Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Zalman ZM80C-HP performance?

  1. #1
    DsW
    DsW is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    292
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Zalman ZM80C-HP performance?

    Right guys,

    Anyone got experience of the performance of the latest Zalman VGA cooler (or the ZM80A-HP)?

    I've recently seen some overheating problems in the 'Call of Duty' demo (using catalyst 3.7), and I was thinking of upgrading from the stock fan on my 9700np.

    Apart from the advantages of silence - does the ZM80C (or A) provide better cooling than the stock fan?

    The ZM80C can also be fitted with a silent fan, which is another option I suppose.

    cheers,
    dave

  2. #2
    Senior Member SilentDeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    4,745
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    16 times in 11 posts
    i had the zm80ahp, its not worth the money imo, the vantec iceberq4 should be good enuf and half the price.

    im using a vantec iceberq1 on my 9700np temporaly, and the fan on this pushes about half the air and it cools fine, both iirc are silent.

    also consider underclocking ur gfx card, for most gaems atm it wont make any differnce, and makes the most in dx9 games. on mine max payne 2 with everything on max, 6x aa 16x af, in 1600*1200 still gets 40fps at 200 core and 270 mem, my card is capable of 400 core and 313.5 mem...

  3. #3
    In a place called VERTIGO CrapshoT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Pushing his fingers into his eyes
    Posts
    1,340
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    i put one of these on my rad 9700 and it only lasted a week before i put the standard heatsink back on if your not overclocking your card and want a silent pc it would be ok but i found it a bit crap as a cooler i had to make a bracket and aim a blowing fan on to it cos i was o/cing my card
    Farts are like children.....You always love you're Own.!!!
    Wise Men learn from Other people's mistake's...Fool's learn from their OWN.!!!

  4. #4
    Junior Senior Member Aaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    1,516
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    I've got the original version on my GeForce 4 Ti4600.

    The cooling power of the heatsink was roughly equivelent to that of the original heatsink and fan, but raised my case temperature up several degrees.

    I guess if it was used in conjunction with a fan it would provide superior cooling but I was more interested in silence.

  5. #5
    Never try, never fail!
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    853
    Thanks
    36
    Thanked
    19 times in 17 posts
    my colleague sat next to me has one in his home system...well the gold coloured one anyway. He has his card slighlty oc'd with no fan. As long as you have a decent case/airflow then it will do the job just fine. His in in a Lian-li pc65 with only 3 of the 4 case fans on. Is a better option than listening to the whine of the stock radeon coolers and i was llloking at getting one myself at some point..

  6. #6
    Senior Member SilentDeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    4,745
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    16 times in 11 posts
    CrapshoT, u dont need a bracket, the fan can be rested on the back heatsink, on of the top of both, itsgoosd idea not ot have fan on front cos that would counter the heatpipe.

    the max anmount of heat output by gfx card is always same unless u overclock it, if ur case temp rised it means that the zalman just had better contact with teh care, and took away more heat, so ur core was probly running about 10*c cooler. the cooling power of this heatsink is imo about the same as the original without using a fan on it, with a fan, the zalman is capable of a lot more heat. a silent fan (80mm) would cost about £5, and would make this cooler a LOT better than the stock cooler due to huuuuuuge airflow, and huuge surface area. cards atm dont need this much cooling power though, and an iceberq4 would be just as good and ull be overclock just as far with it (these are silent, and 1/2 price)

  7. #7
    DsW
    DsW is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    292
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Thanks for your replies.

    I think I'll go with the Iceberg4.

    cheers,
    dave

  8. #8
    In a place called VERTIGO CrapshoT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Pushing his fingers into his eyes
    Posts
    1,340
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    thanks for the info |SilentDeath| these Iceberg4s will fit straight on to a rad 9700 as well do they ?
    Farts are like children.....You always love you're Own.!!!
    Wise Men learn from Other people's mistake's...Fool's learn from their OWN.!!!

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Midlands
    Posts
    8,629
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked
    260 times in 181 posts
    Apparently, with the optional fan, it does a top job. I've seen a good few reviews, and most reccomend it, but only with the fan.

    Still, both of them will set you back about £35-£40 the pair, so it may be a bit pricy.

    Works though, with the fan.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •