Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 27 of 27

Thread: Comments on Ultimate office based machine?

  1. #17
    Senior Member this_is_gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,854
    Thanks
    175
    Thanked
    254 times in 216 posts

    Re: Comments on Ultimate office based machine?

    You're probably right regarding 12GB being faster than 6GB, but there's a big difference between 8GB and 4GB, as I had a direct comparison between my old home PC and my old work PC. Very similar specs other than the RAM, and other than occasional gaming at home, similar usage.

    I agree that with decent SSDs the advantage of SuperFetch is nullified.

  2. #18
    YUKIKAZE arthurleung's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    3,280
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    88 times in 83 posts
    • arthurleung's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5E (Rampage Formula 0902)
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Quad Q9550 3.6Ghz 1.2V
      • Memory:
      • A-Data DDR2-800 2x2GB CL4
      • Storage:
      • 4x1TB WD1000FYPS @ RAID5 3Ware 9500S-8 / 3x 1TB Samsung Ecogreen F2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GeCube HD4870 512MB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair VX450
      • Case:
      • Antec P180
      • Operating System:
      • Windows Server 2008 Standard
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell Ultrasharp 2709W + 2001FP
      • Internet:
      • Be*Unlimited 20Mbps

    Re: Comments on Ultimate office based machine?

    Quote Originally Posted by this_is_gav View Post
    You're probably right regarding 12GB being faster than 6GB, but there's a big difference between 8GB and 4GB, as I had a direct comparison between my old home PC and my old work PC. Very similar specs other than the RAM, and other than occasional gaming at home, similar usage.

    I agree that with decent SSDs the advantage of SuperFetch is nullified.
    4GB vs 8GB will depends heavily on if you're on AMD or Intel.
    With AMD's IMC (or Intel i7), putting 4(6) sticks have no performance impact compared to 2 sticks.

    I tried sticking 8GB in my C2Q on a 965 board, which caused my max overclock to drop by 10% and memory bandwidth took a nosedive. Overall system performance dropped by about 20% (measured by x264 encoder).

    Will do some testing with 8GB on my "new" X38 board when I have time, exam is coming up :S.
    Workstation 1: Intel i7 950 @ 3.8Ghz / X58 / 12GB DDR3-1600 / HD4870 512MB / Antec P180
    Workstation 2: Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.6Ghz / X38 / 4GB DDR2-800 / 8400GS 512MB / Open Air
    Workstation 3: Intel Xeon X3350 @ 3.2Ghz / P35 / 4GB DDR2-800 / HD4770 512MB / Shuttle SP35P2
    HTPC: AMD Athlon X4 620 @ 2.6Ghz / 780G / 4GB DDR2-1000 / Antec Mini P180 White
    Mobile Workstation: Intel C2D T8300 @ 2.4Ghz / GM965 / 3GB DDR2-667 / DELL Inspiron 1525 / 6+6+9 Cell Battery

    Display (Monitor): DELL Ultrasharp 2709W + DELL Ultrasharp 2001FP
    Display (Projector): Epson TW-3500 1080p
    Speakers: Creative Megaworks THX550 5.1
    Headphones: Etymotic hf2 / Ultimate Ears Triple.fi 10 Pro

    Storage: 8x2TB Hitachi @ DELL PERC 6/i RAID6 / 13TB Non-RAID Across 12 HDDs
    Consoles: PS3 Slim 120GB / Xbox 360 Arcade 20GB / PS2

  3. #19
    Senior Member this_is_gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,854
    Thanks
    175
    Thanked
    254 times in 216 posts

    Re: Comments on Ultimate office based machine?

    Quote Originally Posted by arthurleung View Post
    4GB vs 8GB will depends heavily on if you're on AMD or Intel.
    With AMD's IMC (or Intel i7), putting 4(6) sticks have no performance impact compared to 2 sticks.
    I was still talking about SuperFetch, not overclocking potential. I thought you were too? :\

  4. #20
    YUKIKAZE arthurleung's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    3,280
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    88 times in 83 posts
    • arthurleung's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5E (Rampage Formula 0902)
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Quad Q9550 3.6Ghz 1.2V
      • Memory:
      • A-Data DDR2-800 2x2GB CL4
      • Storage:
      • 4x1TB WD1000FYPS @ RAID5 3Ware 9500S-8 / 3x 1TB Samsung Ecogreen F2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GeCube HD4870 512MB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair VX450
      • Case:
      • Antec P180
      • Operating System:
      • Windows Server 2008 Standard
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell Ultrasharp 2709W + 2001FP
      • Internet:
      • Be*Unlimited 20Mbps

    Re: Comments on Ultimate office based machine?

    Quote Originally Posted by this_is_gav View Post
    I was still talking about SuperFetch, not overclocking potential. I thought you were too? :\
    Well, you was talking about 4G vs 8G ram (Certainly not a configuration related to i7) and hence I take into account of overall system performance change due to 4G->8G, and SuperFetch won't help in that regards.
    Workstation 1: Intel i7 950 @ 3.8Ghz / X58 / 12GB DDR3-1600 / HD4870 512MB / Antec P180
    Workstation 2: Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.6Ghz / X38 / 4GB DDR2-800 / 8400GS 512MB / Open Air
    Workstation 3: Intel Xeon X3350 @ 3.2Ghz / P35 / 4GB DDR2-800 / HD4770 512MB / Shuttle SP35P2
    HTPC: AMD Athlon X4 620 @ 2.6Ghz / 780G / 4GB DDR2-1000 / Antec Mini P180 White
    Mobile Workstation: Intel C2D T8300 @ 2.4Ghz / GM965 / 3GB DDR2-667 / DELL Inspiron 1525 / 6+6+9 Cell Battery

    Display (Monitor): DELL Ultrasharp 2709W + DELL Ultrasharp 2001FP
    Display (Projector): Epson TW-3500 1080p
    Speakers: Creative Megaworks THX550 5.1
    Headphones: Etymotic hf2 / Ultimate Ears Triple.fi 10 Pro

    Storage: 8x2TB Hitachi @ DELL PERC 6/i RAID6 / 13TB Non-RAID Across 12 HDDs
    Consoles: PS3 Slim 120GB / Xbox 360 Arcade 20GB / PS2

  5. #21
    Senior Member this_is_gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,854
    Thanks
    175
    Thanked
    254 times in 216 posts

    Re: Comments on Ultimate office based machine?

    Quote Originally Posted by arthurleung View Post
    Well, you was talking about 4G vs 8G ram (Certainly not a configuration related to i7) and hence I take into account of overall system performance change due to 4G->8G, and SuperFetch won't help in that regards.
    It could have been i7 quite easily - I was on dual-channel for a while waiting for a RAM RMA, but nope, that was Q6600 systems based on X38. How won't 4GB to 8GB yield more performance? It won't make an encode any quicker, but many things loading will be doing so faster. My own Q6600 at home wouldn't go above 3.0GHz, regardless of how many sticks or channels were being used.

  6. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    273
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • Badbonji's system
      • Motherboard:
      • GIGABYTE G1.Sniper M3
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 3770k 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 16GB TeamElite 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • 256GB M4 SSD + 150GB Raptor
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 980
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850+ Rev. 2
      • Case:
      • Antec 1200
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 24" 1920x1200 + LG 32" 1080P TV
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 2 76/19Mbps

    Re: Comments on Ultimate office based machine?

    Quote Originally Posted by this_is_gav View Post
    It could have been i7 quite easily - I was on dual-channel for a while waiting for a RAM RMA, but nope, that was Q6600 systems based on X38. How won't 4GB to 8GB yield more performance? It won't make an encode any quicker, but many things loading will be doing so faster. My own Q6600 at home wouldn't go above 3.0GHz, regardless of how many sticks or channels were being used.
    It all depends how much memory you use. It doesn't increase bandwitdh whatsoever, and can make overclocks unstable, putting more stress on the memory controller.

  7. #23
    Senior Member this_is_gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,854
    Thanks
    175
    Thanked
    254 times in 216 posts

    Re: Comments on Ultimate office based machine?

    You didn't read all of that post, did you?

  8. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    273
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • Badbonji's system
      • Motherboard:
      • GIGABYTE G1.Sniper M3
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 3770k 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 16GB TeamElite 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • 256GB M4 SSD + 150GB Raptor
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 980
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850+ Rev. 2
      • Case:
      • Antec 1200
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 24" 1920x1200 + LG 32" 1080P TV
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 2 76/19Mbps

    Re: Comments on Ultimate office based machine?

    Quote Originally Posted by this_is_gav View Post
    You didn't read all of that post, did you?
    Well it doesn't make anything load faster unless the page file needs to be used, and if you do not use all of 6Gb then the page file will be barely touched. Opening a programme is nearly always limited by the access time of the hard drive, and how fast it is.

  9. #25
    Senior Member this_is_gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,854
    Thanks
    175
    Thanked
    254 times in 216 posts

    Re: Comments on Ultimate office based machine?

    Quote Originally Posted by Badbonji View Post
    Well it doesn't make anything load faster unless the page file needs to be used.
    Wrong way around. It is only slower when things need moved out to the page file. I think you're getting SuperFetch and ReadyBoost mixed up.

    Things like Photoshop open about 5-10 times faster if the majority of its components are prefetched rather than loaded directly from the hard drive on demand. Not as quick as if it were all in the memory, but a damn sight faster than if none of it was.

  10. #26
    YUKIKAZE arthurleung's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    3,280
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    88 times in 83 posts
    • arthurleung's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5E (Rampage Formula 0902)
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Quad Q9550 3.6Ghz 1.2V
      • Memory:
      • A-Data DDR2-800 2x2GB CL4
      • Storage:
      • 4x1TB WD1000FYPS @ RAID5 3Ware 9500S-8 / 3x 1TB Samsung Ecogreen F2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GeCube HD4870 512MB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair VX450
      • Case:
      • Antec P180
      • Operating System:
      • Windows Server 2008 Standard
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell Ultrasharp 2709W + 2001FP
      • Internet:
      • Be*Unlimited 20Mbps

    Re: Comments on Ultimate office based machine?

    Quote Originally Posted by this_is_gav View Post
    Wrong way around. It is only slower when things need moved out to the page file. I think you're getting SuperFetch and ReadyBoost mixed up.

    Things like Photoshop open about 5-10 times faster if the majority of its components are prefetched rather than loaded directly from the hard drive on demand. Not as quick as if it were all in the memory, but a damn sight faster than if none of it was.
    Perhaps if you have that amount of memory, you would be smart enough to have photoshop loaded on startup hence saving you the trouble of even opening it. Taking "pre-fetching" to a new level
    Workstation 1: Intel i7 950 @ 3.8Ghz / X58 / 12GB DDR3-1600 / HD4870 512MB / Antec P180
    Workstation 2: Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.6Ghz / X38 / 4GB DDR2-800 / 8400GS 512MB / Open Air
    Workstation 3: Intel Xeon X3350 @ 3.2Ghz / P35 / 4GB DDR2-800 / HD4770 512MB / Shuttle SP35P2
    HTPC: AMD Athlon X4 620 @ 2.6Ghz / 780G / 4GB DDR2-1000 / Antec Mini P180 White
    Mobile Workstation: Intel C2D T8300 @ 2.4Ghz / GM965 / 3GB DDR2-667 / DELL Inspiron 1525 / 6+6+9 Cell Battery

    Display (Monitor): DELL Ultrasharp 2709W + DELL Ultrasharp 2001FP
    Display (Projector): Epson TW-3500 1080p
    Speakers: Creative Megaworks THX550 5.1
    Headphones: Etymotic hf2 / Ultimate Ears Triple.fi 10 Pro

    Storage: 8x2TB Hitachi @ DELL PERC 6/i RAID6 / 13TB Non-RAID Across 12 HDDs
    Consoles: PS3 Slim 120GB / Xbox 360 Arcade 20GB / PS2

  11. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    273
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • Badbonji's system
      • Motherboard:
      • GIGABYTE G1.Sniper M3
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 3770k 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 16GB TeamElite 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • 256GB M4 SSD + 150GB Raptor
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 980
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850+ Rev. 2
      • Case:
      • Antec 1200
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 24" 1920x1200 + LG 32" 1080P TV
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 2 76/19Mbps

    Re: Comments on Ultimate office based machine?

    Quote Originally Posted by this_is_gav View Post
    Wrong way around. It is only slower when things need moved out to the page file. I think you're getting SuperFetch and ReadyBoost mixed up.

    Things like Photoshop open about 5-10 times faster if the majority of its components are prefetched rather than loaded directly from the hard drive on demand. Not as quick as if it were all in the memory, but a damn sight faster than if none of it was.
    I meant that there is little difference between 4gb and 8gb unless the page file is used when opening large applications with 4gb memory.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Office Ultimate 2007 - £38.95
    By StevenF in forum Software
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 05-05-2008, 05:10 PM
  2. MS Office Ultimate for under £40
    By -iceblade^ in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04-05-2008, 02:10 PM
  3. Microsoft 2007 Ultimate £38.95 - Students!!
    By Mnet_Gaming in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 19-09-2007, 10:29 PM
  4. Ultimate Machine or Price Tag?
    By vicar in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-05-2006, 05:16 PM
  5. 102 RON fuel at the pumps hits UK shores...
    By Lowe in forum Automotive
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 26-04-2006, 08:40 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •