Neither does Fallout 4. So what people are generally doing is using a save game and repeating a certain look around (for example Skyrim Dragonreach view-around) or moves. Totally dependent on where this save game is though, so not ideal for comparing sites but should be roughly repeatable for benchmark runs.
    Actually for Skyrim, something like the intro carriage ride or a similar 'cut scene' would probably be better except that the intro is not taxing.

  3. #19
    Senior Member cptwhite_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    4,452
    Thanks
    516
    Thanked
    685 times in 473 posts
    • cptwhite_uk's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS TUF B650 Plus Wifi
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 7800X3D
      • Memory:
      • 32Gb DRR5 6400 C32 Team Group T-Create
      • Storage:
      • 4Tb Crucial P3 Plus
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RTX 4080 20Gb Gigabyte Gaming OC
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 850W 80+ Gold
      • Case:
      • Fractal North Charcoal / Walnut
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Gigabyte M28U (4K 144Hz)
      • Internet:
      • BT 500 Mbps

    Re: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    But the 970 came out 22 months ago, not 10. If you buy a year after release then you should get a better deal and/or bundled extras which you can sell on. At the moment these chips are brand new so are expected to be a bit pricier.
    While I appreciate what you're saying and I do realise they have advantages in VR and power draw. In terms of raw performance / pound they're significantly worse than my GTX970 purchase. All that matters is performance today and price today and in that regard they're way off the mark. What difference does it make to my experience when a card was released if they perform roughly on par?

  4. #20
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    WestSussex
    Posts
    94
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    11 times in 9 posts
    • CountBartok's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Sabertooth 990fx R2.0
      • CPU:
      • FX8320
      • Memory:
      • 8gb Geil BlackDragon 1866
      • Storage:
      • 120gb Mushkin chronos + 2tb WD Black.
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI 290 4gb
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic G-Series 750w
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master Cosmos
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2312HM

    Re: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

    Quote Originally Posted by Cr@ig View Post
    Techpowerup? vs Hexus? Rx480 vs Gtx 1060 reviews both running 6700k at 4.4ghz and 4.5ghz and with 16gb ram and 32gb ram

    Fallout 4 2560x1440 Techpowerup Rx480 74.3 vs Hexus 51.0
    Fallout 4 2560x1440 Techpowerup Gtx1060 74.2 vs Hexus 59.0

    ROTR 2560x1440 Techpowerup Rx480 44.6 vs Hexus 50
    ROTR 2560x1440 Techpowerup Gtx1060 46.3 vs Hexus 63

    How on earth can the reviews be so far out from one site to the next?
    Well for one Techpowerup are using Crimson 16.7.1 Beta. Hexus are using Crimson 16.7.2.
    And as I mentioned when the referance card came out the Techpowerup benches where lower than all other reviews I read. I have nothing against techpowerup.

  5. #21
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,038
    Thanks
    1,880
    Thanked
    3,379 times in 2,716 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

    Quote Originally Posted by cptwhite_uk View Post
    While I appreciate what you're saying and I do realise they have advantages in VR and power draw. In terms of raw performance / pound they're significantly worse than my GTX970 purchase. All that matters is performance today and price today and in that regard they're way off the mark. What difference does it make to my experience when a card was released if they perform roughly on par?
    I get what you're saying, but I think it's just a bit disingenuous to compare the just launched price to the established price 12 months after release. When you bought your card the 480 wasn't even available so it couldn't be compared. Now, for a very limited time, they overlap. In the not too distant future you won't be able to buy old 970 stock, and the 480 will drop in price when stock arrives in volume. But yes - if you have to buy a card today, then the Strix 480 doesn't make a good value argument (unless you are considering freesync or dx12 of course). Of course, a second hand card might given even better still value.

  6. #22
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    13,009
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,568 times in 1,325 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

    I think the major disadvantage of getting a 970/980 right now is: if you keep things a long time, then you might get to the end of mainline driver support as you are already 2 years into the roughly 5 year support cycle.

  7. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Wakefield
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • bigstu's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V Premium
      • CPU:
      • i7 3770k
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair vengeance
      • Storage:
      • Samsung EVO 840 250GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • X2 Sapphire HD7950 watercolled EK blocks
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 700W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li v2000 pro custom modded for watercooling
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • X2 Iiyama Prolite GB2488HSU-B1 144Hz
      • Internet:
      • BT fibre 40MB

    Re: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    Why are you expecting 1500+mhz 480s?
    Many reference card reviews i read surmised that due to the average cooling and poor power delivery, overclocking was stifled and with improvements made in these areas 1500mhz shouldn't be too hard to achieve, obviously they were wrong.

  8. #24
    Senior Member Xlucine's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,162
    Thanks
    298
    Thanked
    188 times in 147 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus prime B650M-A II
      • CPU:
      • 7900
      • Memory:
      • 32GB @ 4.8 Gt/s (don't want to wait for memory training)
      • Storage:
      • Crucial P5+ 2TB (boot), Crucial P5 1TB, Crucial MX500 1TB, Crucial MX100 512GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Dual 4070 w/ shroud mod
      • PSU:
      • Fractal Design ION+ 560P
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E
      • Operating System:
      • W10 pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic vx3211-2k-mhd, Dell P2414H
      • Internet:
      • Gigabit symmetrical

    Re: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

    I guess the lack of other cards in testing was for expediency, given this launch is a month late already? If it is then I agree with the logic

    Quote Originally Posted by cptwhite_uk View Post
    While I appreciate what you're saying and I do realise they have advantages in VR and power draw. In terms of raw performance / pound they're significantly worse than my GTX970 purchase. All that matters is performance today and price today and in that regard they're way off the mark. What difference does it make to my experience when a card was released if they perform roughly on par?
    Price today matters, but unless you upgrade religiously then performance tomorrow should be part of your considerations

  9. #25
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,038
    Thanks
    1,880
    Thanked
    3,379 times in 2,716 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

    Quote Originally Posted by bigstu View Post
    Many reference card reviews i read surmised that due to the average cooling and poor power delivery, overclocking was stifled and with improvements made in these areas 1500mhz shouldn't be too hard to achieve, obviously they were wrong.
    Have you got any links? I don't remember seeing a single review saying 1500mhz shouldn't be too hard to achieve but you saw many? I'd want to avoid such sites in the future if they're so inaccurate.

  10. #26
    Now 100% Apple free cheesemp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Near the New forest
    Posts
    2,948
    Thanks
    354
    Thanked
    255 times in 173 posts
    • cheesemp's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS TUF x570-plus
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 3600
      • Memory:
      • 16gb Corsair RGB ram
      • Storage:
      • 256Gb NVMe + 500Gb TcSunbow SDD (cheap for games only)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX 480 8Gb Nitro+ OC (with auto OC to above 580 speeds!)
      • PSU:
      • Cooler Master MWE 750 bronze
      • Case:
      • Gamemax f15m
      • Operating System:
      • Win 11
      • Monitor(s):
      • 32" QHD AOC Q3279VWF
      • Internet:
      • FTTC ~35Mb

    Re: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

    Quote Originally Posted by Tarinder View Post
    We have both the 4GB and 8GB Nitros on the test bench. Review coming on Friday.
    Cheers Tarinder!

    Hoping you can get to the bottom of overclocking these cards as rumour has it the default AMD wattman tool is poor with voltage overclocking and the sapphire tool will be better (once its available)...
    Trust

    Laptop : Dell Inspiron 1545 with Ryzen 5500u, 16gb and 256 NVMe, Windows 11.

  11. #27
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,232
    Thanked
    2,290 times in 1,873 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    Have you got any links? I don't remember seeing a single review saying 1500mhz shouldn't be too hard to achieve ...
    Indeed, the absolute best air-cooled OC results I saw, with a HUGE aftermarket cooler strapped on, only reached 1450MHz. 1500MHz was only acheivable with a custom water loop. 1500Mhz is probably achievable, but it's not going to be easy or straightforward, and you certainly won't get any board partner guaranteeing it out of the box...

  12. #28
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    32
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • Iconix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z87-A
      • CPU:
      • Core i5-4670K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB HyperX 2400Mhz
      • Case:
      • Lancool PC-K59

    Re: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

    Quote Originally Posted by cheesemp View Post
    rumour has it the default AMD wattman tool is poor with voltage overclocking
    What tool was used to do the overclocking in this review, WattMan or GPUTweak? I didn't see any mention.

  13. #29
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    64
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts

    Re: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

    Quote Originally Posted by Cr@ig View Post
    Techpowerup? vs Hexus? Rx480 vs Gtx 1060 reviews both running 6700k at 4.4ghz and 4.5ghz and with 16gb ram and 32gb ram

    Fallout 4 2560x1440 Techpowerup Rx480 74.3 vs Hexus 51.0
    Fallout 4 2560x1440 Techpowerup Gtx1060 74.2 vs Hexus 59.0

    ROTR 2560x1440 Techpowerup Rx480 44.6 vs Hexus 50
    ROTR 2560x1440 Techpowerup Gtx1060 46.3 vs Hexus 63

    How on earth can the reviews be so far out from one site to the next?
    Hexus is paid by Nvidia, that is why they use the old driver for Tomb Raider that runs ALL AMD cards like trash, when the new patch ups their performance by over 20% percent across the board, so AMD cards become as fast as the competition.

    They also run several of the games in DX11 when DX12 is available and still run the terrible and old openGL driver, when Vulkan is available.

    They also don't test games like Dota 2 in Vulkan and Assasins Creed games who use newer technology for rendering of their games.

  14. #30
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,232
    Thanked
    2,290 times in 1,873 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

    Quote Originally Posted by SlickR View Post
    Hexus is paid by Nvidia ...
    Want to provide any evidence to back up that statement, or do you just enjoy randomly slandering companies on forums they own?

    Tarinder has already stated in previous reviews that hexus are in the process of updating their benchmark selection. They only do that once every couple of years so that you can compare reviews between generations in a useful way (if every review used a different set of benchmarks you couldn't do any comparisons without rebenchmarking ALL cards, and that is prohibitively time consuming). As it is, I hardly think Doom in Vulkan or Hitman are benchmarks that are designed to make the RX 480 look bad, given it trounces the GTX 1060 in both those benchmarks; neither are The Division or Total War: Warhammer, in which the performance is even overall. Given that the RX 480 is generally accepted to be slower than the GTX 1060 across a wide range of games (TPU run around 15 games and found the 1060 to be overall ~ 6% faster), Hexus using 3 games where the GTX 1060 is faster, 2 where the RX 480 is faster, and 2 where they're about equal, is probably fair. They also show the OpenGL figures for Doom, sure, and that loks bad for AMD because their OpenGL drivers are just that awful. There's still a few OGL-only games out there, and if you're playing those games an RX 480 is going to suck because AMD's drivers are bad. I think that's also a valid point to make in a review - particularly when it's balanced by a demonstration of how good the RX 480 is in Vulkan for that title.

    Horses for courses. Hexus generally have a fairly well balanced review. The GTX 1060 is almost certainly a technically better card than the RX 480. I think you'll have a hard time proving that Hexus' review is particularly biased towards nvidia. At which point, it's probably a bad idea to accuse them of deliberately favouring nvidia for financial reasons. That's a pretty serious accusation...

  15. #31
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

    I've been waiting for this review - thanks!
    Were the temperatures achievd with the same fan speeds or were the RX480s fans spinning faster?
    Did the cards produce any coil whine?

  16. #32
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    WestSussex
    Posts
    94
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    11 times in 9 posts
    • CountBartok's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Sabertooth 990fx R2.0
      • CPU:
      • FX8320
      • Memory:
      • 8gb Geil BlackDragon 1866
      • Storage:
      • 120gb Mushkin chronos + 2tb WD Black.
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI 290 4gb
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic G-Series 750w
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master Cosmos
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2312HM

    Re: Asus ROG Strix Radeon RX 480 OC

    Quote Originally Posted by SlickR View Post
    Hexus is paid by Nvidia, that is why they use the old driver for Tomb Raider that runs ALL AMD cards like trash, when the new patch ups their performance by over 20% percent across the board, so AMD cards become as fast as the competition.

    They also run several of the games in DX11 when DX12 is available and still run the terrible and old openGL driver, when Vulkan is available.

    They also don't test games like Dota 2 in Vulkan and Assasins Creed games who use newer technology for rendering of their games.
    What absolute rubbish. Hexus are using a more recent crimson driver and are running Dx12 where the games suport it. Also between the referance card being launched and this card they have added the vulkan benchmark to doom.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •