Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 29

Thread: Should cars be designed to do 100mph+

  1. #1
    TiG
    TiG is offline
    Walk a mile in other peoples shoes...
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Questioning it all
    Posts
    6,213
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked
    48 times in 43 posts

    Should cars be designed to do 100mph+

    Playing devils advocate here for a minute, but I read an article recently looking at how much fun you could buy for £30k.

    They took a number of different cars and had fun with them on the open roads and on a track. One of the conclusions that suprised me from one of the reviewers was the car that was most fun to drive, quick as anything round the track and ultimate fun to drive didn't win.

    Reason because you couldn't enjoy but 10% of the cars potential legally on normal roads, so i look at this and wondered, should we really be producing cars that are that much ahead of the legalities of the road?.

    I know that building bigger engines has improvements in efficency etc but there is a balance to be struck here anyway?, and with all the new safety regs coming in the next few years we are unlikely to see the sort of relative performance with cars getting much heavier again to meet these regulations.

    Should manufacturers be looking to improve efficency of engines rather than getting them to race suspension, turbo'd monsters like the evo fq320 are

    TiG
    -- Hexus Meets Rock! --

  2. #2
    only the finest beef
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    1,175
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    There's always the Autobahn...

  3. #3
    Blue Army Member spazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Sonning, Reading, Berks
    Posts
    1,939
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    10 times in 9 posts
    • spazman's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte DS3
      • CPU:
      • Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 2GB Corsair PC6400
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 320gb RAID 0 , 250gb IDE , 160gb IDE, 400bg USB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 7900GX2
      • PSU:
      • 750watt Enermax
      • Case:
      • Akasa Eclipse
      • Monitor(s):
      • 19" LCD 19" CRT
      • Internet:
      • Be Unlimited
    Yes they should.
    NES, SNES, N64, GameCube, Wii, GBA, DS, PSone, PS2, PSP, PS3 60gb, XBOX, XBOX 360, Master System, Game Gear, Mega Drive, Saturn, Dreamcast, PC Engine, Neo Geo CD

  4. #4
    TiG
    TiG is offline
    Walk a mile in other peoples shoes...
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Questioning it all
    Posts
    6,213
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked
    48 times in 43 posts
    Want to justify it Spaz?

    TiG
    -- Hexus Meets Rock! --

  5. #5
    only the finest beef
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    1,175
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    You said yourself that cars will get heavier due to safety standards - isn't that justification that engines should be more powerful?

    setting the suspension on the car so that it's race like just makes it handle better for the people that like stiff handling.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Shad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    In front
    Posts
    2,782
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked
    42 times in 25 posts
    Having a high ceiling means you can go slower with less fuss.

    And you can go faster when no-one's looking
    Simon


  7. #7
    TiG
    TiG is offline
    Walk a mile in other peoples shoes...
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Questioning it all
    Posts
    6,213
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked
    48 times in 43 posts
    As i said i'm playing devils advocate, cars engines can get more powerful yep no problem with that, but thats to counter act the weight increase, if anything the power to weight ratio over the last 5 years has increased dramatically.

    Question i'm trying to make is that do manufacturers build cars to do 100mph+ in their design spec?, personally i don't think they generally do, they accept what speed they get out once they've done their design build.

    its obvious that people demand quick cars, it was one of my criteria when i purchased my new one. Does having a car that can do 0-60mph in 4.2 and do 180mph top speed essential? compared to one that can do 0-60mph in 4.2 and a top speed of 100mph with the top gears being setup to be incredibly efficent?.

    TiG
    -- Hexus Meets Rock! --

  8. #8
    HEXUS.timelord. Zak33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    I'm a Jessie
    Posts
    35,176
    Thanks
    3,121
    Thanked
    3,173 times in 1,922 posts
    • Zak33's system
      • Storage:
      • Kingston HyperX SSD, Hitachi 1Tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 1050
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 800w
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT01
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTC uber speedy
    make me a rear wheel drive car with top speed of 80 ish and reasonably supple suspension (yeah softish.....soft springs, hard shocks) and you're in business...

    oh hang on...

    the Cappucino is JUST THAT

    Quote Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
    "The second you aren't paying attention to the tool you're using, it will take your fingers from you. It does not know sympathy." |
    "If you don't gaffer it, it will gaffer you" | "Belt and braces"

  9. #9
    only the finest beef
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    1,175
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Zak33
    make me a rear wheel drive car with top speed of 80 ish and reasonably supple suspension (yeah softish.....soft springs, hard shocks) and you're in business...

    oh hang on...

    the Cappucino is JUST THAT
    I'm sure you've said that before

    Or is that de ja vu?

  10. #10
    Now with added sobriety Rave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    SE London
    Posts
    9,948
    Thanks
    501
    Thanked
    399 times in 255 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TiG
    compared to one that can do 0-60mph in 4.2 and a top speed of 100mph with the top gears being setup to be incredibly efficent?.
    That doesn't work. For fast acceleration you need lots of power. For efficient cruising you need tall gearing. Lots of power + tall gearing = high top speed, in general. The only way to stop a car that can do 0-60 in 4.2 seconds and cruise efficiently from going well over 100mph is to electronically limit it.

    Whether the government should introduce those electronic limits is the question. It all comes down to how much we should be regulated by the nanny state vs. how much should be personal responsibility. There are reasons to have a high performance car; for a start you can drive them to a track and then drive fast legally. In general a high performance car will handle and stop better so you could potentially avoid more accidents in normal driving; and in the unlikely circumstances that you're in the middle of the scottish highlands with someone who's just accidentally cut their femoral artery and is bleeding to death, you could probably get them to hospital quicker than a helicopter could.

    There aren't that many things a big hunting knife can do that a swiss army knife can't but it's still legal to own the hunting knife (although not to carry it around in the street for no reason, just as it's not legal to speed). My car is capable of 120mph or more, and although I do occasionally drive faster than the speed limit, I consider myself a safe and responsible driver.

    Rich :¬)

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    2,435
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    4 times in 2 posts
    • BenW's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock Dual SATA2
      • CPU:
      • AMD64 3500+
      • Memory:
      • 1GB Crucial DDR
      • Storage:
      • 160GB Samsung 8MB Cache
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Radeon HD 3850
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic S12 600W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ-04
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 17" Ultrasharp
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 8Mb
    why has nobody mentioned electronic speed limiting like what mercedes and bmw do?

    All the devices can be disabled for trackdays etc but it doesn't limit aceleration or crusing speeds/rpms

  12. #12
    Sublime HEXUS.net
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    The Void.. Floating
    Posts
    11,819
    Thanks
    213
    Thanked
    233 times in 160 posts
    • Stoo's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Mac Pro
      • CPU:
      • 2*Xeon 5450 @ 2.8GHz, 12MB Cache
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 1600MHz FBDIMM
      • Storage:
      • ~ 2.5TB + 4TB external array
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI Radeon HD 4870
      • Case:
      • Mac Pro
      • Operating System:
      • OS X 10.7
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Samsung 244T Black
      • Internet:
      • Zen Max Pro
    yeah, they're limited to 155mph.. so that's.. useful
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

  13. #13
    Administrator Moby-Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    There's no place like ::1 (IPv6 version)
    Posts
    10,665
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked
    385 times in 314 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Zak33
    make me a rear wheel drive car with top speed of 80 ish and reasonably supple suspension (yeah softish.....soft springs, hard shocks) and you're in business...

    oh hang on...

    the Cappucino is JUST THAT
    I think Jiff is about to ask for you hand in marriage

    I'd be happy with a car that went like stink up to 90 ( ok so I'm pushig the limilts here )

    but was FUN to drive - modern cars feel so sterile
    my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    1,467
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    What about something like a Caterham 7. They accelerate like hell but they dont go fast very well because of dubious aerodynamics.
    For general use a car that accelerates quick and makes you feel the power (like a Caterham) is what you want. Speeding is all very well but it is hardly something that most of us do on a regular basis and it is very unlikely that we will ever get anywhere near the potential speeds of most sports cars etc on a public road unless one is very foolhardy . TBH I would be in favour of an electronic speed limiter that would limit you to 70-80mph and could be dissabled on track days etc. I dont know how feasible that would be though.

    Incidentally what is the purpose of the speed limiters on BMWs etc?

  15. #15
    only the finest beef
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    1,175
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by turkster
    What about something like a Caterham 7. They accelerate like hell but they dont go fast very well because of dubious aerodynamics.
    For general use a car that accelerates quick and makes you feel the power (like a Caterham) is what you want. Speeding is all very well but it is hardly something that most of us do on a regular basis and it is very unlikely that we will ever get anywhere near the potential speeds of most sports cars etc on a public road unless one is very foolhardy . TBH I would be in favour of an electronic speed limiter that would limit you to 70-80mph and could be dissabled on track days etc. I dont know how feasible that would be though.

    Incidentally what is the purpose of the speed limiters on BMWs etc?
    I presume the purpose of the limiters is so that cars can't do stupid speeds on the autobahns.

    Stops people being REALLY stupid elsewhere as well.

  16. #16
    Капраз dkmech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    On an invisible submarine
    Posts
    3,077
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked
    17 times in 12 posts
    • dkmech's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5Q Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @3.16GHz
      • Memory:
      • 4gb ddr2 6400
      • Storage:
      • 2*640gb WD Raid 0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon 6970
      • PSU:
      • 620
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster 690
      • Operating System:
      • Vista 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" Hanns G, 19" Hyundai L90D+
      • Internet:
      • 14Mb
    To stop you doing silly speed that you are unlikely to be able to handle? To show to the government that you are not selling the car on speed alone.

    My 106 is quite fun to drive when light, and it will only do 99mph. But i have to say that with 3 people + luggage going up a hill in north wales - 2nd gear is the highest you can go But its nippy and fun round town.

    On an unrelated note - Craig Charles looks really annoying in this ****ty program. Best switch tv over.
    Tough on mirrors, tough on the causes of mirrors.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. I've driven LOADS of cars today.....
    By Zak33 in forum Automotive
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 19-07-2009, 10:57 AM
  2. There ARE Women cars
    By Stringent in forum Automotive
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 30-11-2003, 12:07 AM
  3. f1 cars
    By oddytomtom in forum Automotive
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 13-10-2003, 12:10 AM
  4. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 29-08-2003, 08:52 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •