Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 33 to 38 of 38

Thread: New possible drugs policy

  1. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    198
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    30 times in 23 posts
    • Consfearacy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock M3A790GXH/USB3
      • CPU:
      • AMD Phenom II x4 965 Quad Core OC @ 4.1Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 4 GB Kingston 1333MHz DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Corsair Force 3 60GB SSD/Western Digital 650GB Caviar Blue
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2 x Sapphire Radeon HD 5770 1GB Flex
      • PSU:
      • OCZ 600w Stealth XStream 2
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Storm Scout
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Iiyama Prolite B2409HDS
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity

    Re: New possible drugs policy

    Quote Originally Posted by format View Post
    Read my post again. I typed 'inane' not 'insane'.
    I stand corrected on this mistake, but I am not prepared to adjust my opinion.
    "If you don't live for something, you die for nothing"

  2. #34
    Senior Member Macman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    1,537
    Thanks
    203
    Thanked
    98 times in 81 posts
    • Macman's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Z170 Pro Gaming
      • CPU:
      • i9 9900K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 5TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia GeForce RTX2080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 650VS
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 11
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" Asus Predator

    Re: New possible drugs policy

    Quote Originally Posted by matty-hodgson View Post
    Yet more reason to legalise drugs. Much in the same way that cigarettes are taxed to pay for their effects, drugs could be taxed to pay for their adverse affects.
    But the outcome of said person smoking? to say someone taking Heroin/Cocaine/LSD etc has massive diffrences.

    Someone chain smoking, doesn't render them uncontrollable. However someone high on ectasy does, hence how I, nearly had my face slashed in town with a guy trying to take money from me. (Police were only few shops away).

    However, weed on the other hand I think should be legalised, as it CAN* serves a medical purpose on a wide scale or so I'm led to believe.

  3. #35
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Carlisle
    Posts
    4,121
    Thanks
    504
    Thanked
    368 times in 278 posts
    • matty-hodgson's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit IP35 Dark Raider
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ 4GHz (59'C Under a TRUE Black)
      • Memory:
      • 4GB OCZ DDR2 890MHz (5-4-4-15)
      • Storage:
      • Intel 80GB - Games. Intel 80GB - OS. 1TB Samsung - Storage.
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVIDIA Zotac GTX 275: 728 Core, 1614 Shader, 1340 Memory
      • PSU:
      • Enermax MODU82+ 625w
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung SM2343BW (2048x1152)
      • Internet:
      • Smallworld 4Mbps

    Re: New possible drugs policy

    Quote Originally Posted by Macman View Post
    Tbh... Drug Addict's should be tossed on an island and left to fend for themselves. Why should WE as tax payers have to be penalised for there health? Methadone etc.

    Drug Addict's break into peoples home/mug folk only to feed their habit, why should we tolerate it? If we defended ourselves, most likely we would be given a criminal record :/, imo the justice system in UK is an absolute joke.

    It really really needs to be reviewed to favour the victim.
    Yet more reason to legalise drugs. Much in the same way that cigarettes are taxed to pay for their effects, drugs could be taxed to pay for their adverse affects.

  4. #36
    hexus.zombeh! format's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Strath Uni, Glasgow
    Posts
    2,747
    Thanks
    510
    Thanked
    178 times in 130 posts
    • format's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit IP35 Pro
      • CPU:
      • Core2Duo E6750 @ 3.2ghz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB GSkill PC8000
      • Storage:
      • WD500GB+750GB F1 + 250GB external drive
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Geforce GTX260
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520w
      • Case:
      • Antec P182 + 3 x Nexus fans
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" DGM
      • Internet:
      • BeThere* Pro

    Re: New possible drugs policy

    Quote Originally Posted by Macman View Post
    But the outcome of said person smoking? to say someone taking Heroin/Cocaine/LSD etc has massive diffrences.

    Someone chain smoking, doesn't render them uncontrollable. However someone high on ectasy does, hence how I, nearly had my face slashed in town with a guy trying to take money from me. (Police were only few shops away).

    However, weed on the other hand I think should be legalised, as it CAN* serves a medical purpose on a wide scale or so I'm led to believe.
    The guy was high on ecstasy and tried to slash your face? I humbly submit that he had not been taking any ecstasy, or at least he hadn't been taking any good ecstasy. Most likely cut with some crap. The cutting of drugs with impure substances is by the way one of the dangerous by-products of our drugs legislation, and incidentally the reason why so many people die from 'drugs'. If it were legalised and controlled by the government, there would be far, far fewer overdoses and/or deaths from drugs because there would be no confusion about their contents.

    Anyone who has ever taken ecstasy will tell you slashing someone's face is that last thing they'd ever think of. More likely he had been drinking - which is behind a huge proportion of violent crimes all over the world. Not much outcry for that to be banned though.
    ~'Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity'~ Aldous Huxley




  5. #37
    HEXUS.Metal Knoxville's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Down In A Hole
    Posts
    9,388
    Thanks
    484
    Thanked
    442 times in 255 posts
    • Knoxville's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Intel X58
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 920
      • Memory:
      • 2GB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATi HD3450
      • PSU:
      • Generic
      • Case:
      • Cheap and nasty
      • Operating System:
      • Vista 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" LG LCD
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 20mb

    Re: New possible drugs policy

    There's no real argument to be had here, prohibition just doesn't work. Throwing more money and more man hours at the problem, and ignoring more documents that show there is a better way won't win the war on drugs or make your street any safer. Proposal's have been made to change policy, and papers written by experts on what SHOULD be done, but unfortunately the war's big buisiness, it's never going away no matter how fruitless the endeavour.

  6. #38
    Boooooom Barakka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    ...fixing it in post
    Posts
    1,361
    Thanks
    61
    Thanked
    127 times in 104 posts

    Re: New possible drugs policy

    Quote Originally Posted by Knoxville View Post
    There's no real argument to be had here, prohibition just doesn't work. Throwing more money and more man hours at the problem, and ignoring more documents that show there is a better way won't win the war on drugs or make your street any safer. Proposal's have been made to change policy, and papers written by experts on what SHOULD be done, but unfortunately the war's big buisiness, it's never going away no matter how fruitless the endeavour.
    Exactly, there are more people die from smoking every week than die from all the illegal drugs every year, but when Allen Carr approached the government years ago to tell them there is a way to stop people smoking easily they ignored him. And not only that no-one would publish his book out of fear !!

    We've had politicians and police heads, all been responsible for enforcing the drug policy, turn round and publicly say that prohibition doesn't work, and the response is "well that government did it wrong".

    An end to prohibition would enable us to educate people in the truth about drugs and get rid of some of the myths - like cannabis is harmless and even has health benefits for some people, when we'd be better making people aware of the dangers of using cannabis if they have any underlying mental health issues as that's when it IS bad...

    But more importantly it would get the drugs clean... that's the main reason people die from drugs, they don't know what they're using and what strength it is.

    Will never happen though... shame
    Quote Originally Posted by The Mock Turtle
    “Reeling and Writhing, of course, to begin with, and then the different branches of arithmetic -- Ambition, Distraction, Uglification, and Derision."
    System:Atari 2600 CPU:8-bit 6507 (1.19MHz) RAM:128 bytes Colours: 16 (4 on screen) Resolution: 192x160

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The "war" on drugs
    By Agent in forum Question Time
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 21-12-2009, 04:10 PM
  2. Implementing IT Policy
    By TiG in forum Software
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 24-07-2007, 05:25 PM
  3. Drugs and the Tories
    By DaBeeeenster in forum Question Time
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 28-10-2005, 05:33 PM
  4. Guns and Drugs
    By 1000cc in forum Question Time
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27-05-2005, 10:56 PM
  5. Poems...
    By Wiffle_BMXer in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-02-2004, 06:49 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •