Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 33 to 44 of 44

Thread: 200+ Bhp in FWD cars

  1. #33
    Now with added sobriety Rave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    SE London
    Posts
    9,948
    Thanks
    501
    Thanked
    399 times in 255 posts
    I thought torque steer was just the result of one wheel spinning, and thus losing lateral grip as well, causing the other tyre to pull the car round?

  2. #34
    www.5lab.co.uk
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    6,406
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rave
    I thought torque steer was just the result of one wheel spinning, and thus losing lateral grip as well, causing the other tyre to pull the car round?

    no, if one wheel did this in a non-lsd car then you'd simply loose all power as it all went to the spinning wheel

    on a lsd car, this would make the car pull one way or t'other - which is part of what destroyed the focus rs.
    hughlunnon@yahoo.com | I have sigs turned off..

  3. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,945
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked
    388 times in 315 posts
    • badass's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-m pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 2TB WD Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon RX 580
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG02-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Del U2311, LG226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • 80/20 FTTC
    Quote Originally Posted by Neo_VR
    Ive got a fabia RS with circa 190bhp and 320lb/ft..
    that doesnt torque steer... (well it does at the moment as the whishbone bushes are FUBAR) altho itll light up the std (michelin) tyres in 1st and 2nd in the dry, and 3rd in the wet... its much better now ive got decent tyres on it, but still demands a bit of respect on the throttle, especially in the wet.

    Wasnt it Volvo who originally said that 170bhp is the most a FWD chassis would take??

    granted, RWD is more suited... the BMW 130i has what... almost 270bhp? and ill bet it would whip any FWD car on the twisties... but at the same time, if yer "average" 200bhp hothatch was RWD, im sure yer average chav would be more likely to stack it! - i would like to think im a ok driver, but even the thought of a similar powered car in RWD scares me a bit..
    One of the odd things. Torque steer has nothing to do with torque. Power has vastly more of an effect than torque.
    Also, FYI it was SAAB (makers of 250 BHP FWD cars currnetly) that said 170 BHP was the FWD limit
    "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."

  4. #36
    Cyber whore
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    the seven sea,s
    Posts
    519
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • bouncin's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit an8 32x
      • CPU:
      • x2 4400 @2.7
      • Memory:
      • 2gb ocz el platinum
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 74 gb raptors raid 0 1 x 250 gbcaviar
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gainward bliss 7950gx2
      • PSU:
      • ocx powerstream 600w
      • Case:
      • Eclipse
      • Operating System:
      • xp
      • Monitor(s):
      • samsung LE40A565
      • Internet:
      • 20MB virgin media
    Im not really into cars but have learned some interesting stuff from this thread.
    so thanx for a nice legible thread.

    btw i havent even got a licence lol.

  5. #37
    Banned cm_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Big Shell
    Posts
    939
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    i have seen a insane civic with 500BHP... it had a teg type R lump in its bay mind... they reckoned it could eat skylines i don't think so LOL. also it had 200BHP of NoS tut tut...

  6. #38
    Treasure Hunter extraordinaire herulach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    5,618
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked
    172 times in 159 posts
    • herulach's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z97 MPower
      • CPU:
      • i7 4790K
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB WD Blue + 250GB 840 EVo
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2* Palit GTX 970 Jetstream
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova G2 850W
      • Case:
      • CM HAF Stacker 935, 2*360 Rad WC Loop w/EK blocks.
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1
      • Monitor(s):
      • Crossover 290HD & LG L1980Q
      • Internet:
      • 120mb Virgin Media
    It might do, assuming its set up right and not just a dyno queen, most skylines you see arent that fast, well, nothing like as fast as their rep would make out anyway.

    I never quite got how they rate the nitrous either, cos you cant make it give you 200hp, well you could, but only at 1 very specific rpm, it depends when its on. 200lb/ft i could understand.

  7. #39
    Banned cm_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Big Shell
    Posts
    939
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    in theory 100BHP nitrous is bout 30/50 actual power output aparently.

  8. #40
    Now with added sobriety Rave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    SE London
    Posts
    9,948
    Thanks
    501
    Thanked
    399 times in 255 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by herulach
    I never quite got how they rate the nitrous either, cos you cant make it give you 200hp, well you could, but only at 1 very specific rpm, it depends when its on. 200lb/ft i could understand.
    The reason it works that way is that if you inject a specific amount of extra fuel (with the nitrous) you get a specific amount of extra power. It doesn't matter where you are in the rev range because that extra fuel is always getting burnt.

    And yes, that does mean that if you hit the nitrous button at low revs you can end up with a massive amount of torque being produced, enough to break engines/gearboxes.

  9. #41
    Treasure Hunter extraordinaire herulach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    5,618
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked
    172 times in 159 posts
    • herulach's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z97 MPower
      • CPU:
      • i7 4790K
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB WD Blue + 250GB 840 EVo
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2* Palit GTX 970 Jetstream
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova G2 850W
      • Case:
      • CM HAF Stacker 935, 2*360 Rad WC Loop w/EK blocks.
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1
      • Monitor(s):
      • Crossover 290HD & LG L1980Q
      • Internet:
      • 120mb Virgin Media
    Quote Originally Posted by Rave
    The reason it works that way is that if you inject a specific amount of extra fuel (with the nitrous) you get a specific amount of extra power. It doesn't matter where you are in the rev range because that extra fuel is always getting burnt.

    And yes, that does mean that if you hit the nitrous button at low revs you can end up with a massive amount of torque being produced, enough to break engines/gearboxes.
    Yeah, thats my point, you cant rate it for extra horses, just for extra torque, since horses are dependant on rpm, so putting it in at different rpm gives you a different horsepower boost.

    Maybe i should start selling 200 shots on ebay, that are actually like 1lb/ft and have a little disclaimer to the effect that if your engine cant hit 100000rpm its your fault not mine.

  10. #42
    Banned cm_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Big Shell
    Posts
    939
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by herulach
    Yeah, thats my point, you cant rate it for extra horses, just for extra torque, since horses are dependant on rpm, so putting it in at different rpm gives you a different horsepower boost.

    Maybe i should start selling 200 shots on ebay, that are actually like 1lb/ft and have a little disclaimer to the effect that if your engine cant hit 100000rpm its your fault not mine.
    hehe exactly, but like it be well fast b4 it blows engine innit [/chav]
    LOL
    Last edited by cm_uk; 01-08-2005 at 10:57 PM.

  11. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,945
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked
    388 times in 315 posts
    • badass's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-m pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 2TB WD Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon RX 580
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG02-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Del U2311, LG226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • 80/20 FTTC
    Quote Originally Posted by herulach
    Yeah, thats my point, you cant rate it for extra horses, just for extra torque, since horses are dependant on rpm, so putting it in at different rpm gives you a different horsepower boost.

    Maybe i should start selling 200 shots on ebay, that are actually like 1lb/ft and have a little disclaimer to the effect that if your engine cant hit 100000rpm its your fault not mine.
    Nope its more consistent with horses as an X HP NO2 Kit will give a lower Torque boost the more RPM it is used at. The HP is roughly constant. However all of the kits seem to exaggerate the claimed figures.
    "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."

  12. #44
    Looser Konan555's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    2,749
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked
    47 times in 44 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by herulach
    I never quite got how they rate the nitrous either, cos you cant make it give you 200hp, well you could, but only at 1 very specific rpm, it depends when its on. 200lb/ft i could understand.
    Any bhp figure is rpm dependent. No different from if you're measureing an N/A car for an increase from something like a change of cam profile.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Totally Free Nokia 3120 - 200 mins 200 txt a month.
    By MD in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-04-2005, 05:30 PM
  2. 4wd in normal road cars
    By Zak33 in forum Automotive
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 23-03-2005, 09:19 PM
  3. Car's I've driven in a week
    By Zak33 in forum Automotive
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 12-01-2005, 07:50 PM
  4. Should cars be designed to do 100mph+
    By TiG in forum Automotive
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 03-06-2004, 09:07 PM
  5. Rally Report from Hexus Rally Central
    By Zak33 in forum Automotive
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-06-2004, 10:55 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •