Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Windows 98SE RAM Usage

  1. #1
    MurphmanL
    Guest

    Windows 98SE RAM Usage

    On a computer running 1GB of Ram, is there a way to make windows 98SE take advantage of that RAM? I believe Microsoft posted an article about it, I followed that info and still no avail... using 1GB means that I experience choppy and slow DivX Playback in the DIVX player, and also extremely slow and unlplayable performance in games like Generals, is there a way to make 98SE use all my RAM?

  2. #2
    Ah, Mrs. Peel! mike_w's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Hertfordshire, England
    Posts
    3,326
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    9 times in 7 posts
    When I used 98 on my old PC (800MHz, 256 SDRAM), it ran DivX fine, but can't say about the games - been using 2000 for ages now.

    Having more memory shouldn't cause a problem, it just doesn't use all of it.
    Last edited by mike_w; 22-02-2004 at 04:23 PM.
    "Well, there was your Uncle Tiberius who died wrapped in cabbage leaves but we assumed that was a freak accident."

  3. #3
    HEXUS.social member Allen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    8,536
    Thanks
    363
    Thanked
    262 times in 168 posts
    • Allen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Maximus VIII Gene
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 6600K
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 8GB Kingston HyperX Predator DDR4-3000
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Samsung 950 PRO NVMe M.2 (OS) + 2 x 512GB Samsung 960 EVO in RAID 0 (Games)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 Ti OC
      • PSU:
      • XFX P1-650X-NLG9 XXX 650W Modular
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Node 804
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Home 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" BenQ XL2730Z + 23" Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 200Mbps
    Windows can't handle more than 512MB iirc... Dunno if more memory would cause a problem though.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    2,069
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    7 times in 3 posts
    I have a machine with 512 on windows 98SE (which im using right now!).
    I think 512 is the max, but Divx isnt slow on mine (1100Mhz).
    You probably need a faster processor really...
    Twigman

  5. #5
    Comfortably Numb directhex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    /dev/urandom
    Posts
    17,074
    Thanks
    228
    Thanked
    1,026 times in 677 posts
    • directhex's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus ROG Strix B550-I Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 5900x
      • Memory:
      • 64GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Seagate Firecuda 520
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra
      • PSU:
      • EVGA SuperNOVA 850W G3
      • Case:
      • NZXT H210i
      • Operating System:
      • Ubuntu 20.04, Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 34GN850
      • Internet:
      • FIOS
    windows 98 slows down when you have over 256mb of ram in most scenarios, and cannot address over 512mb

    well strictly speaking it's still just an MSDOS front end, and shouldn't be using more than 640K

    if you want to use more than an MSDOS' worth of RAM, use a real 32bit OS like something NT based (2000, XP, 2003)

  6. #6
    Senior Member joshwa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sheffield, UK
    Posts
    4,856
    Thanks
    132
    Thanked
    67 times in 62 posts
    • joshwa's system
      • Motherboard:
      • PC Chips M577 AT/ATX
      • CPU:
      • AMD K6-2 500Mhz
      • Memory:
      • 128mb PC100 SDRAM
      • Storage:
      • 8GB Fujitsu
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 3dfx Voodoo 3 3000 AGP (16mb)
      • PSU:
      • ATX 500watt
      • Case:
      • Midi Tower AT
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 98 SE
      • Monitor(s):
      • 22" TFT Widescreen
    when i used to use win98, there was a program called memory manager or turbo memory - which seemed to do a good job . i don't know whether there might be some kind of add-on tool to win98 which would let you use your ram properly?

  7. #7
    Ravens Nest
    Guest
    Cacheman has settings for users with more than 512MB ram and Windows 95/98/SE/ME
    http://www.outertech.com/index.php?m...mageField.y=10

  8. #8
    MurphmanL
    Guest
    So this program will be able to make win 98SE or ME speed up by using my 1GB of RAM?

  9. #9
    Ravens Nest
    Guest
    It has settings to allow you use your 1gb of ram without causing instability with your O\S.

    I dont think 98se and ME are designed to use more than 512mb of ram

    What cacheman does is optimize your operating system to use as much of the ram as possible before switching to HD i.e. virtual memory (Which is a lot slower) so in theory it should increase speed.

    But it wont allow you to use more than 512 ram, you'll need to upgrade to 2000/xp for that, perhaps it's time for that upgrade..

    Still cacheman is a really good program, give it a try anyway and if it does not help or makes it worse (very unlikely!) it saves the settings your PC was at before it was installed and you can load it back to defaults.

    Go on install it you know it makes sense

  10. #10
    HEXUS.timelord. Zak33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    I'm a Jessie
    Posts
    35,185
    Thanks
    3,126
    Thanked
    3,179 times in 1,926 posts
    • Zak33's system
      • Storage:
      • Kingston HyperX SSD, Hitachi 1Tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 1050
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 800w
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT01
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTC uber speedy
    I know I am the least techy bloke here.....but sod it..I'm gonna stick my neck out....

    Win 98SE can see up to 768 mb......it did on my old PC...I had lots of mem combos back when silicon was cheap....I brough a lot from Crucial.....and the 512 in one slot and 256 in the other slot worked fine...but no more was ever seen...so 2x512 still showed as 768.

    In Gaming it did slow it down ....512 was far better....

    Which is a shame

    Quote Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
    "The second you aren't paying attention to the tool you're using, it will take your fingers from you. It does not know sympathy." |
    "If you don't gaffer it, it will gaffer you" | "Belt and braces"

  11. #11
    Ravens Nest
    Guest
    Yeah you're right Zak33, it can see up to 768 ram, there does not seem to be a way of getting it to use more

    Cacheman is good at getting the most out of your memory, and reduces instability with more than 512..

    I myself know a lot about PC's but my brain does not store or remember stuff that well though when you said it can see 768 i remembered that it can

  12. #12
    Common Sense Advocate Rabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Preston
    Posts
    760
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    5 times in 4 posts
    • Rabs's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 7
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 6700K
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance Red
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Samsung 950 Pro Nvme, 1TB Seagate HD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA Nvidia 970OC
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster Ethusiast 850W
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Stacker STC 101
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq GW2760 27"
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Cable 200/12
    Try this pal:

    http://jerseyd.com/ninetyeighttweaks.htm

    just found it while browsing...

  13. #13
    Cable Guy Jonny M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Loughborough Uni
    Posts
    4,263
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    4 times in 1 post
    Quote Originally Posted by directhex
    windows 98 slows down when you have over 256mb of ram in most scenarios, and cannot address over 512mb

    well strictly speaking it's still just an MSDOS front end, and shouldn't be using more than 640K

    if you want to use more than an MSDOS' worth of RAM, use a real 32bit OS like something NT based (2000, XP, 2003)

    Does NT 4.0 Server / Workstation count as 32 bit?

  14. #14
    Comfortably Numb directhex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    /dev/urandom
    Posts
    17,074
    Thanks
    228
    Thanked
    1,026 times in 677 posts
    • directhex's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus ROG Strix B550-I Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 5900x
      • Memory:
      • 64GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Seagate Firecuda 520
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra
      • PSU:
      • EVGA SuperNOVA 850W G3
      • Case:
      • NZXT H210i
      • Operating System:
      • Ubuntu 20.04, Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 34GN850
      • Internet:
      • FIOS
    yes. yes it does. windows nt 3.1 and above are proper 32bit operating systems

  15. #15
    MurphmanL
    Guest
    Very nice discovery there, Rabs. Do u think ur solution will allow me to use 1GB and then speed up DIVX video playback and gaming performance?? Could u do me a big favour and explain how to add those entries into MSCONFIG? Cheers, its much appreciated!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Windows Security Update CD
    By XTR in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 19-02-2004, 11:16 AM
  2. Windows XP Email?
    By joshwa in forum Software
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 18-01-2004, 09:38 AM
  3. Windows 98se Updates? Help Needed
    By Jimmy Little in forum Software
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-12-2003, 01:27 AM
  4. Windows Update flaw 'left PCs open' to MSBlast
    By Bunjiweb in forum Software
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 19-08-2003, 02:44 PM
  5. Best Corsair RAM for Asus P4C800-E ?
    By solrak in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 19-08-2003, 12:04 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •