Read more.Overcoming technical hurdles, Seagate provides more storage space than you know what to do with.
Read more.Overcoming technical hurdles, Seagate provides more storage space than you know what to do with.
For a nice explanation of the 'efficiency' savings of 4k clusters see this article, which shows WD's solution to the legacy 512byte only aware OSen:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/2888
Oh no, I know exactly what to do with the space... provided these are compatible with my RAID cardOvercoming technical hurdles, Seagate provides more storage space than you know what to do with.
Yeah but its Seagate so...ya'know..pass.
It comes and goes, though.
I've got loads of Seagate drives, and the only ones that have ever let me down was when a mains power spike blew most of the machine, including physically blowing a chunk out of a chip on one (of four) of the drives. I also have loads of WD drives, but a friend won't touch 'em because he's had too many problems. Most manufacturers have been through a dodgy patch at some point. I guess you pay yer money and take yer chance.
Those drives sizes are pennies these days!Originally Posted by HEXUS
I wonder if anyone here knows ... can these 3TB drives be accessed as an external drive by WinXP 32bit?
- Another poster, from another forum.I'm commenting on an internet forum. Your facts hold no sway over me.
System as shown, plus: Microsoft Wireless mobile 4000 mouse and Logitech Illuminated keyboard.
Sennheiser RS160 wireless headphones. Creative Gigaworks T40 SII. My wife. My Hexus Trust
32bit OS is only capable of 2TB max. volume...
My Blog => http://adriank.org
Article seems to imply that it will work. The external factor shouldn't make a difference - and if it did, it would only be a positive change, since Seagate have full control over the interface and controller as compared to an internal disk.Thankfully, Seagate has this one covered too, by using its SmartAlign technology to ensure all data fits properly into the 4K sectors, even on Windows XP.
"In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."
It's not really the fact that it is a 32bit OS that is the limiting factor.
The limit is imposed by the MBR partition table through use of 512 sectors.
4294967296 total sectors (i.e. the 32bit), with 512 bytes per sector
so times them together giving a total max of 2199023255552 bytes, divide by 1024, and again, and again.
Et voila, 2048GiB, AKA 2TiB
However, increase the sector size to 4K, and you bump the max size greatly (16TiB)
Everything is slowly (very) moving to GPT, over MBR really...
However, XP32 will not be receiving official support for 4K sector drives...
Core 2 Quad Q9450 3.2GHz | Asus P5Q PRO Turbo | 4GB DDR2-800 | (2) 1TB Samsung F1 | Radeon HD 5850 | Windows 7 x64
Core 2 Duo E6400 | Abit IP35-E | 4GB DDR2-800 | 320GB Seagate 7200.10 | Radeon HD 4830 | Linux Mint 9
USB 2 on a drive this size = epic fail. I really don't understand why, as the first company with a 3TB drive on the market, they wouldn't sell the bare drive? Maybe it has something to do with the 2TB boot drive limits or something so people don't buy one, try to boot from it and then complain. But then why not just ask retailers to add a little note saying storage drive only or something?
They did this with the first 1.5TB drives as well.
I assume this means they can release the drive sooner because they don't need to test it against a bunch of different controllers, as long as it works with their SATA to USB bridge chip then it's all OK. then they will start testing it with motherboard controllers and RAID chipsets before releasing a different version of the bare drive or just the same drive with updated firmware.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)