How exactly are YOU more qualified, what makes your statements more correct than mine (apart fromarrogance of course )? I find it funny that you have the same perspective I do, to me you seem to know very little, the difference is I tend to be self depracating and have actually stated what my "qualifications" are re economics. As for determinism and logic what qualifications would I require before I was allowed to voice an opinion on them? And could you act a bit more maturely and actually point out my mistakes and why they are so rather than throwing around generalised belittling insults? How will I learn if you don't teach me?