Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Why replacement instead of refund?

  1. #1
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    18
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Exclamation Why replacement instead of refund?

    Hi,

    I recently RMA'd an item. The RMA number is 182879. I wanted to return it as it was unwanted and so returned it under the Distance Selling Regulations for a refund.

    I just checked the status of the RMA and it says in the "awaiting replacement/credit" field that a replacement is going to be sent.

    I specifically asked for a refund so I don't understand why its being processed as a replacement.

    If a replacement is sent I will most certainly reject delivery of the item.

    Could you please rectify this problem and refund me for this item.

    Thank you.
    Last edited by Vegeta; 30-05-2008 at 11:14 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,457
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked
    75 times in 71 posts

    Re: Why replacement instead of refund?

    The DSR states that the seller should give a reasonable time after receipt of the goods in which you can use the DSR to return an item. Most stores (that I know of) give 7 days (working, if the store works Saturdays, these count too) for the buyer to reject goods, were you within this time frame?

    If you were, then I am sure Scan will sort this out for you.

  3. #3
    Registered+ Adamb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    53
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked
    3 times in 2 posts
    • Adamb's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5KC iP35
      • CPU:
      • Intel Q6600
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Corsair XMS2 PC-6400 @CAS 5-12
      • Storage:
      • 500Gb Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 + 500Gb Samsung Spinpoint
      • Graphics card(s):
      • BFG 8800GTX
      • PSU:
      • 620W Corsair HX Modular
      • Case:
      • Antec 900
      • Monitor(s):
      • 22' LG L226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 8mb boo hoo :(

    Re: Why replacement instead of refund?

    Vegeta

    As per my colleague Ian's email, this RMA has been amended to a refund, this should be processed shortly

    Regards,

  4. #4
    Admin (Ret'd)
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,481
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    3,208 times in 2,281 posts

    Re: Why replacement instead of refund?

    Quote Originally Posted by vinnyT View Post
    The DSR states that the seller should give a reasonable time after receipt of the goods in which you can use the DSR to return an item. Most stores (that I know of) give 7 days (working, if the store works Saturdays, these count too) for the buyer to reject goods, were you within this time frame?
    Actually, that's a bit wrong in a couple of respects.

    Other consumer laws specify that the buyer has a reasonable time to reject goods, but in those cases, the elapse of a "reasonable time" is only one way in which you can accept goods, and therefore lose the right to reject. There are other ways.

    The DSR is very specific, and specifies exactly what the time periods are, though it can vary according to circumstances. There are certain bits of information the seller must provide to the buyer. If he does, that time period is exactly 7 working days, starting with the day after the consumer receives the goods. If that information is not provided, it is 7 working days starting from the day after it is provided, or a maximum of 3 months and 7 working days in the event that it never is provided, again starting the day after receipt of goods.

    Also, Saturdays do NOT count towards working days, which are defined as all days except Saturdays, Sundays or Bank Holidays. This is regardless of what days the seller works.

    Finally, and this point is a bit obscure, perhaps. You say the DSR gives a period within which you can use the DSR to return goods. That's not quite right. It defines a period within which you can use the DSR to cancel the contract. In general, it may amount to the same thing, but the buyer is not actually under any obligation whatever under the DSR to return the goods. He is merely under an obligation to take retain possession of them and take "reasonable care" of them, and "restore" the goods to the supplier. But "restore" can mean to allow collection. He might, however, be under an obligation to return them because of the contract, and/or might be under an obligation to pay the direct cost of collection if he doesn't return them, unless the goods can be rejected under some other contractual clause, including Sale of Goods Act rights, like satisfactory quality or fitness for purpose.

  5. Received thanks from:

    vinnyT (31-05-2008)

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,457
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked
    75 times in 71 posts

    Re: Why replacement instead of refund?

    Thanks for that elucidation (see I can talk lawer speak too (even if I don't know what I'm talking about)), at least I was right about scan sorting it out in a timely fashion.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. U2-UFO Project.
    By Clunk in forum Chassis and Mods
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 17-07-2007, 10:07 AM
  2. Replacement graphics card delivery
    By returnofjim in forum SCAN.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-12-2006, 11:55 AM
  3. Up to £100 Refund when betting on Spurs this Saturday
    By MagicFreebiesUK in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 22-08-2006, 07:58 AM
  4. replacement goods
    By barker967 in forum SCAN.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 15-08-2006, 06:59 PM
  5. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 19-02-2005, 06:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •