Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Network Capping...

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    HHXC
    Posts
    806
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    • Areku's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5Q Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 3.00Hz + Xigmatek HDT-S1283
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 2GB Corsair TwinX DDR2 6400 5-5-5-15
      • Storage:
      • Seagates -160GB IDE, 500GB SATA, 750GB SATA / Maxtor 250GB SATA
      • Graphics card(s):
      • BFG 8800GTS OC 320MB
      • PSU:
      • HX520W Corsair
      • Case:
      • Akasa Eclipse
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Iiyama ProLite E435s & LG 22" TFT
      • Internet:
      • 10Mbit Virgin Media

    Question Network Capping...

    Ok so next year i will be moving in with some friends. Internet is going to be a must so going to network all the pc's in the joint. So the problem is i know that they will be downloading whatever they can from wherever they may find it. So what im looking for is a way to evenly cap the connection for each pc. Is there such a tool which will help me to do this?

    Thanks if anyone has an answer.

  2. #2
    Splash
    Guest
    I'd look into various proxying apps...

  3. #3
    Senior Member Merlin4458's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Kingston Uni
    Posts
    2,606
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked
    11 times in 11 posts
    Im guessing ur going to want to be gaming and not want a high ping. Im im the same boat m8 and am yet to find any hardware that will dish out certain bandwidth to each pc without it still effecting
    Rig: Amd 64 3700+ San Diego | Abit AT8 | 4x512 Corsair XMS3200C2PRO | PowerColour X850XTPE / Arctic Cooled | Samsung Spinpoint 250Gig | Enermax NoiseTake 485w | Arctic Freezer 64 Pro | Coolermaster Wavemaster Silver | Dell 2405FPW | Logitech G5 / Everglide Destrukt Monstermat |

  4. #4
    Banned cm_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Big Shell
    Posts
    939
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    what connection you going for?

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Terry and June Land
    Posts
    167
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I don't think you can cap each PC - you would need to write your own code for that i think, and you would need to determine what is traffic destined for the web which is going to be very tricky!

    Closest thing I can think of is enabling QoS, which wont enforce any cpas on "isp bandwidth" but will reserve bandwith on your lan

    HTH

  6. #6
    Time for Walkies... Atomic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    1,959
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

  7. #7
    Administrator Moby-Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    There's no place like ::1 (IPv6 version)
    Posts
    10,665
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked
    384 times in 313 posts
    or try one of these as a gateway machine.

    http://www.m0n0.ch/wall/
    my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net

  8. #8
    VTECmeous Vimeous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    2,006
    Thanks
    62
    Thanked
    52 times in 51 posts
    If you've got any cash handy then a buy a Draytek 2600 series router. Yes they are expensive (at least £125incVAT for the 2600 Plus) but offer individual port bandwidth capping.
    Oh and a decent firewall, ADSL modem, 4-port switch, USB print server, proper VPN connection (not just pass-through) and options on VoIP and wireless.

    I will be investigating Moby's link as well however, it looks v interesting
    Vimeous : i7 7700K | 16Gb | ASUS Strix Z270G | GTX1080 | 960 EVO 500GB NVMe | 850 EVO 500GB | TX650W | NZXT S340 Elite | Dell U2713H + 17" | 10 Pro
    Willowin : i7 3570K | 16Gb | ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe | GTX 660 TI | 2x 1TB 840EVO | Sugo SG05BB-450 | Dell U2713H + 17" | 8.1 Pro
    Svr : X2 4200+ | 2Gb | ASUS A8N-SLI Premium | HD6870 | SonicFury | 8x 250Gb (2x RAID10) | 3Ware 9650SE-8LPML | Seasonic 700W | CM Stacker 830 | XP Pro
    NAS : DS1511+ | DX513
    W : Dell Precision T3610 | E5-1650 V2 | 16GB | Quadro K2000 | 256GB SSD | 1TB HDD | 8.1 Pro | 2x Dell U2515H


  9. #9
    Administrator Moby-Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    There's no place like ::1 (IPv6 version)
    Posts
    10,665
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked
    384 times in 313 posts
    wo0h0o another Draytek convert

    they are very nice bits of kit for home and small business use.

    I think there is a notable difference between traffic limiting and bandwidth shaping - I'll see if I can get a better explanation out of the network guy in my office , but I think that bandwidth /traffic shaping optimises the network flow so that if you have serveral objects using the bandwidth, the flow is adjusted so that best performance is achieved/ bandwidth is split up "fairly"
    my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    HHXC
    Posts
    806
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    • Areku's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5Q Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 3.00Hz + Xigmatek HDT-S1283
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 2GB Corsair TwinX DDR2 6400 5-5-5-15
      • Storage:
      • Seagates -160GB IDE, 500GB SATA, 750GB SATA / Maxtor 250GB SATA
      • Graphics card(s):
      • BFG 8800GTS OC 320MB
      • PSU:
      • HX520W Corsair
      • Case:
      • Akasa Eclipse
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Iiyama ProLite E435s & LG 22" TFT
      • Internet:
      • 10Mbit Virgin Media
    Quote Originally Posted by Atomic
    I use netlimiter. It doesnt allow you to control the amount of data on a network, only on the machine its installed on.

    Thanks for the link moby. I have read some of the documentation, it seems interesting, but i think i need to read a bit more before i completely get my head around it.

    If anyone else has any idea's/solutions they would be greatly appreciated.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    2,069
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    7 times in 3 posts
    they are very nice bits of kit for home
    Im going to have to disagree with you there. Nice, but unecessary. Not worth the money for 95%+ of home users I dont think. How often is the standard home user going to use all those features you are paying more for? Hardly ever. Why not get a £50 job that will do fine for the vast majority of people. I dont think they could justify the cost.

    For small business I would probably agree though. It's pretty good.
    Twigman

  12. #12
    Administrator Moby-Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    There's no place like ::1 (IPv6 version)
    Posts
    10,665
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked
    384 times in 313 posts
    depends - I think they woudl be worth the investment if you were looking at the VOIP functionality , built in print server and uPnP features.

    it is overkill for many people but they do have a market for things like home based workers ( IPsec VPN endpoint for example )
    my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net

  13. #13
    ?!
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,045
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    6 times in 5 posts
    Here's what I did - sod the draytek when you can use open source goodness + MIPS processing power.

    1x Linksys WRT54G router, £43.
    1x Freeman firmware that supports QoS, £0.

    Installed the GPL firmware onto the unit. Used the QoS filtering to drop priority on some data and give highest priority on others.

    Works very well. 7 NNTP connections consume 2.1 of 4mbit whilst I stream some video via http. MSN udp messages fly through. My PPTP packets are forwarded without an issue. Can be done on per MAC address or ethernet port basis too.

    Wireless is now active with TKIP and AES, along with a huge key. That'll take some time to break, and even if they could, it'll change before they do so. It can also block whatever protocols or keywords your looking for.

    It even has a working DNS update client that works with ZoneEdit.

    And it has the usual set of features like upnp etc.

    So why spend £125+ ?

    Edit : If gaming, tell the router only 90% of the line's capability, to ensure latency is smooth.

    Also, lots of other firmwares to turn it into a SIP gateway, VPN endpoint etc.
    Last edited by javalord; 21-07-2005 at 11:50 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. problems with XP's network bridge
    By Gubs in forum Networking and Broadband
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 27-09-2011, 11:03 PM
  2. Computer on network has lost connection to network
    By Furton in forum Networking and Broadband
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 19-08-2011, 04:31 PM
  3. Home network won't work, help!
    By klarrix in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-03-2005, 03:08 PM
  4. network bridge trauma
    By axiomatic in forum Networking and Broadband
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-02-2005, 09:41 AM
  5. Wired+Wireless home network purchasing recommendations...
    By D001 in forum Networking and Broadband
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-09-2003, 11:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •