Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 30 of 30

Thread: Save for i7 or stick with q6600?

  1. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,244
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    43 times in 41 posts

    Re: Save for i7 or stick with q6600?

    Stick to Q6600 cheaper imho.
    Deo Adjuvante non Timendum

  2. #18
    Gentoo Ricer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    11,048
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    944 times in 704 posts
    • aidanjt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Strix Z370-G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-8700K
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB Corsiar LPX 3000C15
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 960 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0
      • PSU:
      • EVGA G3 750W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define C Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus MG279Q
      • Internet:
      • 240mbps Virgin Cable

    Re: Save for i7 or stick with q6600?

    Quote Originally Posted by Saracen View Post
    But, according to Scott Byers (Principal Scientist at Adobe) Photoshop is a memory-bandwidth bound app. Part of the reason for that is that some people use VERY large files, and they aren't going to fit in memory. And even if they do, as soon as you start working on them, you're going to be creating layers etc and you'll rapidly need several times the size of the file which, if you're working with GB-sized files, is a serious demand.
    GB sized images?.. Are they using the Moon as a billboard these days?
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    ...every time Creative bring out a new card range their advertising makes it sound like they have discovered a way to insert a thousand Chuck Norris super dwarfs in your ears...

  3. #19
    Admin (Ret'd)
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,481
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    3,208 times in 2,281 posts

    Re: Save for i7 or stick with q6600?

    Quote Originally Posted by aidanjt View Post
    GB sized images?.. Are they using the Moon as a billboard these days?
    As I said, depends what you're doing.

    Adobe's definitions :-

    Small files = <50MB
    Medium = 50MB up to about 200MB
    Interesting = 200MB up to about 500MB
    Large = 1GB
    Super large = 2GB.

    I have a flatbed scanner that does 6400 x 6400 dpi (interpolated), 36-bit and is A3. Not A4, A3. And it's an old device, and low-res by today's standards, as it's only 800 x 600 optical. But even that produces some respectably whopping files.

    If you're talking about large drum scanners .....


  4. #20
    Gentoo Ricer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    11,048
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    944 times in 704 posts
    • aidanjt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Strix Z370-G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-8700K
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB Corsiar LPX 3000C15
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 960 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0
      • PSU:
      • EVGA G3 750W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define C Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus MG279Q
      • Internet:
      • 240mbps Virgin Cable

    Re: Save for i7 or stick with q6600?

    Quote Originally Posted by Saracen View Post
    As I said, depends what you're doing.

    Adobe's definitions :-

    Small files = <50MB
    Medium = 50MB up to about 200MB
    Interesting = 200MB up to about 500MB
    Large = 1GB
    Super large = 2GB.

    I have a flatbed scanner that does 6400 x 6400 dpi (interpolated), 36-bit and is A3. Not A4, A3. And it's an old device, and low-res by today's standards, as it's only 800 x 600 optical. But even that produces some respectably whopping files.

    If you're talking about large drum scanners .....



    Still, that's only 120MB odd in raw format, and lossless image compression has come a fair way since.

    I suppose I'm thinking too much in terms of technology, and what's needed, rather than what e-artists perfer.

    I can just imagine it now, e-peni contests about who made the bigger multi-GB image file.
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    ...every time Creative bring out a new card range their advertising makes it sound like they have discovered a way to insert a thousand Chuck Norris super dwarfs in your ears...

  5. #21
    Folding Flunkie Webby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Wiltshire
    Posts
    2,323
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    245 times in 229 posts
    • Webby's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte G33M-DS2R, Swiftech MCW30 Northbridge Cooler
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 @ 3.5GHz, Cooling D-Tek Fuzion V2
      • Memory:
      • 2GB OCZ Flex DDR2 PC2-9200 5-5-5-15 @ 1000MHz 4-4-4-12
      • Storage:
      • 2x 250GB WD SataII
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire HD4870 512MB, Cooling Swiftech MCW60
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520w
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Tremjin TJ06 - Modded for Water Cooling Goodness
      • Operating System:
      • Windows XP Pro SP3
      • Monitor(s):
      • 22" Widescreen Cibox C2201 (with DVI input)
      • Internet:
      • 8Mb/s ADSL

    Re: Save for i7 or stick with q6600?

    A lot of file size in Photoshop comes from layers for example my GF (illustrator) will start off with a hand drawn piece of work scan it in at ~600-1200dpi (max resolutions of ~20000*15000) and then work from there. The thing is that she probably will have 20-30 layers (depending on the piece) by the end so file sizes get big real fast. The final image will be "relatively" small once all the layers have been flattened and the DPI/resolution reduced for printing.

  6. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    129
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 2 posts

    Re: Save for i7 or stick with q6600?

    Not knowing what you do with your PC and how much you can afford to spend, I'll tell you my thoughts.

    As a general rule to stop me wasting money on my PC for incremental gains, I upgrade the core of my system (Mobo+CPU+RAM) every three years, sticking to the base speed of a high-end line CPU, with a fairly expensive mobo. 12-18 mths after that I'd purchase a newer CPU. Graphics cards and HDD are upgraded on a needs be basis, but usually every 2 yrs.

    My previous core system components are handed down to my dad.

    I'll upgrade to the i7 920. Right now I'm running a dual-core Opteron 170 @ 2.6, 2GB RAM on an nForce 4 SLI mobo. I don't see upgrading to anything less as worth it, especially since I'll only sell the core components of an AthlonXP 2100 system now.

    Right now, the gains of a 920 over a Q6600, especially if OC'd will be quite small, and IMHO money best spent elsewhere or saved. But, if you're looking for future potential and the possibility to drop in a better cpu later on, then get the 920.

  7. #23
    RIX
    RIX is offline
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    ESSEX
    Posts
    86
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • RIX's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI BIG BANG XPOWER X58
      • CPU:
      • CORE I7 920 @ 4GHZ - WATERCOOLED
      • Memory:
      • OCZ REAPER 12GB 1866MHZ TRI CHANNEL
      • Storage:
      • 3x SAMSUNG SPINPOINT 500GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI GTX 570 sli
      • PSU:
      • OCZ 1000W
      • Case:
      • ANTEC SKELETON
      • Operating System:
      • WINDOWS 7 PREMIUM 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 3x SAMSUNG SM2433BW 24"
      • Internet:
      • O2 BROADBAND MAX

    Re: Save for i7 or stick with q6600?

    I'm in the same situation, i'v got a maximus formula (x38) + q6600 (3.6 air) + 4gb 1066 ram in an antec p182. And after seeing what the core i7 can do i want one.

    So what i'm doing is moving everything to a zalman home theatre case (inc the HDDs) because i want a media pc aswell.

    Then i will start again with an x58 set up, i'v already got the mobo (asus p6T deluxe) need to wait for pay day to get the rest lol. The price isnt bad compared to a high end x48 setup, I got my p6T for &#163;237 delivered from specialtech.



    Signature...................................................................

  8. #24
    Jay
    Jay is offline
    Gentlemen.. we're history Jay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Jita
    Posts
    8,365
    Thanks
    304
    Thanked
    568 times in 409 posts

    Re: Save for i7 or stick with q6600?

    RIX you must be nuts!
    □ΞVΞ□

  9. #25
    RIX
    RIX is offline
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    ESSEX
    Posts
    86
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • RIX's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI BIG BANG XPOWER X58
      • CPU:
      • CORE I7 920 @ 4GHZ - WATERCOOLED
      • Memory:
      • OCZ REAPER 12GB 1866MHZ TRI CHANNEL
      • Storage:
      • 3x SAMSUNG SPINPOINT 500GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI GTX 570 sli
      • PSU:
      • OCZ 1000W
      • Case:
      • ANTEC SKELETON
      • Operating System:
      • WINDOWS 7 PREMIUM 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 3x SAMSUNG SM2433BW 24"
      • Internet:
      • O2 BROADBAND MAX

    Re: Save for i7 or stick with q6600?

    Maybe but alot of my mates are getting HTPCs, so instead of building a chep one might aswell use the old stuff lol.


    Signature...................................................................

  10. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Carlisle
    Posts
    4,121
    Thanks
    504
    Thanked
    368 times in 278 posts
    • matty-hodgson's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit IP35 Dark Raider
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ 4GHz (59'C Under a TRUE Black)
      • Memory:
      • 4GB OCZ DDR2 890MHz (5-4-4-15)
      • Storage:
      • Intel 80GB - Games. Intel 80GB - OS. 1TB Samsung - Storage.
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVIDIA Zotac GTX 275: 728 Core, 1614 Shader, 1340 Memory
      • PSU:
      • Enermax MODU82+ 625w
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung SM2343BW (2048x1152)
      • Internet:
      • Smallworld 4Mbps

    Re: Save for i7 or stick with q6600?

    Quote Originally Posted by RIX View Post
    Maybe but alot of my mates are getting HTPCs, so instead of building a chep one might aswell use the old stuff lol.
    so basically you want to be able to wave it at them?

    "mine's bigger and better than yours, ner ner na nerr nerr"

  11. #27
    RIX
    RIX is offline
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    ESSEX
    Posts
    86
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • RIX's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI BIG BANG XPOWER X58
      • CPU:
      • CORE I7 920 @ 4GHZ - WATERCOOLED
      • Memory:
      • OCZ REAPER 12GB 1866MHZ TRI CHANNEL
      • Storage:
      • 3x SAMSUNG SPINPOINT 500GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI GTX 570 sli
      • PSU:
      • OCZ 1000W
      • Case:
      • ANTEC SKELETON
      • Operating System:
      • WINDOWS 7 PREMIUM 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 3x SAMSUNG SM2433BW 24"
      • Internet:
      • O2 BROADBAND MAX

    Re: Save for i7 or stick with q6600?

    Quote Originally Posted by matty-hodgson View Post
    so basically you want to be able to wave it at them?

    "mine's bigger and better than yours, ner ner na nerr nerr"
    Yep thats it, but i want an sli set up and from the results i'v seen X58 is alot better than the 780/790 boards


    Signature...................................................................

  12. #28
    Admin (Ret'd)
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,481
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    3,208 times in 2,281 posts

    Re: Save for i7 or stick with q6600?

    Quote Originally Posted by aidanjt View Post


    Still, that's only 120MB odd in raw format, and lossless image compression has come a fair way since.

    I suppose I'm thinking too much in terms of technology, and what's needed, rather than what e-artists perfer.

    I can just imagine it now, e-peni contests about who made the bigger multi-GB image file.
    Yup, it's about 120MB ....per square inch.

    But if it's A3, it's up to about 17.5 x 11.5 inches, so you've got >200 of those square inches.

    Or scan a 6x6cm medium format slide at 6400 dpi 48-bit using a slide scanner. What size then? You're up into what Adboe refer to as "interesting" and pretty close to Large.

  13. #29
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    4
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Save for i7 or stick with q6600?

    Quote Originally Posted by RIX View Post
    I'm in the same situation, i'v got a maximus formula (x38) + q6600 (3.6 air) + 4gb 1066 ram in an antec p182. And after seeing what the core i7 can do i want one.

    So what i'm doing is moving everything to a zalman home theatre case (inc the HDDs) because i want a media pc aswell.

    Then i will start again with an x58 set up, i'v already got the mobo (asus p6T deluxe) need to wait for pay day to get the rest lol. The price isnt bad compared to a high end x48 setup, I got my p6T for £237 delivered from specialtech.
    I was thinking of doing the same, I have a E6400 on water cooling, a IP35 Pro, and 4gb of ram, I was going to put that in a media centre case but I quickly realised with a full sized motherboard a media centre case will just be a normal computer case on its side and with air cooling wont be that quiet.

    So instead I bought a MATX mobo, a cheap energy efficient AMD chip, Antec Fusion case etc, everything excluding the HDDs for £220! The same price as a I7 motherboard.

    This way I can build the media centre now, and upgrade to I7 in a few weeks/months hopefully when its cheaper, I reckon I can get the Mobo, Ram, and CPU for £515 hopefully.

  14. #30
    >:( magneticman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    N. London
    Posts
    735
    Thanks
    60
    Thanked
    17 times in 13 posts
    • magneticman's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P6T Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 920 @ 3.5ghz
      • Memory:
      • 3x2gb Corsair Dominator 1600mhz
      • Storage:
      • 1TB F1 + 2TB F3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus GTX 560Ti DirectCU II
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX750W
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC-V2110
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2408WFP
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity

    Re: Save for i7 or stick with q6600?

    if i scan an image into my scanner at 1200 dpi, add a couple of layers of retouching, the file size rapidly heads towards 1gb.

    even 48-bit images/raw photos start to eat up space..

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. how to remove file size limit in 8gb corsair usb stick
    By jeffel in forum Corsair.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 21-01-2010, 05:05 PM
  2. Hauppauge WinTV NOVA-T USB Stick - Remote Control
    By dankellys in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 18-12-2007, 10:35 AM
  3. USB memory stick recommendation...
    By retroborg in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 12-09-2007, 12:54 PM
  4. fp1901 Power save
    By ikonia in forum Graphics Cards
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27-09-2004, 09:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •