Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 17

Thread: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    27,725
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,729 times in 598 posts

    AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

    2nd Gen Threadripper, now starting at $649.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    My happy place
    Posts
    146
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked
    10 times in 9 posts
    • afiretruck's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X399 Designare Ex
      • CPU:
      • AMD Threadripper 1900X
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 32GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 250GB NVMe SSD RAID 1 (root) + 1.25TB SSD RAID 5 (6 x 250GB) (home) + 900p 280GB SSD (scratch)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX Vega 64 (Linux)
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RMi 850
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Core X71
      • Operating System:
      • Arch Linux (Antergos)

    Re: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

    It would be really interesting to see how the 2990wx and 2970wx compare to their EPYC counterparts in multi-threaded workloads. EPYC has the advantage of twice the memory channels and all cores having direct local memory access, where Threadripper has the clock speed advantages.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Lanky123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Oxford
    Posts
    886
    Thanks
    86
    Thanked
    141 times in 93 posts
    • Lanky123's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 4570
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 4GB Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 250GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD + 2+4TB HDD + 3TB Synology DS216SE
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI Radeon R9 270X HAWK
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone Strider 400W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Sugo SG02B-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 / Ubuntu 16.04
      • Monitor(s):
      • ElectriQ 32" 4k IPS + Dell 22" U2212HM
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 60Mbit/s

    Re: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

    Enough with the TDP derived Bang4Watt scores...they're just so detached from reality as to be worthless. You can see on the Blender system-wide power consumption that there's a 61W (44%) difference between the 8700k and 9900k despite the same 95W TDP. The new Threadrippers with some cores disabled appear to save ~ 5 - 10% in power draw compared to their full-fat counterparts yet have the same official TDP.

    If it's not possible to isolate CPU power usage while running a benchmark just use the measured system-wide power consumption. That's what end users will be paying their electricity company for anyway.

  4. Received thanks from:

    Corky34 (30-10-2018),edmundhonda (29-10-2018),Iota (29-10-2018)

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Geneva, Switzerland
    Posts
    177
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    9 times in 5 posts

    Re: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

    Hi, I agree with Lanky123, the Bang4Watt score is useless, as all it takes is to see the actual power consumption and things start to be different. Intel is using legal hole, to show his CPU at 95W, though for most of the time, when taxed, it will go over it a lot.
    So for the people who actually care the Bang4Watt, they would likely use the real measurements and not label numbers.


    And so-so gaming? These machines most of the time have powerful GPUs and 4K screen attached to them. Gaming is on the par,but they beat Intel in production. So...
    The more you live, less you die. More you play, more you die. Isn't it great.

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Where you are not
    Posts
    467
    Thanks
    165
    Thanked
    37 times in 30 posts
    • Iota's system
      • Motherboard:
      • GA-P67A-UD5-B3
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 2600K
      • Memory:
      • 2 x BL2KIT25664FN2139
      • Storage:
      • 4 x CTFDDAC064MAG-1G1 (Raid 0)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS Radeon R9 290 DC-2
      • PSU:
      • Corsair Professional Series Gold AX750
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-X500B
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2x Samsung 22" widescreen P2270 2ms DVI HD LCD TFT Ecofit
      • Internet:
      • 40Mbps SKY Fibre

    Re: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

    Quote Originally Posted by Lanky123 View Post
    Enough with the TDP derived Bang4Watt scores...they're just so detached from reality as to be worthless. You can see on the Blender system-wide power consumption that there's a 61W (44%) difference between the 8700k and 9900k despite the same 95W TDP. The new Threadrippers with some cores disabled appear to save ~ 5 - 10% in power draw compared to their full-fat counterparts yet have the same official TDP.

    If it's not possible to isolate CPU power usage while running a benchmark just use the measured system-wide power consumption. That's what end users will be paying their electricity company for anyway.
    Actually, I think Anandtech have a better approach looking at the power usage - https://www.anandtech.com/show/13516...2970wx-2920x/2

    When you look at something like the i9 9900k using 168W at full load, when it is meant to be a 95W part, it definitely shows up the difference in how Intel and AMD define the TDP. AMD is closer to reality it seems.

  7. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

    Does not look like my earlier attempt at comment made it.

    Be interesting to see results with Processor affinity set to exclude Core Zero as this has seen performance uplifts in some area's per the article issues with core/thread utilisation issues.

  8. #7
    I really don't care Dashers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    885
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked
    105 times in 86 posts
    • Dashers's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-5930K
      • Memory:
      • Corsair DDR4 3000 Quad
      • Storage:
      • Intel 750 PCIe SSD; RAID-0 x2 Samsung 840 EVO; RAID-0 x2 WD Black; RAID-0 x2 Crucial MX500
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GeForce GTX 970 x2 SLI
      • PSU:
      • CoolerMaster Silent Pro M2 720W
      • Case:
      • Corsair 500R
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • x2 23.5" 1080 72Hz OC
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTTC

    Re: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

    As a Haswell-E user, I'm very interested in this, but especially the 2920X (lets not get silly with the costs guys, over three hundred quid for a CPU is already crazy). Up until the gaming tests, the 2920X looked like a no-brainer, but the difference in gaming is really quite marked. I find that surprising and disappointing.

  9. #8
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    14,871
    Thanks
    1,172
    Thanked
    2,182 times in 1,805 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • HP Pavilion
      • CPU:
      • A10 4600M
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR3-1600 SODIMM
      • Storage:
      • 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon HD7660G (IGP)
      • PSU:
      • Battery/HP 19v brick
      • Case:
      • HP Pavilion G6
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1366x768 laptop panel

    Re: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

    Quote Originally Posted by Dashers View Post
    As a Haswell-E user, I'm very interested in this ... the difference in gaming is really quite marked. I find that surprising and disappointing.
    1) There's no Haswell-E in this line up. Haswell -> Skylake was (iirc) around a 15% IPC increase, so the HEDT Intels on display have both IPC and clock speed advantages over your existing rig.

    2) The gaming difference is only "quite marked" at 1080p with a very high end GPU, and even then in two of the games tested the 2920X is pushing out minimum framerates over 60fps (and in the other no CPU is getting over 50fps minimum). So the question becomes what games, what resolution and what GPU? Because at 4k with a 1080 Ti, there is no meaningful difference in gaming performance...

  10. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,526
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked
    312 times in 217 posts

    Re: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

    Quote Originally Posted by Lanky123 View Post
    Enough with the TDP derived Bang4Watt scores...they're just so detached from reality as to be worthless.

    If it's not possible to isolate CPU power usage while running a benchmark just use the measured system-wide power consumption. That's what end users will be paying their electricity company for anyway.
    ^^This^^ x100.

    Both companies calculate TDP differently so as to make using it for a metric completely useless, either do it via system-wide power consumption, don't do it at all, or attempt to account for all the variables between the two different ways of calculating TDP.

  11. #10
    HEXUS.timelord. Zak33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    I'm a Jessie
    Posts
    33,775
    Thanks
    2,418
    Thanked
    2,553 times in 1,604 posts
    • Zak33's system
      • Storage:
      • Kingston HyperX SSD, Hitachi 1Tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 1060
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 800w
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT01
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTC uber speedy

    Re: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

    I have to say that very few products are named according to their ability... but the Threadripper does exactly what it says on the tin.

    It rips threads.

    End of

    Quote Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
    "The second you aren't paying attention to the tool you're using, it will take your fingers from you. It does not know sympathy." |
    "If you don't gaffer it, it will gaffer you" | "Belt and braces"

  12. #11
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Strand, Cape Town, Western-Cape
    Posts
    74
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    • KN1GHT's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Hero 6 x370 (Wi-Fi)
      • CPU:
      • AMD R7-1700 @ 3.918GHz (1.35v)
      • Memory:
      • 32GB's of 3200MHz Gskill Ripjaws @ 3066MHz
      • Storage:
      • 250GB Samsung 960 EVO, 250GB 5400RPM, 500GB 7200RPM, 1TB 7200RPM, 2TB 7200RPM
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1xPalit Zetstream GTX1080ti @ 2025Core & 5900Mem
      • PSU:
      • Andyson AD-700YYZZZ N Series 700W 80 Plus Titanium Certified Semi-Modular Black Desktop Power Supply
      • Case:
      • Phanteks PH-EC416PSTG_BK Eclipse P400S Silent-Edition Tempered Glass Satin Black Steel
      • Operating System:
      • Dual Boot Windows 7 Pro & Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 1xSamsung 32inch LED TV (1366x768 native) & 1xAcer 23inch (1920x1080) using DSR (3840x2160)
      • Internet:
      • 4mbps uncapped

    Re: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

    Quote Originally Posted by Dashers View Post
    As a Haswell-E user, I'm very interested in this, but especially the 2920X (lets not get silly with the costs guys, over three hundred quid for a CPU is already crazy). Up until the gaming tests, the 2920X looked like a no-brainer, but the difference in gaming is really quite marked. I find that surprising and disappointing.
    Check more reviews it does seem that these chips are under performing a bit.
    Hardware Unboxed has a great review as well.

  13. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    205
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts

    Re: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

    "Would you really be pairing a high-end desktop CPU and GeForce GTX 1080 Ti with gaming at 1080p? Unlikely."
    $699 cpu, for a 1080ti...YES, for sure as 4k means nothing to me for years unless they pop out a bunch of 16:10 stuff soon. I can wait and the fps you get with everything turned on in EVERY game means perf sucks. It's against my religion to NOT play a game exactly the way the devs wanted me to see it. Turning stuff down is dumb.

    As for the chips above this, I have no use for that many cores, currently not even work stuff at that price but not saying AMD shouldn't be charging that much (charge as high as you can get!).

  14. #13
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    9,327
    Thanks
    443
    Thanked
    945 times in 805 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • M5A-97 EVO R2.0
      • CPU:
      • FX-8350
      • Memory:
      • 16GB ECC 1333
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 28 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

    Any chance you guys can try running y-cruncher on those CPUs? Intel has a factor of two at the top of the table over the AMD chips (and unlike PiFast this seems to be decent up to date code so means something) but their home page only has old thread rippers on it.

    http://www.numberworld.org/y-crunche...charts/1b.html

  15. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    226
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    5 times in 4 posts

    Re: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    2) The gaming difference is only "quite marked" at 1080p with a very high end GPU, and even then in two of the games tested the 2920X is pushing out minimum framerates over 60fps (and in the other no CPU is getting over 50fps minimum). So the question becomes what games, what resolution and what GPU? Because at 4k with a 1080 Ti, there is no meaningful difference in gaming performance...
    While a fair argument, it still shows a CPU bottleneck. I'd imagine more gamers tend to upgrade their gpu than their cpu, particularly for intel where you need a new mobo and also ram if your system is particularly old. Another factor is that some people seem to swear by the 144 Hz monitors over 4k so going AMD will cap your use you can get out of it. Personally I'm hoping AMD can compete more in that area next year and then I can decide to finally take the plunge.

  16. #15
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    9,327
    Thanks
    443
    Thanked
    945 times in 805 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • M5A-97 EVO R2.0
      • CPU:
      • FX-8350
      • Memory:
      • 16GB ECC 1333
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 28 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

    Quote Originally Posted by FRISH View Post
    Another factor is that some people seem to swear by the 144 Hz monitors over 4k so going AMD will cap your use you can get out of it
    As someone who swears by their 144Hz 1440p monitor I have to say it has given my old fx8350 an expended life as I can now tolerate low frame rate so much more than with my old 60Hz monitor. So sorry, that doesn't help your argument. If there is a bottleneck, then you can see it in the 4K minimum frame rates as those actually matter now rather than giving some mythical guess about the future.

    Telling someone with a 4K monitor that they have a 1080p bottleneck is like telling me I am too fat to use the kitchen door because I can't get through the cat flap.

  17. Received thanks from:

    CAT-THE-FIFTH (04-11-2018)

  18. #16
    Bows out! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Hopefully somewhere less backstabby
    Posts
    28,789
    Thanks
    3,203
    Thanked
    4,455 times in 3,441 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and 2920X

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    As someone who swears by their 144Hz 1440p monitor I have to say it has given my old fx8350 an expended life as I can now tolerate low frame rate so much more than with my old 60Hz monitor. So sorry, that doesn't help your argument. If there is a bottleneck, then you can see it in the 4K minimum frame rates as those actually matter now rather than giving some mythical guess about the future.

    Telling someone with a 4K monitor that they have a 1080p bottleneck is like telling me I am too fat to use the kitchen door because I can't get through the cat flap.
    This. A proper CPU bottleneck will be seen even at qHD. My two most CPU bottlenecked non-RTS games are Fallout 4 and Planetside 2 and I could see the same kind of minimums,even at 1680X1050 and 1920X1080.


    Those despicable Elk,stealing the pond weed!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •