Quite simply because what is acceptable and obvious for one person is not for another. I'm merely saying one cannot have an all-encompassing rule forcing loss of benefits because cases like these will come up. I'm sure we could have a debate between members here about what would be an acceptable job to do and what wouldn't. It's not clear-cut at all. Let's take Rave's example of working in Ann Summers. Now you may not have any qualms about working in Ann Summers but I bet you know people who would have. Where'd you stand on this?