Basically as most of you know BT are investing a lot of money (billions) into laying out fibre optics. Rather than digging up the ground they are laying it in the sewer system up to the green boxes (being replaced by some bigger boxes) on streets. From the boxes down your streets and to your home they are still using the old copper wiring.
Ok now virgin on the other hand have got fibre optic to the exchange NOT to the green boxes. The rest is thick coax cables going to the green box and then thinner cables to the homes.
What I don’t get is that how are virgin still able to deploy 50mb with only fibre to the exchange and BT only being able to do 40mb!!!!
So while BT are having an ‘e-rubbishrubbishrubbishrubbish’ on their new (but yet so rubbish push into keeping up with the 20th century let alone the 21st) bandwidth capabilities, Virgin are experimenting with fibre to the home and deploying 100mb!
BT have owned the entire network since 1980 (I think) and are all over the UK, renting out their network to other provides too. Their revenue this year was approx 800million. They must be able to afford the investment of putting in the extra miles up to the homes!! Or at least coax the last mile if fibre is too much. If they could broadband would not only be reliable but also cheaper do to more fierce competition with its rival Virgin.