Chrysler Firepower anyone? 56k=LMFAO NO WAY!

[cm_uk]

YUM!

what you lot think?

http://www.dieselstation.com/wallpap...oncept-009.jpg

http://www.rsportscars.com/foto/07/f...r05_inter2.jpg

http://www.rsportscars.com/foto/07/f...r05_engine.jpg

http://www.autogaleria.pl/tapety/img..._2005_01_b.jpg

http://www.seriouswheels.com/pics-20...-1920x1440.jpg

Specifications

Engine
Type: V8
Displacement cu in (cc): 370 (6059)
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 425(318) / 6200
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 420(569) / 4800
Redline at RPM: 6400
Brakes & Tires
Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc
Tires F-R: 275/35 R19 - 335/30 R20

Exterior Dimensions & Weight
Length × Width × Height in: 172.6 × 73.2 × 47.7
Weight lb (kg): 3380 (1533)

Performance
Acceleration 0-62 mph s: 4.5 (est.)
Top Speed mph (km/h): 175 (282) (est.)
Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): n.a.


---Edit by CocoPops---
Use your brain, bloody idiot! Links are better than images when they are that big!!

[headbrace]

A couple of the images aren't showing for me.

It does look quite nice, in an ordinary sports-car kind of way. The back looks to me a lot like a DB9.

[cm_uk]

yeh definately db9 rear lights... suits it though IMO...

[herulach]

meh, and why the lights on the antenna, thats just daft.

[cm_uk]

another brake light i spose pointless though lol

[Konan555]

Quite possibly the coolest name for a car ever.

I do wish the americans would grown out of chromed wheels.

[Spunkey]

wonder how many horses the americans squeezed from the 6.1 litre? maybe they even managed more than 250 this time

Not a fan - still looks like a crossfire, which means it still looks like a dog having a poo.

[menthel]

Only slighly more attractive than the crossfire, which has all of the looks of a bulldog licking peepee off a thistle.

[nameinuse]

It looks like the offspring of a one-night-stand between a Crossfire and a Dodge Viper, with a bit of a we-saw-a-DB9-and-copied-it makover.

Even worse, it looks like it has a standard automatic transmission. Why? It's a sports car, it should either have something clever and paddly or mechanical and direct.

Also, the wheels look like X-ibit or whatever his name his has got to them first. That much spinning, unsprung weight is going to make it handle like a tanker.

Suffice it to say, I'm not overly fond of this car... Quite like the 50s retro look of the interior, though.

[[GSV]Trig]

Not impressed

[J4MES]

Aston Crossfire?

[Vimeous]

Despite not being able to see front-view I reckon it ain't half bad.
However a more appropriate name might have been Dodgler Viperfire.

Take 1 part 300C engine and 2 parts Crossfire bodyshell.
Whisk lightly before spreading over Viper GTS.
Apply DB9 buttmask and Voila!

[Stoo]

Take 1 part 300C engine and 2 parts Crossfire bodyshell.
Whisk lightly before spreading over Viper GTS.
Apply DB9 buttmask and Voila!

[genie_wt]

It's an Aston Martin, I looked at the back without reading the title and thought it was a DB9 Concept.

[nameinuse]

If aston start making cars that ugly and with such pig-iron engines, I'm going to have to find something else to plan to buy when the lottery win comes in.

Suppose it'll be an interesting drive, it's not often you see something with more torque than power. Now I understand the gearbox. It's not automatic at all, it's just got Forward and Back...

[Moby-Dick]

it's not often you see something with more torque than power

If you keep you eyes closes when VAG TDi's go past

but your are pretty correct when it comes to petrol burners