Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Quick Compact Camera

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    213
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Quick Compact Camera

    Does anyone know of a decent compact camera with decent picture quality and most importantly, fast in taking snaps. The problem I have is we are use to the instantaneous nature of the DSLR and like something similar for ad-hoc picture taking.

    We have an old camera which has delays of about a second or so between pressing the button and taking the image. Popped into Jessops and the gentleman suggested the Canon Ixus 60. Anyone with other recs for me to research into?

  2. #2
    Senior Member JPreston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,667
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    124 times in 74 posts
    Think they are all pretty rubbish TBH, certainly compared to a proper SLR.

    I vaguely remember a newspaper review of the Sony W30 that costs about £140 and pushes all the compact camera buttons, so to speak. For £140, can't really go wrong I suppose.

    Actually just seen amazon have it for £127!

  3. #3
    I need a coffee jamena's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,065
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    I have an old sony DSC-P8 and the main reason(s) it is slow is because it takes time to auto-focus and to decide whether or not to turn on the flash etc. If I set it's focal distance (e.g. 1m at parties) and tell it to use the flash every time then it takes the shots (I use a low-level of the flash to avoid whiting out the subjects mostly, depending on the light level) almost instantly. It's all a case of working out a way around the limitations.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,182
    Thanks
    133
    Thanked
    46 times in 45 posts
    Have a look at some of the Canon ones . I use a xsus 500 and it is very good quality . It all depends how much your budget is , anything around 5 or 6 mega-pixals , if it is a good brand will give good results.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    213
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Budgetry constraints around 200. But if there is a very good one for 300 then I go for it. Main thing is something close in speed to a DSLR - not expecting DSLR quick but not slow such that the subject/view/image composition deciedes to move before the picture is taken.

  6. #6
    780 nanometres redlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    East Herts
    Posts
    859
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    26 times in 19 posts
    • redlight's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit QuadGT
      • CPU:
      • Core 2 Quad 6600@3.1
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Geil PC6400
      • Storage:
      • 2x250GB Samsung 400GB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Leadtek 8800GTS 640MB
      • PSU:
      • Tagan 580w
      • Case:
      • Gigabyte Aurora
      • Monitor(s):
      • Fujitsu Siemens 22" + 42" plasma
      • Internet:
      • 2MB Tiscali
    How about this £136 from PCworld. It has prety good reviews.

    http://www.fujifilm.co.uk/digital/ca...x.php?&flash=9

  7. #7
    Senior Member JPreston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,667
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    124 times in 74 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by redlight View Post
    How about this £136 from PCworld. It has prety good reviews.

    http://www.fujifilm.co.uk/digital/ca...x.php?&flash=9
    Yo I'm asking about that vs the 6500fd (next one up) in another thread. I think that if the extra £90 isn't a problem the 6500 is the one to go for, cos of the twisty manual zoom making iit feel like a proper grown-up camera.

  8. #8
    780 nanometres redlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    East Herts
    Posts
    859
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    26 times in 19 posts
    • redlight's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit QuadGT
      • CPU:
      • Core 2 Quad 6600@3.1
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Geil PC6400
      • Storage:
      • 2x250GB Samsung 400GB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Leadtek 8800GTS 640MB
      • PSU:
      • Tagan 580w
      • Case:
      • Gigabyte Aurora
      • Monitor(s):
      • Fujitsu Siemens 22" + 42" plasma
      • Internet:
      • 2MB Tiscali
    Quote Originally Posted by JPreston View Post
    Yo I'm asking about that vs the 6500fd (next one up) in another thread. I think that if the extra £90 isn't a problem the 6500 is the one to go for, cos of the twisty manual zoom making iit feel like a proper grown-up camera.
    I agree the 6500. I was thinking of his budget.

  9. #9
    not posting kempez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Basingstoke
    Posts
    3,204
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I have the Ricoh Caplio R5 and it's a great camera when you consider it's 1/2 the price of an SLR without the need for extra lenses etc

    Still £200ish tho
    Check my project <<| Black3D |>>
    Quote Originally Posted by hexah
    Games are developed by teams of talented people and sometimes electronic arts

  10. #10
    Seething Cauldron of Hatred TheAnimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    17,168
    Thanks
    803
    Thanked
    2,152 times in 1,408 posts
    I love my sony T-7!

    I really really am just smitten with it.

    Its great. Ultra small, good battery life, very swift on to take the picture (i think warm up time is 1.6seconds, who cares, it takes longer to focus than anything else!)

    Really couldn't recomend it enough, can send u some clubbing photos, pubbing photos, macro photos, or anything.

    Its been superseeded by the t-10, which is bigger but has better performance in low light (apparently).

    I would recomend the t-7, even thou its old, it really is worth all the hype it got.
    throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)

  11. #11
    Syd
    Syd is offline
    Hanging on the Edge Syd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    1,700
    Thanks
    86
    Thanked
    44 times in 38 posts
    • Syd's system
      • Motherboard:
      • EVGA 760 Classified / X570S Tomahawk / gigabyte gaming 7 1150
      • CPU:
      • I7 920@3.8 / 5800X / 4790k
      • Memory:
      • 18GB Dominator DDR3 1600 / 32GB Crucial 3600 / 16GB GSill
      • Storage:
      • 980pro Nvme / Sam840's/ Sam SM951
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 690GTX on Water/ 1080ti
      • PSU:
      • AX860/1250w Seasonic
      • Case:
      • TJ07 / PCV700
      • Operating System:
      • 10 64/ 10 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • NEC 30” 3090 + ASUS 27 144HZ 1440p IPS
      • Internet:
      • Sky Fibre pro
    I can comment on the Canon Ixus800IS. Now available for £200.
    Small, big monitor, near instant start up, good lens and Image Stabalisation - which is great for handheld shots either low light or at full tele.
    I've had it for about 9 months and it gets good use alongside my Nikon D80.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    213
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Thanks for all the feedback - will be googling and reading as many reviews of these as I can.

  13. #13
    Senior Member joshwa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sheffield, UK
    Posts
    4,856
    Thanks
    132
    Thanked
    67 times in 62 posts
    • joshwa's system
      • Motherboard:
      • PC Chips M577 AT/ATX
      • CPU:
      • AMD K6-2 500Mhz
      • Memory:
      • 128mb PC100 SDRAM
      • Storage:
      • 8GB Fujitsu
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 3dfx Voodoo 3 3000 AGP (16mb)
      • PSU:
      • ATX 500watt
      • Case:
      • Midi Tower AT
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 98 SE
      • Monitor(s):
      • 22" TFT Widescreen
    The Fuji F20 or F30 (F31, F40) Range is very good for the price (From around &#163;120 for the F20) and is very fast, with a "high-speed" mode that you can switch on as well - on the F10/11/30/31 definitely, (not checked the others in person) - I have recommended these to people in the past who have wanted a fast digital camera. The only downside is that whilst focusing and taking the photo is fast, write times can be a bit slow on the highest resolution, slowing down shot to shot time slightly.
    Last edited by joshwa; 13-02-2007 at 03:36 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. picking a new compact digital camera...
    By jamena in forum Photography
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 26-05-2006, 06:16 PM
  2. Cheap Compact camera
    By mark19632 in forum Photography
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 16-03-2006, 04:47 AM
  3. Compact Digital Camera - money no object
    By IBM in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-06-2004, 10:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •