Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: FLAC 1.1.3 is out

  1. #1
    Does he need a reason? Funkstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    19,874
    Thanks
    630
    Thanked
    965 times in 816 posts
    • Funkstar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte EG45M-DS2H
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Quad Q9550 (2.83GHz)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB OCZ PC2-6400C5 800MHz Quad Channel
      • Storage:
      • 650GB Western Digital Caviar Blue
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 512MB ATI Radeon HD4550
      • PSU:
      • Antec 350W 80+ Efficient PSU
      • Case:
      • Antec NSK1480 Slim Mini Desktop Case
      • Operating System:
      • Vista Ultimate 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407 + 2408 monitors
      • Internet:
      • Zen 8mb

    FLAC 1.1.3 is out

    As the title says.

    Changelog is here:
    http://flac.sourceforge.net/changelog.html

    and download page is here:
    http://sourceforge.net/project/showf...group_id=13478

    I'm going re-encode a couple of albums to see how much of a difference the improved compression makes.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    536
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts
    Nice. Let us know what your research comes up with. Let's hope with compression is significantly better.
    Asus Z170 Pro Gaming. i5-6500. 16gig Ripjaw 2400. Samsung 950pro NMVe 250gig+ 1tb Intel 660p. GTX Titan. Corsair TX650M.



    939 3800 X2 | 2gig corsairXMS 3200C2
    1950XT | 500gig,320,200,160
    Plextor DVD burner | Yamaha CRW-F1 CD-drive
    Thermaltake Xaser 3 w 480W FSP | X-fi fatal1ty

    Things have moved on since I first joined...

  3. #3
    Does he need a reason? Funkstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    19,874
    Thanks
    630
    Thanked
    965 times in 816 posts
    • Funkstar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte EG45M-DS2H
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Quad Q9550 (2.83GHz)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB OCZ PC2-6400C5 800MHz Quad Channel
      • Storage:
      • 650GB Western Digital Caviar Blue
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 512MB ATI Radeon HD4550
      • PSU:
      • Antec 350W 80+ Efficient PSU
      • Case:
      • Antec NSK1480 Slim Mini Desktop Case
      • Operating System:
      • Vista Ultimate 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407 + 2408 monitors
      • Internet:
      • Zen 8mb
    Got round to doing a little testing this evening.

    Code:
    FLAC 1.1.1 -6
    =============
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 01.flac        34,746,441
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 02.flac        39,847,635
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 03.flac        49,837,157
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 04.flac        14,940,639
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 05.flac        22,505,958
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 06.flac        56,664,984
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 07.flac        48,523,004
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 08.flac        63,504,254
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 09.flac        13,347,604
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 10.flac        54,341,202
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 11.flac        95,480,000
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 12.flac        42,697,384
                                 -------------------------
                                 12 File(s)    536,436,262 bytes
    
    FLAC 1.1.1 -8
    =============
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 01.flac        34,647,759
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 02.flac        39,615,286
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 03.flac        49,594,714
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 04.flac        14,823,598
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 05.flac        22,437,221
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 06.flac        56,257,984
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 07.flac        48,126,259
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 08.flac        62,910,992
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 09.flac        13,297,712
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 10.flac        53,916,172
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 11.flac        94,873,781
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 12.flac        42,509,883
                                 -------------------------
                                 12 File(s)    533,011,361 bytes
                                                     99.36 % of FLAC 1.1.1 -6
    
    FLAC 1.1.3 -8
    =============
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 01.flac        34,511,990
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 02.flac        39,427,088
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 03.flac        49,134,975
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 04.flac        14,658,683
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 05.flac        22,090,753
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 06.flac        56,072,758
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 07.flac        47,562,514
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 08.flac        62,710,992
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 09.flac        12,859,723
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 10.flac        53,651,617
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 11.flac        94,267,117
    Goldfrapp - We Are Glitter - 12.flac        42,180,372
                                 -------------------------
                                 12 File(s)    529,128,582 bytes
                                                     98.64 % of FLAC 1.1.1 -6
                                                     99.27 % of FLAC 1.1.1 -8
    The reason for the -6 compression setting was that is what EAC was setup to encode to. For some reason i put that in instead of -8 a while ago, not sure why. I actually think a lot of the library is encoded at -5 as well.

    Anyway, the difference in compression ratio is tiny. barely 0.7% reduction in the versions. So probably not a lot of point in re-FLACing your collection really.

    But lets see what the maths are when you take a large library of 14,043 flac tracks.

    Size on disk at the moment: 388,679,239,117 bytes (361.98 GB)
    Estimated size when using FLAC 1.1.1 -8: 386,230,559,911 bytes (359.70 GB)
    Estimated size when using FLAC 1.1.3 -8: 383,393,201,465 bytes (357.06 GB)

    So thats almost 5GB of data i could save over my whole library.

    Is it worth re-FLAC-ing my library? Perhaps. If i can get a script or utility that will just run in the background over the course of a few days and re-compress everything then, yeah, i might do that at some point. Would also be a good test for my X2 system. not done any kind of stress testing or benchmarks on it yet.

    EDIT: Each album averages 384.12MB so an extra 5GB would let me store another 13 albums in the saved space
    Last edited by Funkstar; 01-12-2006 at 11:01 PM.

  4. #4
    Almost in control. autopilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Region 2
    Posts
    4,071
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked
    12 times in 11 posts
    Nice work Funkstar.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Renumbering FLAC files - help!
    By Mutley in forum Consumer Electronics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-05-2006, 10:49 AM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-06-2005, 10:11 PM
  3. FLAC > MP3...sloooow
    By iMc in forum Consumer Electronics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-05-2005, 06:37 PM
  4. EAC and FLAC
    By alterion in forum Software
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-05-2005, 11:31 AM
  5. MP3, OGG, APE or FLAC?
    By TeePee in forum Consumer Electronics
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 13-04-2004, 02:34 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •